| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 12:23 PM | #1 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Calgary      | 
				 Standings/Team Rankings over the last 20 years? 
 
			
			I saw the thread a week or so back that showed the Team Standings by points over the last 8 years or so but I've been curious what the Standings/Rankings would be over the last 20 years and I'll admit that I don't have the spreadsheet skills to create a proper list, especially with how the expansion teams come into the frey.
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 02:57 PM | #2 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hi-Psi  I saw the thread a week or so back that showed the Team Standings by points over the last 8 years or so but I've been curious what the Standings/Rankings would be over the last 20 years and I'll admit that I don't have the spreadsheet skills to create a proper list, especially with how the expansion teams come into the frey.
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 |  
Sure, I've got nothing else to do. Plugging away now, give me a bit.
 
I'll do last 20 completed seasons, so not including YTD 13-14. But including all seasons including shortened "complete" seasons due to labor. Sound OK?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 03:22 PM | #3 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I'm also just gonna summarize each season by points. Not going to bother showing Wins, Losses, etc. each season. Though each season will be on a tab.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 03:46 PM | #4 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Half done.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 04:14 PM | #5 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Should have said "done half the seasons". It gets a little sticky as teams drop off from expansion. More time consuming. Working on 96-97 now.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 04:18 PM | #6 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Behind Nikkor Glass      | 
 
			
			I can't wait for the next non completed update.     |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 04:26 PM | #7 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Things overheard as I put this together: 
"Oh thanks for completely changing the naming style in 96-97 NHL.   "
 
"Florida had 92 points one season?!"
 
3 seasons to go!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 04:54 PM | #8 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
				  
 
			
			OK, so here's the list of teams and point totals. Teams shown are in their current locations. So the Winnipeg in the list is the franchise including the Thrashers totals, the Phoenix listed includes the Winnipeg totals from the WHA merger until the move, etc. I'm sure you guys can figure it out. 
Including just the raw point totals obviously penalizes the expansion teams, as they did not play as many games.
 
	Code: Team		Total
DETROIT	        2076
NEW JERSEY	1911
DALLAS	        1839
PHILADELPHIA	1824
COLORADO	1811
PITTSBURGH	1782
BOSTON	        1768
VANCOUVER	1759
ST. LOUIS	1745
BUFFALO	        1736
WASHINGTON	1710
TORONTO	        1693
MONTRÉAL	1685
SAN JOSE	1675
NY RANGERS	1668
CHICAGO	        1662
CALGARY	        1645
OTTAWA	        1612
PHOENIX	        1601
LOS ANGELES	1584
CAROLINA	1560
ANAHEIM	        1543
EDMONTON	1505
FLORIDA	        1448
NY ISLANDERS	1435
TAMPA BAY	1424
NASHVILLE	1186
MINNESOTA	1000
WINNIPEG	942
COLUMBUS	858 
So here's the same list, sorted by PPG.
 
	Code: Team		Total	          PPG
DETROIT	        2076	          1.252
NEW JERSEY	1911	          1.153
DALLAS	        1839	          1.109
PHILADELPHIA	1824	          1.100
COLORADO	1811	          1.092
PITTSBURGH	1782	          1.075
BOSTON	        1768	          1.066
NASHVILLE	1186	          1.065
VANCOUVER	1759	          1.061
MINNESOTA	1000	          1.053
ST. LOUIS	1745	          1.052
BUFFALO	        1736	          1.047
WASHINGTON	1710	          1.031
TORONTO	        1693	          1.021
MONTRÉAL	1685	          1.016
SAN JOSE	1675	          1.010
NY RANGERS	1668	          1.006
CHICAGO	        1662	          1.002
CALGARY	        1645	          0.992
ANAHEIM	        1543	          0.980
OTTAWA	        1612	          0.972
PHOENIX	        1601	          0.966
LOS ANGELES	1584	          0.955
CAROLINA	1560	          0.941
FLORIDA	        1448	          0.920
WINNIPEG	942	          0.913
EDMONTON	1505	          0.908
COLUMBUS	858	          0.903
NY ISLANDERS	1435	          0.866
TAMPA BAY	1424	          0.859 
tl;dr - Detroit is pretty good at hockey. Edmonton has been bad for 20 years. The Flames are in the middle tier.
 
I might save the whole thing as a Google Doc if anyone cares.
		
				 Last edited by TurnedTheCorner; 01-04-2014 at 04:57 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  
Acey,
 
Badgers Nose ,
 
bomber317 ,
 
Devils'Advocate ,
 
dissentowner ,
 
FireInTheHole ,
 
flamesfever ,
 
FLAMESRULE ,
 
Flashpoint ,
 
GreenHardHat ,
 
Mike F ,
 
mikephoen ,
 
Resolute 14 ,
 
ricosuave ,
 
RisebroughRuinedMyYouth ,
 
Roof-Daddy ,
 
scottie ,
 
Textcritic ,
 
The Fonz ,
 
The Swedish Flame |  
	
		
	
	
 
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:19 PM | #10 |  
	| Not the 1 millionth post winnar 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Los Angeles      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner  I might save the whole thing as a Google Doc if anyone cares.
 |  
Please do!  That would be a great resource to have.
		 
				__________________"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.
 
 Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
 -Bax
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Flashpoint For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:22 PM | #11 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I still get a little fuzzy on how sharing and ownership works on Google Docs / Drive, so let me know if this link doesn't work.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...kE&usp=sharing |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:46 PM | #12 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Behind Nikkor Glass      | 
 
			
			It sent the request permission back to you.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:46 PM | #13 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Should be able to view now.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:51 PM | #14 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Tampa Bay with the worst overall point percentage the last 20 years, and yet they managed to win a Cup........and even worse it was against us.
 Also, Carolina, Anaheim and L.A. all below us in point percentage but have a Cup in that time.......Chicago one spot above us, and have two Cups.
 
 Finally, boy do Poile and Trotz ever do a fantastic job down in Nashville. Incredible really. Almost a shame that they couldn't have won the Cup when they had that strong team back in 06/07.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:56 PM | #15 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I thought it was interesting that in the bottom tier (21-30) teams of the last 20 years, there have still been three cup wins. Not as many as the middle tier (5) or top tier (12), but better than nothing. 
Just get int the playoffs, and anything can happen!    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 05:58 PM | #16 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			This was the last 20 years right? 
I added Cup wins in parenthesis on the side since the Rangers Cup win in 93/94.
 
	Code: Team		Total	          PPG
DETROIT	        2076	          1.252 (4)
NEW JERSEY	1911	          1.153 (3)
DALLAS	        1839	          1.109 (1)
PHILADELPHIA	1824	          1.100
COLORADO	1811	          1.092 (2)
PITTSBURGH	1782	          1.075 (1)
BOSTON	        1768	          1.066 (1)
NASHVILLE	1186	          1.065
VANCOUVER	1759	          1.061
MINNESOTA	1000	          1.053
ST. LOUIS	1745	          1.052
BUFFALO	        1736	          1.047
WASHINGTON	1710	          1.031
TORONTO	        1693	          1.021
MONTRÉAL	1685	          1.016 (1)
SAN JOSE	1675	          1.010
NY RANGERS	1668	          1.006 (1)
CHICAGO	        1662	          1.002 (2)
CALGARY	        1645	          0.992
ANAHEIM	        1543	          0.980 (1)
OTTAWA	        1612	          0.972
PHOENIX	        1601	          0.966
LOS ANGELES	1584	          0.955 (1)
CAROLINA	1560	          0.941 (1)
FLORIDA	        1448	          0.920
WINNIPEG	942	          0.913
EDMONTON	1505	          0.908
COLUMBUS	858	          0.903
NY ISLANDERS	1435	          0.866
TAMPA BAY	1424	          0.859 (1)
				 Last edited by Roof-Daddy; 01-04-2014 at 08:18 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 06:02 PM | #17 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			All seasons completed since 92-93, so the Canadiens get credit for one as well.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 06:15 PM | #18 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			Toronto doesn't seem as bad as I imagine they would have been. I was surprised to see that they have a higher PPG than us.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 06:29 PM | #19 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner  Sure, I've got nothing else to do. Plugging away now, give me a bit.
 I'll do last 20 completed seasons, so not including YTD 13-14. But including all seasons including shortened "complete" seasons due to labor. Sound OK?
 |  
You are awesome. I thought this was a green txt post. Lol
 
Mega props!
 
Man, we sure have sucked over the last 20 years.
		 
				 Last edited by Badgers Nose; 01-04-2014 at 06:32 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-04-2014, 06:35 PM | #20 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			One area where the team has no cap is management. Why don't the Flames go get guys like Holland and Babcock? Offer them a stupid amount of money. That money will ensure that the. Flames get the most from the 68 (and counting) million dollar payroll.
 Flames are never going to be better than a bottom ten team unless they hire the best managers.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM. | 
 
 
 |