12-16-2014, 12:14 PM
|
#1
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
AHL Overtime method doing the job
|
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Nothing new discovered here; several CJHL leagues - including the AJHL - have effectively used 3 on 3 for years.
That is a massive improvement for the AHL, however 24.7% of overtime games going to a shootout is still 24.7% too high.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
First Line Centre
|
I feel like they can make the shoot out numbers even lower by increasing couple minutes in overtime. 7 minutes is such a weird number for a period length. Why not 5 min of 4v4 and 5 min of 3v3.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:18 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
|
Love it. Next year I want to see it in the NHL.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Don't like it. 3 on 3 is just as gimmicky as the shoot out, maybe even more so. Welcome to pond hockey.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zevo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:26 PM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Don't like it. 3 on 3 is just as gimmicky as the shoot out, maybe even more so. Welcome to pond hockey.
|
It may be gimmicky, but hardly more so that the shoot out. At least it's pond hockey, with two teams.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
|
automaton 3,
belsarius,
bubbsy,
greyshep,
hummdeedoo,
Igster,
jayswin,
OffsideSpecialist,
Red_Baron,
Resolute 14,
RyZ,
Table 5,
Winsor_Pilates
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
|
What i don't like is the "7" minute overtime. It seems like such an arbitrary number. I could just be OCD with this, but it seems really strange to go with a number like 7.
I think what I would prefer to see is 5 min 4-4, and 5 min 3-3.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:34 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
If they went that route, ditched the otl, and just went straight Win/Losses, I bet they'd get that Shootout number down to about 2% of games. Teams playing for ties to ensure the OTL must at least double the number of games going to OT and is the real problem they should be trying to solve.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:36 PM
|
#9
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Don't like it. 3 on 3 is just as gimmicky as the shoot out, maybe even more so. Welcome to pond hockey.
|
staged maybe, but gimmicky no
Teams can get back to back coincidental minors in any NHL game, so it's within the rules.
I hate the shoot out so I'm all for any of ...
- 3 on 3
- longer OT
- just go back to ties
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:47 PM
|
#10
|
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
If they must go with 7 mins.... my OCD would prefer 4 mins of 4 vs 4, buzzer, then 3 mins of 3 vs 3.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:50 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
7 minutes? Just seems so odd, 5 minutes or 10 minutes makes just as much sense.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 12:59 PM
|
#12
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Section 217
|
Everybody knows that 7 is the magic number:
7’s the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 dwarves. 7, man, that’s the number. 7 chipmunks twirlin’ on a branch, eatin’ lots of sunflowers on my uncle’s ranch. You know that old children’s tale from the sea. It’s like you’re dreamin’ about Gorgonzola cheese when it’s clearly Brie time, baby.
Step into my office.
Why?
‘Cause you’re f&*%n’ fired!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CrazyCaper For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:07 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
|
In the AHL do they not do that dry scape? The NHL didn't seem to like that at all this year.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:27 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
- just go back to ties
|
Fixed your post.
That being said the NHL has a hate on for the tie.
I wonder if they are coming at it from the wrong angle.
Bring ties back in, but allow for a bonus point for a win by a certain number of goals (I have no idea what that is, just blue skying here). To encourage the losing team you could maybe offer a point for losses by only one goal.
This is really off the top of my head (I am sure I will get flamed) but:
3 points for a win when you score 4/5/6 + goals
2 points for a win when you score less than the number for a 3 pt win
1 point for a tie or if you lose by only 1 goal
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:30 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
In the AHL do they not do that dry scape? The NHL didn't seem to like that at all this year.
|
AHL does still use the dry scrape before OT starts.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:58 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Just say no to ties. Play until some one wins like the playoffs
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:59 PM
|
#17
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
I could see the NHL adopting a 10 minute split of 4v4 and 3v3 instead of 7 minutes.
This is a big step up in my books, especially with how the Flames can play on open ice. 3 on 3 is a very standard drill during practices for all teams. It would be interesting to see some of the set plays that inevitably develop.
Oh and hell no to ties. This isn't soccer and I don't want to go back to tie games in hockey.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 01:59 PM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Don't like the "first whistle after 4 minutes" business. Too random. The 3-3 could end up being one minute, or zero minutes quite easily.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 02:05 PM
|
#19
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Don't like the "first whistle after 4 minutes" business. Too random. The 3-3 could end up being one minute, or zero minutes quite easily.
|
So you stop time ? Not sure how to get around that.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 02:06 PM
|
#20
|
|
First Line Centre
|
You want no ties in hockey? Easy, just ban goalies during OT...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.
|
|
