04-06-2015, 11:32 PM
|
#561
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
|
god damn the schedule is incredible tomorrow
Ottawa battles Detroit
Winnipeg and St Louis
Edmonton and L.A.
Calgary and Arizona
Minnesota and Chicago... (Jets are 2 back of them even games)
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to White Out 403 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:33 PM
|
#562
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntenseFan
I just noticed that Sportsclub Stats has LA, Winnipeg and Calgary all well above 50% to make the playoffs. However, one of those teams MUST be out when all is said and done. I just decided not to look at that site for the next three games.
|
Vancouver or Minnesota could still miss
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dying4acup For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:36 PM
|
#563
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Flames are likely in with 2 wins no matter where they come
But I like the whole win 2 home games and your in with breathing room on the weekend
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:36 PM
|
#564
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey
Ok so god forbid the Canucks fail to get any points against Ari and Edm what needs to happen for them to miss?
|
Quite a few variations :
Flames win all their games to get 99 (or at least 4/6 points to get 97 points + tie breaker)
LA would need 5/6 points to hit 98
Winnipeg gets 4/6 to hit 98
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TapeToTape For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:36 PM
|
#565
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Haha, here's a crazy scenario.
Say the last game is meaningless to the Flames, and a WPG win, knocks out LA... do you 'rest' your vets and stars for the playoffs?
I would much rather WPG get in then LA.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:36 PM
|
#566
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
|
Though the results weren't as good as we hoped, both Dubnyk and Quick played quite well, as predicted by the OOT thread title. I, for one, would be willing to give Malcolm another chance to make some magic happen tomorrow, with the suggestion of asking for better results rather than individual performances
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:37 PM
|
#567
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
Basically there were 2 different games we were worried about each with 6 possible outcomes (Home reg win, Home OT win, Home SO win, Away reg win, Away OT win, Away SO win). Meaning there were a total of 36 outcomes going into tonight that would directly impact the Flames chances of finishing ahead of these 3 teams, If you were to ask at the start of the night what is the worst case scenarios were.
#1/2, Win ROW win & LA OT Win
#3/4, Win ROW win & LA SO Win
#5, Win ROW win & Van SO Win
Meaning there were 31 options for how this night could have gone better.
It was only a little bit of help.
But as I said, a hell of a lot better than #1 or #2.
That said without a win yet in April the wild have slowly gotten pulled back into this race, they play Stl, Chi & Nas and need 3 points to clinch, far from a given.
|
If jets/wild went to OT, could have been worse also.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:37 PM
|
#568
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:  
|
We need an Enigma Breaker. Were his Alan Turing when (okay I know, he did his thing for humanity) when you need him!
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:38 PM
|
#569
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dying4acup
Vancouver or Minnesota could still miss
|
Minny maybe could crash, Vancouver could pretty much be in if they didn't get anymore points this season, and just let the schedule play out on it's own with Calgary and LA only having 93 points
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:40 PM
|
#570
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
god damn the schedule is incredible tomorrow
Ottawa battles Detroit
Winnipeg and St Louis
Edmonton and L.A.
Calgary and Arizona
Minnesota and Chicago... (Jets are 2 back of them even games)
|
I honestly think I am just gonna go to bed at like 5pm, and wake up at midnight and let it all hit me in one shot.... My brain will melt if I try and follow the whole thing. I seriously can't run any more scenarios without going insane.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pylon For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:42 PM
|
#571
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
Haha, here's a crazy scenario.
Say the last game is meaningless to the Flames, and a WPG win, knocks out LA... do you 'rest' your vets and stars for the playoffs?
I would much rather WPG get in then LA.
|
Let's give the back up keeper a go in that scenario.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:43 PM
|
#572
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TapeToTape
Quite a few variations :
Flames win all their games to get 99 (or at least 4/6 points to get 97 points + tie breaker)
LA would need 5/6 points to hit 98
Winnipeg gets 4/6 to hit 98
|
2 Calgary wins really puts the odds in their favour, good illustration
then you figure if Calgary is winning two games they are knocking off one of those teams
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:46 PM
|
#573
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
So if it gets to the Winnipeg game could there be a situation where ot losses cling playoff spots for both teams?
If so the optimal play would be to agree to not play and let time run out. The puck drops and players stand still and wait until the game runs out.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:46 PM
|
#574
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
The scenario I fear is that after the Flames-Jets game is done, we have to wait for OOT results from Canucks, Kings and Wild!
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:46 PM
|
#575
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TapeToTape
Quite a few variations :
Flames win all their games to get 99 (or at least 4/6 points to get 97 points + tie breaker)
LA would need 5/6 points to hit 98
Winnipeg gets 4/6 to hit 98
|
Do both Calgary games against LA and Win need to go to OT as well?
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:48 PM
|
#576
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
Haha, here's a crazy scenario.
Say the last game is meaningless to the Flames, and a WPG win, knocks out LA... do you 'rest' your vets and stars for the playoffs?
I would much rather WPG get in then LA.
|
If it comes down to that, I will personally drive to Calgary, and buy a round at a local pub.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:48 PM
|
#577
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
If we clinch by Thursday: Sam Bennett in against WPG?
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:49 PM
|
#578
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dying4acup
The scenario I fear is that after the Flames-Jets game is done, we have to wait for OOT results from Canucks, Kings and Wild!
|
As long as they win their next 2, all that will be determined at that point is likely seeding.
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:50 PM
|
#579
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
So if it gets to the Winnipeg game could there be a situation where ot losses cling playoff spots for both teams?
If so the optimal play would be to agree to not play and let time run out. The puck drops and players stand still and wait until the game runs out.
|
a gentlemen's agreement lol
would serve the NHL right for their ridiculous point system
|
|
|
04-06-2015, 11:50 PM
|
#580
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:  
|
Nice but okay. Flames will win against Arizona but will (in my opinion) get 1 point against LA and Wpg. Ot win against wpg but reg loss against LA. One point short!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.
|
|