Questionable things Feaster has said/done as GM of the Flames

[VladtheImpaler]

Originally Posted by zamler

So it's not a lie, if you believe it?

[FAN]

Originally Posted by zamler

So it's not a lie, if you believe it?

Sometimes there is a fine line and it depends on what it is. For example, if Feaster did tell ownership to find someone else if they wanted a GM to rebuild the team then no he didn't lie. My point is there are posters who are trying to make excuses for Feaster as if he's forced to toe the company line, but that necessarily suggests that Feaster has been lying. I don't think Feaster has been lying all that much if at all. I think he's full of crap and contradict himself constantly.

[zamler]

I think Feaster will say anything to tow the company line and keep his job, which is fine to an extent. But I would rather have a guy that draws the line in the sand and says, I will do what is best for the hockey club the way I see it, if you don't like it then find someone else.

[Erick Estrada]

Originally Posted by Badgers Nose

In other threads you've complained that ownership has too much input into the day-to-day operations of the team. Are you now suggesting that they should be even more involved?

Well seeing how I consider them the main issue it's pretty obvious that I would want them less involved.

[Joborule]

Feaster saying Baertschi will be on the club this season, when he clearly isn't strong enough for the NHL yet plus below on the depth chart.

[1stLand]

Oh Feaster.
You funny guy