Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-01-2013, 05:41 PM   #521
expatflame
Formerly FlamesFaninChina
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Thailand
Exp:
Default

Question-are either Monahan or Lindholm "NHL ready" for next season or do you think either would have to spend some time in the AHL?
expatflame is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 05:44 PM   #522
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Monahan might be close. Lindholm is playing next season in Sweden. NHL ready shouldn't be a big concern for us right now anyway.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 05-01-2013, 05:44 PM   #523
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatflame View Post
Question-are either Monahan or Lindholm "NHL ready" for next season or do you think either would have to spend some time in the AHL?
I think there is a small chance Monahan comes and almost no chance that Lindholm does.

If Monahan came I think it would be more because of the Flames need at center than fully on him being ready to come.
moon is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 05-01-2013, 05:47 PM   #524
thymebalm
#1 Goaltender
 
thymebalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I don't see the point in moving up the three spots it would take. You are getting at number 6 one of these players:

Lindholm (3rd overall Euro skater NHLE=40pts/82gp)
Monahan (3rd overall N.A. Forward NHLE=33p/82gp)
Nichushkin (2nd overall Euro skater NHLE=28p/82gp)
Nurse (2nd over N.A. Defender NHLE=15p/82 *NHLE doesn't really work the same for defenders, as in, it doesn't.)

Lindholm appears to have more offensive instincts, but Im not convinced any of Nurse/Lindholm/Monahan is a bad choice. And it won't cost us anything.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
thymebalm is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 06:06 PM   #525
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thymebalm View Post
I don't see the point in moving up the three spots it would take. You are getting at number 6 one of these players:

Lindholm (3rd overall Euro skater NHLE=40pts/82gp)
Monahan (3rd overall N.A. Forward NHLE=33p/82gp)
Nichushkin (2nd overall Euro skater NHLE=28p/82gp)
Nurse (2nd over N.A. Defender NHLE=15p/82 *NHLE doesn't really work the same for defenders, as in, it doesn't.)

Lindholm appears to have more offensive instincts, but Im not convinced any of Nurse/Lindholm/Monahan is a bad choice. And it won't cost us anything.
Any of those 3 sounds great to me, thought eh Russian scares me. Nurse sounds awesome, Monahan sounds like what we need, and Lindholm sounds like something we need even more. Really can't go wrong here.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 07:56 PM   #526
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Drafting is just one part of the equation; development is the other.

Calgary needs to give these guys the time and space to develop, to put them into a position to succeed. If that means a year or two in the minors, they need to do that rather than ruin a kid's confidence...
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
Old 05-01-2013, 08:00 PM   #527
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
hmmm, maybe Monahan is the Flames' guy.
I imagine that the Button brothers share a lot of information. If Craig has the Flames picking Monahan one has to think that as of now he's they player they will pick if they stay at 6.
Erick Estrada is online now  
Old 05-01-2013, 09:12 PM   #528
GoFlamesGo1989
Crash and Bang Winger
 
GoFlamesGo1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Exp:
Default

Monahan is exactly the player we need to draft. We have a bunch of skill we need two way elite centers.

Bergeron, Kesler, Toews and Staal. 3/4 have won a cup.

Chalk me up praying for Monahan to be our pick.
GoFlamesGo1989 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GoFlamesGo1989 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-01-2013, 09:31 PM   #529
Captain_Obvious
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

The more I think about it, I'd like to see us try and trade the St. Louis and Pens firsts for the Oiler's first.

The thought of snagging Monahan - and - Lindholm would he huge.

Monahan / Lindhold and Backlund as our trio of centres moving forward (with Janowski potentially coming down the pipe in a few years ) would be a huge reversal of fortunes down the middle.
Captain_Obvious is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Captain_Obvious For This Useful Post:
Old 05-01-2013, 09:58 PM   #530
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drPepper1 View Post
Button's mock draft:

Carolina: Nurse
Flames: Monahan
Oilers: Lindholm
Sabres: Nichuskin
That settles it. Flames prefer Monahan forsure with Craig having inside information.
puckluck2 is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 10:11 PM   #531
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Whoever the Flames pick, PLEASE turn into a top center! If they pick Monahan, PLEASE don't let him go all Rob Niedemayer on us.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 10:12 PM   #532
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
This is the statement I disagree with. You are using the chart without recalibrating based on the standard talent distribution curve of the NHL vs the NFL. This is along the lines of the exampe of trying to draft 10 year olds with the same model but not as extreme.

Additionally it ignores that scouts statements that there is a top 4 that is better and a top 7-9 that is better with discrete drop offs between the groups. Since we know these things you cant just say it should only take a 3rd round pick based on this chart.

I will agree with you that in general establishing a drafte value ranking system is possible with calibration based on the curve for that particular sport which can be used to quickly evaluate a winner or overpayment. However your above statement is not supported by the model you are using.
I only posted that as a point of reference from another league (and stated as much). I never claimed that it should be the actual price in this case (nor would I).

I also explained, more than once, that those types of statistical references are line-of-best-fit guidelines. That means that data points rarely (and only coincidentally) actually fall on the line. Each data point has its own circumstances and facts that separate it - the line of best fit is merely the sum of least variables, it never claims to be a 'correct' number in any and all circumstances. And your drop-off after #4 is a good example of that in practice.

Also, similar to what opendoor said, a buyer would typically have to pay a premium, especially in the NHL where there are fewer transactions and thus the bid/ask spread, or buyer's premium can be more significant.
Enoch Root is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 10:23 PM   #533
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Monahan's shot is interesting to watch and seems unlike a lot of players. There seems to be very little unnecessary movement - most of his goals seem to be these little wrist shots with a short follow through - just seems to pick his spot and slide it in with ease.

__________________
Trust the snake.

Last edited by Bunk; 05-01-2013 at 10:29 PM.
Bunk is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 05-02-2013, 08:30 AM   #534
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

The following table shows Monahan compared to every OHL first round pick from 1998-2008. Keeping in mind, he played on a very poor team with a minus -115 goal differential.

StrykerSteve is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 08:45 AM   #535
drPepper1
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
That settles it. Flames prefer Monahan forsure with Craig having inside information.
Hope he's wrong
drPepper1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:36 AM   #536
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
That settles it. Flames prefer Monahan forsure with Craig having inside information.
It might be one of those cases where, even if he knows, he deliberately doesn't pick the player.

Although it's hard to say since last year he had Faksa going to the Flames and he went 13th to Dallas:

http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=62451

And the year before he had Zack Phillips but perhaps only because Baertschi went off the board in his mock at 10:

http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=507
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:43 AM   #537
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious View Post
The more I think about it, I'd like to see us try and trade the St. Louis and Pens firsts for the Oiler's first.

The thought of snagging Monahan - and - Lindholm would he huge.

Monahan / Lindhold and Backlund as our trio of centres moving forward (with Janowski potentially coming down the pipe in a few years ) would be a huge reversal of fortunes down the middle.

I'd like to see us try and do that as well but do not see Edmonton making that trade.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:46 AM   #538
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious View Post
The more I think about it, I'd like to see us try and trade the St. Louis and Pens firsts for the Oiler's first.

The thought of snagging Monahan - and - Lindholm would he huge.

Monahan / Lindhold and Backlund as our trio of centres moving forward (with Janowski potentially coming down the pipe in a few years ) would be a huge reversal of fortunes down the middle.
That seems like the opposite of what MacTavish said he wanted to do. He could change his mind but it seems doubtful he is trading what could be an impact player to the Flames for two picks that likely result in nothing and certainly don't help the team for the next two years.

I think if MacTavish moves that pick it is to try and move up or more likely to get a roster player.
moon is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:49 AM   #539
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Given the unlikely scenario where Nurse/Nichushkin go 4th/5th, it would be interesting to see the poll results after adding Barkov to the Lindholm/Monahan discussion.

Overwhelmingly in favor of Barkov?
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:59 AM   #540
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Thinking about it a little bit more over the last couple of days, I actually wouldn't mind drafting Nurse either. Yes, we have issues with our centre prospects, but I think we have bigger issues on defence.

Next season we have Stajan, Backlund and Horak as our top 3 centres... not the best in the league, but definitely not horrible. Backlund and Stajan are both capable 2nd line guys and Horak has proven he belongs in the NHL. Both Horak and Backlund are young enough that you can expect they will take a step forward in the next few years. Plus we also have Jankowski, which is a wild card right now and whoever else we draft with our remaining 2 first round picks.

If our scouting staff feels that Nurse can be a franchise defenceman a la Weber and Lindholm/Monahan will just be decent centres a la Backlund/Stajan... then I would go with Nurse 10 times out of 10. We already have the decent, underwhelming centres... we don't have a franchise defenceman.
_Q_ is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy