Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2016, 12:33 PM   #221
ScorchyScorch
Scoring Winger
 
ScorchyScorch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Conroy, Pascall, Burke can surely speak on his behalf.

Haven't really been keeping track of who's where given the holidays.
ScorchyScorch is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 12:36 PM   #222
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Why do they even have to talk just because they are in town?

Phone seems to work fine in most cases for working out a trade.
sureLoss is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 12:36 PM   #223
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Skype, phone calls, I'm sure Brad is on top of everything even in Finland. It's not like Connie and Pascal cannot do the paperwork in his absence. He just needs to give the okay and present it to Burke to okay.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 12:44 PM   #224
ScorchyScorch
Scoring Winger
 
ScorchyScorch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Why do they even have to talk just because they are in town?

Phone seems to work fine in most cases for working out a trade.
Because it's not uncommon that trades get worked out between two clubs when/prior to them meeting on the ice.

Probably because of having two management groups in the same building. Surely more effective at moving something along than playing phone tag.

Look no further than the Flames' last trade for Freddie from the Avs on the same eve when they were in Denver.
ScorchyScorch is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 12:49 PM   #225
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

The could fax or use ICQ as well.
Da_Chief is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2016, 12:57 PM   #226
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

"uh oh"
Hackey is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2016, 04:38 PM   #227
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

@TBTimes_JSmith: #TBLightning Cooper on Drouin request: "It's tough as a coach when somebody wants out." Says he was surprised, too. Would welcome him back
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2016, 04:54 PM   #228
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan55 View Post
Why do the Lighting have such a tough time keeping player. Stamkos may leave, St Louis asked for a trade, now Drouin?? Whats gives.
all very different situations though. With St. Louis, there were a lot of rumours surrounding him being upset because Yzerman originally didn't pick him for Sotchi, but I'm not sure how true those rumours were. With Stamkos, I believe a lot of it is about money (they don't have a lot of cap space, Kucherov is due for a big raise and others are RFA too) ... I remember that when he signed his current contract, negotiations weren't really smooth either. I firmly believe that he's looking for a Kane/Toews type of deal and I'm pretty sure he won't get that in Tampa. And finally, Drouin is unhappy with his playing time and doesn't seem to be Coopers biggest fan.

So ... three very different scenarios. Don't think there's a problem in general in Tampa, Yzerman has been able to lock up every other core player with relative ease.
devo22 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2016, 05:16 PM   #229
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/DJ_Bean/status/684164417550979072

DJ BeanVerified account
‏@DJ_Bean
Brett Connolly on Drouin situation: "It'€™s not going to be given to you no matter how high a draft pick you are."

http://bigbadblog.weei.com/sports/bo...uin-situation/
Resolute 14 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 05:46 PM   #230
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Bust? Ridiculous comment. He has 40pts in 90 games. At the same age Johnny was not even in the league
Ok, bust is too strong of a term, but he is trending to be a disappointment based on his draft position. Compared to MacKinnon, Monahan, Jones, Lindholm and Barkov, he's having the most difficulty adjusting to the NHL. I wouldn't want to risk a potential lottery pick for him.
__________________

Fire is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 06:05 PM   #231
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

I posted this thought in the rychel thread, but I wonder if drouin was in the red wings system if he would be more patient based on thier model of grooming players, or if he still be asking for a trade because he and his advisors figure he is ready to be a full time nhl'r
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 06:07 PM   #232
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Ok, bust is too strong of a term, but he is trending to be a disappointment based on his draft position. Compared to MacKinnon, Monahan, Jones, Lindholm and Barkov, he's having the most difficulty adjusting to the NHL. I wouldn't want to risk a potential lottery pick for him.
I agree short term there appears to be several better options. I am shocked Tampa did not draft Jones when they had the chance.

Looking at the rest of the top 10 I don't see Nashville trading Jones, Carolina trading Lindholm, the Flamea trading Monahan, Oilers trading Nurse, Sabres trading Ristolinen. Maybe the stars would trade Nikushkin and maybe the Canucks would trade Horvat for Drouin but it is doubtful. The Yotes who took Domi 12th would be not trade him for Drouin.

That was a crazy deep draft in the top half of the first round. Having said all of that Drouin has an incredibly high ceiling but needs time to develop to reach it. He appears impatient and the fact so many that were drafted after him are excelling is likely a reason why
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:23 AM   #233
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Brooks says that the Rangers are very interested in Drouin and speculates they could trade Yandle and/or their 2016 1st (which would mean that Arizona gets their 2017 pick, because the Rags can decide whether to send them their 2016 or their 2017 1st for the Yandle deal last season).

http://nypost.com/2016/01/04/rangers...ng-malcontent/
devo22 is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:27 AM   #234
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

tampa won't want an overpriced UFA for Drouin. That would be a first for Drouin and a rental...lots of other teams can and will give up more.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:47 AM   #235
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
Brooks says that the Rangers are very interested in Drouin and speculates they could trade Yandle and/or their 2016 1st (which would mean that Arizona gets their 2017 pick, because the Rags can decide whether to send them their 2016 or their 2017 1st for the Yandle deal last season).

http://nypost.com/2016/01/04/rangers...ng-malcontent/
The Rangers first round pick will likely be bottom 10 and I would have to think Yzerman would rather have a player further along and not a pending UFA like Yandle.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:49 AM   #236
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Are the Rangers never planning to pick in the 1st round again?
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-05-2016, 09:50 AM   #237
Benched
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Benched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ...the bench
Exp:
Default

guess not...
Benched is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 10:08 AM   #238
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Backlund/Hudler plus Poirier or Klimchuck.

make it happen.

Not our 1st.
polak is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 11:20 AM   #239
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Backlund/Hudler plus Poirier or Klimchuck.

make it happen.

Not our 1st.
I've never understood this type of thinking...

They can trade Backlund, a proven NHL'er on a decent contract. They can trade Poirier who has boat loads of potential and is developing nicely.
Or they can have Klimchuk who plays a Lance Bouma type game, has a lot of potential too..

But don't trade our 1st round pick that will likely be no better than Poirier or Klimchuk?

Assuming the Flames make the playoffs that is.
IgiTang is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 11:22 AM   #240
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
I've never understood this type of thinking...

They can trade Backlund, a proven NHL'er on a decent contract. They can trade Poirier who has boat loads of potential and is developing nicely.
Or they can have Klimchuk who plays a Lance Bouma type game, has a lot of potential too..

But don't trade our 1st round pick that will likely be no better than Poirier or Klimchuk?

Assuming the Flames make the playoffs that is.
We're drafting 7th overall as of right now. Why would you believe a 7th overall pick would be worse than Poirier or Klimchuk, who are both trending to be busts?
mdubz is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy