Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-08-2015, 04:13 PM   #821
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
Question from someone who doesn't follow junior hockey much if at all. Is McDavid so good that you simply have to take him given the chance, or could a team already stocked up on offensive prospects be better served to turn that first overall into 2 or 3 first round picks to stock up on defense? With this being the first year of every non-playoff team able to win the #1 pick, looking at the current non-playoff teams a very visible trend is teams that don't have much trouble scoring goals but a very hard time keeping them out of their own net. Toronto for example has the 2nd best offense in the league, would they really be better served with McDavid on the roster vs. filling out their weak defensive prospect pool if they won the lottery?
Considering Toronto doesn't have a #1 center they wouldn't trade him.

The big thing you look at is: you have an 18 year old generational talent center, do we draft and keep him for the next 2 decades or hold on to our older players who likely are not as good?

I think you draft him and move out a #2 center for help in your area of need.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 04:16 PM   #822
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
Question from someone who doesn't follow junior hockey much if at all. Is McDavid so good that you simply have to take him given the chance, or could a team already stocked up on offensive prospects be better served to turn that first overall into 2 or 3 first round picks to stock up on defense? With this being the first year of every non-playoff team able to win the #1 pick, looking at the current non-playoff teams a very visible trend is teams that don't have much trouble scoring goals but a very hard time keeping them out of their own net. Toronto for example has the 2nd best offense in the league, would they really be better served with McDavid on the roster vs. filling out their weak defensive prospect pool if they won the lottery?
Well it depends on organization strategy (i.e BPA vs organizational need) and how much of a gap you see between McDavid and the defencemen in this draft. In particular Toronto would not pass up a #1 center.

From what I am getting as the feeling out there is that McDavid is not Crosby level, but more of a Tavares level prospect.

Hanifin is a prospect that many people thought would exceed Seth Jones about 6 months ago. He hasn't done that. He is right now projecting into more of a top pairing dman, with maybe elite potential. Closest comparable that seems to keep coming up is Ryan Suter.

If you were given the choice between John Tavares or Ryan Suter and maybe another top 4 defenceman. Which would you take?

Everyday we are getting closer to the draft, more and more people are starting to say this draft wasn't as deep as once thought.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 04:32 PM   #823
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Everyday we are getting closer to the draft, more and more people are starting to say this draft wasn't as deep as once thought.
I dunno... when you have a eligible CHL Center that's 17 years old, 6'3, and has put up 71 points in 38 games and he's not even a consensus top 5 pick... I find it hard to believe it's not a deep draft.

I think people are just getting nitpicky earlier then they usually do.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 04:37 PM   #824
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
I dunno... when you have a eligible CHL Center that's 17 years old, 6'3, and has put up 71 points in 38 games and he's not even a consensus top 5 pick... I find it hard to believe it's not a deep draft.

I think people are just getting nitpicky earlier then they usually do.
They do still say the top end of the draft is deep, but there were people a few months ago claiming the top 50 of this draft would be really good.

Not so anymore.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 04:48 PM   #825
Hugh Jahrmes
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Hugh Jahrmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

The thought of Toronto winning the lottery makes me physically ill
__________________
Long time listener, first time caller.
Hugh Jahrmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 05:15 PM   #826
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The top 10 this year is ridiculous, probably the deepest top 10 other than 2013 in the last decade. The 1-5 is better this year than in 2013, but the 6-10 was better then.

11-25 is good, but it depends on the player.

At the end of the day I think it'll be a coin flip which is better between 2013 and this year.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 05:29 PM   #827
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

There are a few big right shooting Defenders in the middle of their list. It would be nice for the organizational depth chart if one of them turns out to be the right guy for the Flames.

Carlo Brandon 6’5’’ 198lbs WHL
Matthew Spencer 6’2” 201lbs OHL
Nicolas Meloche 6’3” 202lbs QMJHL

I honestly haven't specifically watched any of them, or read any scouting reports on them yet. But if the Flames scouts end up telling us, one of these guys was the right guy that's great.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 05:44 PM   #828
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
There are a few big right shooting Defenders in the middle of their list. It would be nice for the organizational depth chart if one of them turns out to be the right guy for the Flames.

Carlo Brandon 6’5’’ 198lbs WHL
Matthew Spencer 6’2” 201lbs OHL
Nicolas Meloche 6’3” 202lbs QMJHL

I honestly haven't specifically watched any of them, or read any scouting reports on them yet. But if the Flames scouts end up telling us, one of these guys was the right guy that's great.
I've been keeping my eye in Nicolas Meloche. He puts up some decent points in the Q & is pretty tough.

http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=213821

Quote:
A smooth skating defenceman who can put up points, utilizing his strength behind his shot, and plays with an edge. Has very good awareness on the ice, and notices possible scoring chances before they happen. Very intelligent defensively and makes high percentage decisions in his own end. When at the top of his game, Nicolas Meloche can be a game-changing, physical two-way defenceman. (Curtis Joe, EP 2014)
Yes please.

Quote:
Usually young defenders who display strong two way game don't come with a full package and toolbox. Not so here. He is player who is strong positionally but also displays mobility and strong physicality. Already mature in his understanding of his position. He takes attackers to the outside, with good gaps and timing. Retrieves many of those pucks and quickly advances them with quick outs. Reads the outlets and is precise in his passes, causing odd-man breaks at the other end. Is developing as pointman on the PP. Will walk in along the wall to open things, and is also starting to walk the blue line to set up the attack on the PP. A big man with excellent mobility. Looks destined to go early.
--Bill Placzek--
Hallelujah, our saviour has arrived!

http://www.mckeenshockey.com/prospec...015-nhl-draft/

Quote:
Another smart, heady defensemen, Meloche played in all situations as a rookie on a competitive Baie-Comeau team.

He’s not a strong skater and often has trouble controlling his gaps off the rush but he’s smart enough and strong enough to make up for it, at least at the junior level. If his skating can improve, his got the ability to be considered as a later pick in the first round.
Hrrrrm...

Last edited by FlameZilla; 01-08-2015 at 06:04 PM.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
#-3
Old 01-08-2015, 09:53 PM   #829
Hart50
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

For what it's worth the following is from Craig Button's notes on his latest 2015 draft list:

"The New Year begins with the countdown to the draft and if there is anything I know for certain, we can expect players to step up their games and continue to show that this draft class could be very special, not just at the top but throughout."
Hart50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 10:02 PM   #830
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I've been stat watching a few players with interest in this draft class and Nikita Korostelev has slipped considerably in Craigs new list.

IIRC Korostelev was ranked in the 20's earlier but maybe because he's under 1.5 ppg. Meaning his production has slowed a bit. Still keen on watching him as I think he sounds like a great fit for the Flames. If they could nab him with their 2nd rounder even better.

Another player I've been tailing since the initial list release has been Rasmus Andersson of the Barrie Colts. No Idea why he's fell off of the map but for a D man in his draft year a ppg pace is pretty solid. Haven't read any slights on his skating or his hockey IQ so maybe he could be another decent 2nd round grab if they Flames manage to get another one through trade.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 08:41 AM   #831
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Latest prospect rankings from THN

http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/20...les-the-roost/
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:40 PM   #832
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
Question from someone who doesn't follow junior hockey much if at all. Is McDavid so good that you simply have to take him given the chance, or could a team already stocked up on offensive prospects be better served to turn that first overall into 2 or 3 first round picks to stock up on defense? With this being the first year of every non-playoff team able to win the #1 pick, looking at the current non-playoff teams a very visible trend is teams that don't have much trouble scoring goals but a very hard time keeping them out of their own net. Toronto for example has the 2nd best offense in the league, would they really be better served with McDavid on the roster vs. filling out their weak defensive prospect pool if they won the lottery?
As most people, I also think you have to pick McDavid. If you have a wealth of centers, then you can trade one for defensive help

Also, this is not the first year all non playoff teams can pick first overall by winning the lottery. I beleive 2013 was the first year.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:44 PM   #833
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
As most people, I also think you have to pick McDavid. If you have a wealth of centers, then you can trade one for defensive help

Also, this is not the first year all non playoff teams can pick first overall by winning the lottery. I beleive 2013 was the first year.
This is the first year. 2013 was still just move up max 4 spots, 2014 was the changed percentages, and this year is changed percentages and the lottery winner gets 1st overall regardless of their original spot.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:50 PM   #834
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
This is the first year. 2013 was still just move up max 4 spots, 2014 was the changed percentages, and this year is changed percentages and the lottery winner gets 1st overall regardless of their original spot.
?

2013 was the first year that any non-playoff team could win 1st overall.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=658503

Quote:
The 2013 NHL Draft Lottery, to be held this year on Monday, April 29, will be the first in NHL history where all 14 clubs not qualifying for the Stanley Cup Playoffs, or the clubs that have acquired the first-round drafting positions of those non-playoff clubs, will have a chance at winning the right to the first overall selection. Under the previous lottery system, only the five teams with the fewest points in the standings had the opportunity to win the first overall selection as rules dictated no team could move up more than four spots.
2015 is the first year they changed percentages from 2013.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 02:56 PM   #835
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

wow, I thought it was still four spots back then.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2015, 05:48 PM   #836
lanny9
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: On The Dark Side Of The Moon
Exp:
Default

Erie vs London on now on Sportsnet East, Ontario and Pacific.
lanny9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 03:25 PM   #837
cral12
First Line Centre
 
cral12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Hot off the presses, 2015 NHL Mock Draft: The Next Ones New Year’s Edition

- Includes Prospect Profiler Notes

Not sure this guy is on the board in June when Flames pick, but...

Go ahead, mock the mock...
__________________
Founder: Upside Hockey & Trail Lynx; Upside on Bluesky & Instagram & Substack; Author of Raised by Rocks, Moved by Mountains
cral12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cral12 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2015, 09:21 PM   #838
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Buffalo with another three first round picks, so far. In five years they should be a top team.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 02:16 AM   #839
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Conroy and Treliving at the Dome tonight, watching Pilon and Provorov.
The Russian with a three point night and a sick dangle goal on the PP. He's got size.
Left-handed shot, but otherwise he ticks all the boxes for the Flames.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2015, 07:18 PM   #840
cral12
First Line Centre
 
cral12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

^He (Provorov) was fantastic - great to interview after the game as well - came away impressed. Never would I have projected or advised Flames to draft a Russian in the 1st rnd (in recent yrs), but in this case, I don't think I'd hesitate with what I know now.

My tweet post-game:

Quote:
@ChrisRalphTHW · Jan 11
#NHLdraft eligible Ivan Provorov told me post gm he patterns his gm after Nik Lidstrom but realistic about; today his play Lidstrom-esque.
__________________
Founder: Upside Hockey & Trail Lynx; Upside on Bluesky & Instagram & Substack; Author of Raised by Rocks, Moved by Mountains
cral12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cral12 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy