Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2015, 09:08 AM   #301
spuzzum
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
No, out of their scoring prime. I mentioned that players are likely better when they're older but they're more well-rounded. They don't put up the goals they did when they were younger.

Getzlaf, Perry, Marleau and Hossa are all excellent players and I would love them on my team any day. But look at when they hit their career-best in goals:

Getzlaf - age 28 (31 goals)
Perry - age 25 (50 goals)
Marleau - age 30 (44 goals)
Hossa - age 23 (45 goals)

With the exception of Marleau they were all around that age of 27 or in some cases even younger. It's the same with all the greats. Lemieux (85 goals, age 23), Gretzky (92 goals, age 22), Jagr (62 goals, age 24), Howe (49 goals, age 24).

I think you can make a case that they were all overall better players at later ages, but as far as goal scoring they aren't as prolific. And if you're dishing out $14 million a year for 8 years you want to hope that the player will continue to score goals at an elite level I think.
You're correct. I argued that they became better players. Even if goal scoring goes down a smidge, they become even better players. Getzlaf has to be a perfect example. J. Toews will be the same.
spuzzum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:22 AM   #302
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0rrent98 View Post
here's another one but its not Bennett. Its Monny + 1st pick for Stamkos.

http://www.nhltraderumors.me/2015/10...ry-flames.html
There is no way the sell the future for a pending UFA. This makes no sense unless the Lightning are adding to this. Just no way BT or Burke lets this happen. I would be absolutely devastated if Monahan was traded. Please don't do this.
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
foshizzle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:25 AM   #303
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0rrent98 View Post
here's another one but its not Bennett. Its Monny + 1st pick for Stamkos.

http://www.nhltraderumors.me/2015/10...ry-flames.html
Quotes article in op.

As Spector said Tampa would want Monahan over Bennett. But even he acknowledges, Monahan is the most untradeable Flame

Last edited by sureLoss; 10-23-2015 at 09:30 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:26 AM   #304
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

If we trade Monahan or Gaudreau I'm over this team. What an unbelievable disaster that would be.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 09:36 AM   #305
drewtastic
First Line Centre
 
drewtastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
Exp:
Default

Although adding an elite talent like Stamkos would be unreal, I really don't see the value in doing so right now. This is a young team forging an identity together. I'd rather they wait and let this group overcome adversity with each other, while looking to shore-up some of the other recent deficiencies, like goaltending and commitment to team-defence.

This team isn't close to competing for a Stanley Cup. Last year was an aberration (albeit an extremely fun and deserved one). Stay the course, Flames, and continue the build as planned.
drewtastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:39 AM   #306
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-t...the-flames-up/

McKenzie on the rumor. Calls Treliving a "stealth big deal guy" says he heard quite a bit about the Flames and Stamkos in the summer
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 09:41 AM   #307
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-t...the-flames-up/

McKenzie on the rumor. Calls Treliving a "stealth big deal guy" says he heard quite a bit about the Flames and Stamkos in the summer
Which why Dreger's vehement denial is so strange
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:45 AM   #308
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Main reason I'd be hesitant to trade Monahan and a 1st is because that 1st is looking like it could be pretty high this year. Monahan and a 20 something pick is probably a decent trade if you can sign Stamkos to a fair deal. If Stamkos is say around 9 million and Monahan is going to want somewhere around 7 then I think you're better off with Stamkos. It seemed like Toews and Kane were setting the new standards in the NHL but other deals haven't really reflected that as much as I thought they would. That 1st is just what tips the scakes. That could be a top 10 pick and a very good player.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:47 AM   #309
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Friedman on Stamkos to Flames rumors:
http://www.sportsnet.ca/590/dean-blu...trade-rumours/

Summary:

heard about Stamkos to Buffalo rumor at before draft.

interesting thing about Flames rumor was that it first came out after July 1st when Stamkos' NMC had kicked in (implying that Stamkos would waive to go to Calgary?)

Calgary rumor went around the league but was denied by everyone involved.

Friedman's belief is that it was looked at, but didn't get anywhere

At least the possibility that the Flames were asked if they were willing to take on Stamkos.

Also mentions potentially a lot of teams were asked if they would consider taking Stamkos on, but the big question is if they were going to be able to re-sign him.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 09:49 AM   #310
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Quotes article in op.

As Spector said Tampa would want Monahan over Bennett. But even he acknowledges, Monahan is the most untradeable Flame
Trading Monahan would be an extremely tough pill to swallow for me. He's easily my favorite Flame, and also the most important in my opinion. I'm glad they mentioned he is probably the most untradeable Flame.

If Bennett was the centerpiece of a Stamkos deal, I would be OK with that. Although losing Bennett is not ideal, it's Steven Friggen Stamkos. You have to give up a core piece for a core piece.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:51 AM   #311
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0rrent98 View Post
here's another one but its not Bennett. Its Monny + 1st pick for Stamkos.

http://www.nhltraderumors.me/2015/10...ry-flames.html
I call absolute B.S. The Flames are not trading Monahan and a 1st for a guy who might sign. Even if Stamkos agreed to a contract the 1st still makes it too much. Now if Stamkos and the Flames have an agreement beforehand on a contract extension and it is for Monahan plus some other spare parts then I would be on board.
dissentowner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 09:53 AM   #312
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

I legitimately had a dream that the Flames trade Bennett for Stamkos last night and woke up with sticky sheets.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 10:28 AM   #313
Cflames_12.5
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Cflames_12.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary Alberta
Exp:
Default

This rumour will not die. I am starting to think that there might be some truth behind it.
Cflames_12.5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 10:31 AM   #314
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cflames_12.5 View Post
This rumour will not die. I am starting to think that there might be some truth behind it.
Mackenzie and Spector both said it didn't sound like anything happening now, that it was this summer
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 10:42 AM   #315
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cflames_12.5 View Post
This rumour will not die. I am starting to think that there might be some truth behind it.
Surprising how quiet this rumor was in the summer it wasn't until recently that we heard about it. With Stamkos not signed and the Flames sputtering out of the gate it is not surprising that it is picking up steam.

If Stamkos does get moved Calgary likely is a team that is talking about it but that is because our GM is all over everything
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 10:57 AM   #316
StupidFlanders
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Calgary
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Surprising how quiet this rumor was in the summer it wasn't until recently that we heard about it. With Stamkos not signed and the Flames sputtering out of the gate it is not surprising that it is picking up steam.

If Stamkos does get moved Calgary likely is a team that is talking about it but that is because our GM is all over everything
That's what I'm thinking. If the Flames were 5-1 right now I don't think we'd be hearing any trade rumors involving Stamkos.
StupidFlanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to StupidFlanders For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 11:41 AM   #317
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I call absolute B.S. The Flames are not trading Monahan and a 1st for a guy who might sign. Even if Stamkos agreed to a contract the 1st still makes it too much. Now if Stamkos and the Flames have an agreement beforehand on a contract extension and it is for Monahan plus some other spare parts then I would be on board.
Any trade of that magnitude is going to be conditional on him signing in Calgary.
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to speede5 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 12:17 PM   #318
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Which why Dreger's vehement denial is so strange
Not strange when you consider it's Dreger. He gets insulted when someone other than him has the inside scoop.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calgaryblood For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 12:35 PM   #319
mikeecho
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mikeecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0rrent98 View Post
here's another one but its not Bennett. Its Monny + 1st pick for Stamkos.

http://www.nhltraderumors.me/2015/10...ry-flames.html
Anyone else find it interesting that the Flames rumour posts on this site are just a copy of what Spector posted on Sportsnet, yet there is nothing I can find attributing it to Spector/Sportsnet.

http://www.nhltraderumors.me/2015/10...ing-major.html
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/f...up-a-big-mess/
mikeecho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 02:04 PM   #320
YYC in LAX
First Line Centre
 
YYC in LAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Disgusted by some people thinking Monahan would be involved. What a joke.
__________________

YYC in LAX is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YYC in LAX For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy