| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2013, 11:31 PM | #181 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			^^^    
There's some pretty good players on your list who have no chance of being bought out.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to puckluck2 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:19 AM | #182 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The Void between Darkness and Light      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by handgroen  the following players are from what i can tell candidates to be bought out and definitely interest me
 heatley
 koivu
 brier
 hossa
 havlat
 Leino
 Myers
 erhoff
 gorges
 laich
 green
 liles
 lecavelier
 j. williams
 franzen
 martin
 gleason
 umberger
 beachemin
 gaustad
 b. campbell
 |  
Ohlund
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:34 AM | #183 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			I think Yzerman has to buy out Lecavelier given this opportunity.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:39 AM | #184 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sylvanfan  Really starting next year, the Flames have to move away from Iginla and Kiprusoff whether they want to or not. If ownership really is willing to spend whatever they need to fix the team, they should buy out Wideman because it would get them long term cap flexibility. The team would have a pretty clean slate heading into the 2014 offseason if Kiprusoff, Cammalleri, Wideman, and Bouwmeesters contracts clear out. |  
Wideman is going to have to be really terrible for the Flames to buy him out after just giving him that deal.  A lot of people tend to forget that Feaster didn't just pull his name out of the UFA bag in June.  He was a player that Feaster, Weisbrod, pro scouting and Hartley all agreed was a good fit for this team.  If Wideman is as bad as some of you think he will be this doesn't bode well for the direction of the Flames.  I tend to believe he will be okay myself.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:40 AM | #185 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Cool Ville      | 
 
			
			yup Lecavelier, and then feaster will sign him for a second time.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:41 AM | #186 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: STH since 2002      | 
 
			
			First post for 2013 might as well stay consistant. The Flames should buy out Stajan if with Cervenka being gone for who knows how long with this blood medical issue.Take advantage of this out and buy out Stajan.
 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:42 AM | #187 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			I think that if the Flames can't trade Stajan to a team that can benefit from lower actual dollars compared to his cap hit, he will be bought out this summer. 
 I'm more interested to see who else around league gets bought out, and if some of these buy outs create an opportunity for the Flames to acquire a quality player who was just carrying a scary contract.
 
 For example, some have mentioned Lecavalier or Hossa potentially being bought out.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:47 AM | #188 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by handgroen  the following players are from what i can tell candidates to be bought out and definitely interest me
 heatley - No chance
 koivu - Why bother
 brier - No chance
 hossa - HAHAHAHAHAHA
 havlat - No chance
 Leino - This would be interesting.
 Myers - Absolutely no chance in hell
 erhoff - No chance
 gorges - Nope
 laich - Why would you even think this.
 green - They just re-signed him, wtf?
 liles - Why?
 lecavelier - Maybe.
 j. williams - No chance
 franzen - Hahahahahaha
 martin - Doubt it but interesting idea.
 gleason - Didn't they just sign him?
 umberger - There is no one else in CBJ, no.
 beachemin - No, 3.5 is a reasonable hit.
 gaustad - Stupid contract but doubt it.
 b. campbell - Was an all star, but maybe next summer if things don't go well.
 |  
Almost none of those guys are getting bought out and you didn't even mention the obvious ones like Ballard and Stajan.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:48 AM | #189 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			If you told me we could sacrifice 32 games of the season to be able to cancel Ville Leino's contract... I'd have probably been okay with it.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 09:58 AM | #190 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Anybody know when the buy-out period begins?  Is it before free agency?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:06 AM | #191 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			It will be interesting to see what happens, but I'll be surprised if we see any buyouts on the really long-term deals.
 If the Lightning buy out Lecavalier, they'll still have to pay him $2.1M per year for the next 14 years. They might still be forced to do it to be able to ice a full roster next season, but that's a lot of money to be paying out and getting nothing for it.
 
 
 I think the more likely buyouts will be the guys in the latter years of long-term deals that are now making much less than their cap hits (although, those guys are also potential trade bait to floor teams like the Islanders and Coyotes).
 
 
 I'd say that the only sure bets for buyouts are Redden and Gomez.
 
				__________________Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:08 AM | #192 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: STH since 2002      | 
 
			
			If a player is bought out does he become a FA then?
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:09 AM | #193 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: City by the Bay      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Stay Golden  If a player is bought out does he become a FA then? |  
Yes with the team that bought him out being the only ineligible team to sign him (with normal buyouts and, I assume, the 2 non-compliance buyouts).
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:36 AM | #194 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube  If you told me we could sacrifice 32 games of the season to be able to cancel Ville Leino's contract... I'd have probably been okay with it. |  
You have to figure that will happen.  Still not sure what Regier was thinking on that deal.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:40 AM | #195 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			In regards to Luongo why would any team trade for him knowing that the Canucks only have a small handful of teams Luongo will accept a trade to and if they can't trade him they will be forced to buy him out? If you are the Leafs or Panthers wouldn't you rather just wait until he hits free agency so you can sign him at a more appropritate contract seeing you know you are on his short list already? I just don't see the logic of any team trading assets for that boat anchor contract when they know that the Canucks will have to buy him out. It's win-win as they don't have to give up anything and they get an above average goaltender signed to an appropriate deal.
		 
				 Last edited by Erick Estrada; 01-07-2013 at 10:42 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:43 AM | #196 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by AR_Six  Almost none of those guys are getting bought out and you didn't even mention the obvious ones like Ballard and Stajan. |  
every team is going to use this get out jail free card, so 2 players will be bought out league wide? stajan and ballard?
 
if not who else will be bought out? 
thanks
		 
				__________________  is your cat doing singing?  
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:43 AM | #197 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Will Canucks buy out Luongo or Ballard?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:45 AM | #198 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: City by the Bay      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Erick Estrada  In regards to Luongo why would any team trade for him knowing that the Canucks only have a small handful of teams Luongo will accept a trade to and if they can't trade him they will be forced to buy him out? If you are the Leafs or Panthers wouldn't you rather just wait until he hits free agency so you can sign him at a more appropritate contract seeing you know you are on his short list already? I just don't see the logic of any team trading assets for that boat anchor contract when they know that the Canucks will have to buy him out. It's win-win as they don't have to give up anything and they get an above average goaltender signed to an appropriate deal. |  
Agreed, unless an additional asset flows from the Canucks to the team that trades for Luongo to make it worth it to that team. The Leafs and Panthers can wait for Luongo to be bought out and then it's a simple matter of reaching a term/rate that's agreeable to both sides.
 
Would a higher level pick or prospect be an adequate asset to make that horrid contract worthwhile?
		 
				 Last edited by Clever_Iggy; 01-07-2013 at 10:48 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:51 AM | #199 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The Void between Darkness and Light      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Tinordi  Will Canucks buy out Luongo or Ballard? |  
Ballard this year, Luongo next.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2013, 10:52 AM | #200 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Erick Estrada  In regards to Luongo why would any team trade for him knowing that the Canucks only have a small handful of teams Luongo will accept a trade to and if they can't trade him they will be forced to buy him out? If you are the Leafs or Panthers wouldn't you rather just wait until he hits free agency so you can sign him at a more appropritate contract seeing you know you are on his short list already? I just don't see the logic of any team trading assets for that boat anchor contract when they know that the Canucks will have to buy him out. It's win-win as they don't have to give up anything and they get an above average goaltender signed to an appropriate deal. |  
The only problem with that is that there are at least 2 teams that want him. If the Leafs wait for a buy out then they know he will probably sign in Florida, unless they offer a bunch of money, probably a lot more than his current cap hit. If the Leafs want Luongo then it makes sense for them to trade for him.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM. | 
 
 
 |