09-30-2015, 11:20 PM
|
#1
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Visual Representation of Team Salaries
http://frutoper.github.io/Hockey-Viz/
Pretty cool site. You get a visual representation of percentage contribution to total team salary TY vs LY.
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Komskies For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
|
What is the orange supposed to be?
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 12:21 AM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Looks to me like orange represents players who did not finish the year on the team's roster.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-01-2015, 12:36 AM
|
#4
|
|
A Fiddler Crab
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
|
From this I learned that, as a percentage, Calgary spends the 2nd most on defense of any team in the NHL.
Montreal is first at 29.1%
Calgary 28.7%
Washington 28.3%
Tampa Bay 25.7%
Philadelphia 25.1%
Chicago 23.4%
|
|
|
|
The Following 4,294,967,295 Users Say Thank You to driveway For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-01-2015, 01:00 AM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway
From this I learned that, as a percentage, Calgary spends the 2nd most on defense of any team in the NHL.
Montreal is first at 29.1%
Calgary 28.7%
Washington 28.3%
Tampa Bay 25.7%
Philadelphia 25.1%
Chicago 23.4%
|
Sorry, it's late. What am I missing? Calgary is at 39% for me with forwards 50% and goalies 11%. 0 cap space.
Winnipeg is greater at 45% of used cap space on defense.
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 01:07 AM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Oh driveway, you're looking at total cost. The 28.7 number is in millions for the Flames, not percentage. Winnipeg is 26.8M but their total salary cap, from that chart, is only 60M.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-01-2015, 08:58 AM
|
#7
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mt House
|
Still interesting we can say Calgary pays second most on defense.
I find that interesting.
I also wonder how much Montreal's defensive investment is helping Price look so good.
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 09:12 AM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yrebmi
Still interesting we can say Calgary pays second most on defense.
I find that interesting.
I also wonder how much Montreal's defensive investment is helping Price look so good.
|
Or maybe it's why the Habs can't score enough goals?
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 09:16 AM
|
#9
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
wow Staal at 20%
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#10
|
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Jones and Raymond are eating up 10%
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 09:33 AM
|
#11
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yrebmi
Still interesting we can say Calgary pays second most on defense.
I find that interesting.
I also wonder how much Montreal's defensive investment is helping Price look so good.
|
Even HF Boards agree that the Flames have a top-3 defense in the NHL. Our top end players are signed to very reasonable deals, while our bottom 2 are overpaid. Once Engelland and Smid are off the books, Calgary will still have a top-3 d-core and probably also be paying less for our bottom pairing (or pay better defensemen the same salary).
|
|
|
10-01-2015, 05:35 PM
|
#12
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
Neat site. Subscribed to this thread for future reference. Thanks for sharing OP
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
I am demolishing this bag of mini Mr. Big bars.
Halloween candy is horrifying.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anduril
"Putting nets on puck."
- Ferland 2016
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to flamesfan1297 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-01-2015, 05:58 PM
|
#13
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Hmmm, Edmonton is still "visually" no good
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.
|
|