08-27-2015, 02:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Hurricanes sign Elias Lindholm to 2 year extension ($2.7 mil AAV)
http://hurricanes.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=777777
Quote:
|
Ron Francis, Executive Vice President and General Manager of the National Hockey League’s Carolina Hurricanes, today announced that the team has agreed to terms with forward Elias Lindholm on a two-year contract extension. The deal will pay Lindholm $2.5 million in 2016-17 and $2.9 million in 2017-18.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:00 PM
|
#2
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Pretty fair bridge contract by the looks of it!
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Glad we got Monny. And I was in the Lindholm camp pre-draft
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to dying4acup For This Useful Post:
|
14,
BACKCHECK!!!,
bdubbs,
Bezer,
Calgary4LIfe,
chalms04,
Erick Estrada,
Flamezzz,
jayswin,
JMN,
killer_carlson,
kkaleR,
Lanny_McDonald,
Mass_nerder,
Phaneufenstein,
Sainters7,
Wood
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I wanted Monahan, but it was quite close.
So glad it worked out the way it did!
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:17 PM
|
#5
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Can someone help explain this bridge deal?
So, Lindholm signs this bridge deal extension... does that mean Carolina is obligated to pay a significantly larger contract when this deal runs out (in 2017)? Can Carolina not offer a QO after this deal is over and he becomes UFA?
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:18 PM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Good deal for the Canes. Lindholm is off to a slower start than Monny for sure but I do think he is going to be a big time player moving forward.
I too was a Lindholm guy during the great debate of that draft. But I am now also super happy we got Monahan instead.
Still though, between Lindholm, Monahan and Nichushkin, that was a heck of a 5-10 draft order.
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:18 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
|
He will look good in a Nordiques jersey.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias
He will look good in a Nordiques jersey.
|
You mean Seattle <insert team name>? NHL's not going to give up that sweet sweet expansion money.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Blarg For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
Can someone help explain this bridge deal?
So, Lindholm signs this bridge deal extension... does that mean Carolina is obligated to pay a significantly larger contract when this deal runs out (in 2017)? Can Carolina not offer a QO after this deal is over and he becomes UFA?
|
According to nhlnumbers.com, he is RFA after this deal expires, so they still have some cost control, but if they want a longer deal, they are buying some UFA years which is where it gets more expensive. Those more familiar with CBA can chime in, as I am not sure how many more RFA years he would have after that deal.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:49 PM
|
#10
|
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp: 
|
Would anyone mind explaining to me why the Hurricanes were able to re-sign Lindholm to an extension during the summer?
From what I understand the Flames cannot re-sign Monahan and Gaudreau until mid-season of this upcoming year because they are on their ELCs, so what is the difference between their situation and Lindholm's?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 03:56 PM
|
#11
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yappin Tappin
Would anyone mind explaining to me why the Hurricanes were able to re-sign Lindholm to an extension during the summer?
From what I understand the Flames cannot re-sign Monahan and Gaudreau until mid-season of this upcoming year because they are on their ELCs, so what is the difference between their situation and Lindholm's?
Thanks
|
My understanding is that any contract can be extended after July 1st of the final year.
The only exception is 1 year contracts. They cannot be extended until after January 1st.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:00 PM
|
#12
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
Can someone help explain this bridge deal?
So, Lindholm signs this bridge deal extension... does that mean Carolina is obligated to pay a significantly larger contract when this deal runs out (in 2017)? Can Carolina not offer a QO after this deal is over and he becomes UFA?
|
He will be 23 when this extension expires and RFA. When this extension expires, the Canes will have to give him a qualifiying offer of 2.9 million to keep his RFA rights. If they don't he will be UFA.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:10 PM
|
#13
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
He will be 23 when this extension expires and RFA. When this extension expires, the Canes will have to give him a qualifiying offer of 2.9 million to keep his RFA rights. If they don't he will be UFA.
|
All it takes is a 2.9m qualifying offer?
I guess I'm just comparing bridge contracts similar to what PK Subban got. He signed a small bridge deal and his salary ballooned to what it is now. Seemed like Montreal owed him a lot of backpay or something.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:12 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Wait, what?
Monahan and Lindholm were drafted in the same year...I thought RFAs couldn't be extended until January 1st of their final year? We can extend Monahan right now?
- sureloss cleared that up quickly - so yeah, we can extend Monahan.
...why haven't we extended Monahan yet?!
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:15 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
All it takes is a 2.9m qualifying offer?
I guess I'm just comparing bridge contracts similar to what PK Subban got. He signed a small bridge deal and his salary ballooned to what it is now. Seemed like Montreal owed him a lot of backpay or something.
|
Subban's salary went up so much because he won a Norris trophy while he was on his bridge deal, and his 8 year deal was mostly UFA years. It had nothing to do with how low his salary was before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Wait, what?
Monahan and Lindholm were drafted in the same year...I thought RFAs couldn't be extended until January 1st of their final year? We can extend Monahan right now?
- sureloss cleared that up quickly - so yeah, we can extend Monahan.
...why haven't we extended Monahan yet?!
|
Cause there's no rush to sign a 20 year old pending RFA? And they probably want to see if he can repeat last season first.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:16 PM
|
#16
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
All it takes is a 2.9m qualifying offer?
I guess I'm just comparing bridge contracts similar to what PK Subban got. He signed a small bridge deal and his salary ballooned to what it is now. Seemed like Montreal owed him a lot of backpay or something.
|
PK developed into one of the very best defenseman in the league. Personally, I think he deserved a long term deal instead of the bridge, but hindsight is 20/20. Carolina will be hoping that Elias breaks out within the next 3 years and then they will sign him to a nice long extension.
They will qualify him at 2.9, but if he continues to improve its very unlikely that he signs for that.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:17 PM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Treliving is probably half way done the extension
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:17 PM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
...why haven't we extended Monahan yet?!
|
I believe in letting Brad sleep. He's been busy.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RedHot25 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:18 PM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
All it takes is a 2.9m qualifying offer?
I guess I'm just comparing bridge contracts similar to what PK Subban got. He signed a small bridge deal and his salary ballooned to what it is now. Seemed like Montreal owed him a lot of backpay or something.
|
Subban is paid so much because his agent took the Habs to the cleaners. A qualifying offer just keeps a player as an RFA. The player is under no obligation to sign it.
Last edited by Geeoff; 08-27-2015 at 05:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
08-27-2015, 04:19 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
Treliving is probably half way done the extension
|
I doubt it. They probably haven't even had a serious conversation about it yet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.
|
|
