[GT] Flames @ Sabres

[Igster]

Originally Posted by Canada 02

these two crap teams would look better in 6 hours

Better than this.

[PeteMoss]

Originally Posted by Robo

I really don't understand all the Sportsnet complaining

There goes that not being drunk prediction.

[nik-]

I have a feeling Sportsnet is going to take a "this is the talent that got us this deal!" mentality for at least the first year. They'll try to be loyal to these guys and it will be comical.

Rogers, your wallet got you the deal in spite of the talent. Please know this.

[Oling_Roachinen]

Originally Posted by Robo

I really don't understand all the Sportsnet complaining

The colour was very clearly off and we missed 10 seconds of a PP because the video feed cut out. Those are legitimate complaints for any channel.

[nik-]

Originally Posted by lifetimefan

OT: That sort of happened to a guy I worked with in the 80's. He came in just for the summer and evidently was still living at home. While he was away, his parents sold the house and moved. They had no way of reaching him, though.

When he went "home", his key wouldn't work, so he broke a window to get in, thought his folks had bought new furniture, and passed out on the couch.

He woke up the next morning to a pair of cops ready to arrest him for squatting.

That, while hilarious, is not really the same thing at all

[Haplo]

Originally Posted by Robo

I really don't understand all the Sportsnet complaining

Me neither. The Kerr bashing is ridiculous. I've never been annoyed by him. I think he's fairly entertaining to listen to.

[Barnet Flame]

Haha!

That tops my effort of getting hammered at a party, for some reason deciding to go for a coffee at 7-11 and returning back to find everything all quiet as I went to sleep.

My buddy then woke me up from my slumber on the next door neighbour's couch.

[Cuz]

Originally Posted by Haplo

Me neither. The Kerr bashing is ridiculous. I've never been annoyed by him. I think he's fairly entertaining to listen to.

I think the problem with Kerr is he tries too hard to be fancy with his play-calling. He needs to keep the KISS principle in mind and I think he would be a lot better.

[puckluck2]

Can someone explain the no goal?

[bubbsy]

these games are just getting tougher to sit thru. the quality of hockey is just so poor.

i look forward to the xmas trade freeze being lifted.

[lifetimefan]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

Can someone explain the no goal?

Buffalo had a delayed penalty, so Ramo was coming off.
Both Glencross and Russel jumped on, so too many men, and it was called back.

[FFR]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

Can someone explain the no goal?

I'm not sure if you are being serious or not - but the Flames scored with six men on the ice when they should only have had five. Two many men = no goal.

[getbak]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

Can someone explain the no goal?

Too many men. The Flames were killing a penalty but had 6 guys on the ice.

[Da_Chief]

Haha Stajan.

[Robo]

Bouma is great

[Haplo]

Originally Posted by Cuz

I think the problem with Kerr is he tries too hard to be fancy with his play-calling. He needs to keep the KISS principle in mind and I think he would be a lot better.

That's what makes it entertaining! You never know what he's gonna say. But I guess some people take the commentating a lot more serious than I do.

[ricosuave]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

Can someone explain the no goal?

sure, we had 7 guys on the ice

[getbak]

McGrattan, Colborne, and Bouma. There's some beef for Burke.

[lifetimefan]

Yeah, but Kerr isn't just a little different.
It's more like, I can't believe he just said that.

[getbak]

Why the hell does crap keep falling from the ceiling?