11-02-2012, 07:39 PM
|
#281
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spuds_Buckley
I see everyone seems to be jumping on the Browns wagon but I'll toss out some stats to stir the pot:
1. Ravens have not lost back-to-back games since 2009
2. Flacco's career QB rating after a loss is 102.2
3. Ravens are 4-0 after a bye under Harbaugh.
So yes, they are banged up... but my money's going on B'more
|
I put little or no value into gambling trends from anything longer then this season. Ravens are clearly a much different team then past years and their defense is in the bottom tier of the league. Especially the small sample size of 4 games, where we are not given home/away strength of opponent and so on.
I still like Baltimore to cover this weekend. As much as we can pick apart the mess of this Ravens team, the Browns are the furthest thing from a sure thing.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:48 AM
|
#282
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Alright, I need some hedging advice. I played a TOTO ticket out here (similar to pools except you have to factor in "ties" where games are decided by 3 points or less). I went 11/12 yesterday, leaving me with the Monday night game. It's not a perfect 13/13, but both 12 and 11 will pay out here.
On average, getting 12 has been paying out $16,675.30. However there have been some outliers. On the low side, 12 paid out $84.45, $331.4, and $478.71. On the high side, it's paid out $82,584.20.
I should be hedging at least $500, right? It's only paying less than a grand 37% of the time.
Last edited by rubecube; 11-05-2012 at 09:51 AM.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:53 AM
|
#283
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Alright, I need some hedging advice. I played a TOTO ticket out here (similar to pools except you have to factor in "ties" where games are decided by 3 points or less). I went 11/12 yesterday, leaving me with the Monday night game. It's not a perfect 13/13, but both 12 and 11 will pay out here.
On average, getting 12 has been paying out $16,675.30. However there have been some outliers. On the low side, 12 paid out $84.45, $331.4, and $478.71. On the high side, it's paid out $82,584.20.
I should be hedging at least $1000, right? It's only paying less than a grand 37% of the time.
|
Did you take New Orleans?
Eagles are +3 you could try and middle it at +3.5 and win both. $1000 sounds right.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:54 AM
|
#284
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Did you take New Orleans?
Eagles are +3 you could try and middle it at +3.5 and win both. $1000 sounds right.
|
Took the Eagles. In retrospect, this was the game we should've blocked off instead of PIT/NYG. Forgot to add that I split pool winnings with a friend, so I think $500 is a better number.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 11:03 AM
|
#285
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Took the Eagles. In retrospect, this was the game we should've blocked off instead of PIT/NYG. Forgot to add that I split pool winnings with a friend, so I think $500 is a better number.
|
Yikes. Saints are 1.68. So you're hedging $1000 to get $680, $500 to get $340.. not really worth it.
I'd let it ride. Hedgeing is for wimps. Saints are going to win anyways.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:19 PM
|
#286
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
sorry that made absolutely no sense... I keep thinking you took the Saints.
Eagles are going to win anyways!!!!!
......
Do you have live betting? The only thing I can think of is if the Eagles take the lead (like 3-0) and then the odds even up a bit, then you can hedge. If the Saints take the lead, I think you're hooped either way.
Also keep in mind that since the Eagles are the underdog, less people took them. So a 12 win share with an Eagles win will have more money in it than a 12 win share with the Saints in it. Hedgeing might be worth it but the odds of 1.68 are just too low.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
Last edited by GirlySports; 11-05-2012 at 12:21 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:33 PM
|
#287
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
sorry that made absolutely no sense... I keep thinking you took the Saints.
Eagles are going to win anyways!!!!!
......
Do you have live betting? The only thing I can think of is if the Eagles take the lead (like 3-0) and then the odds even up a bit, then you can hedge. If the Saints take the lead, I think you're hooped either way.
Also keep in mind that since the Eagles are the underdog, less people took them. So a 12 win share with an Eagles win will have more money in it than a 12 win share with the Saints in it. Hedgeing might be worth it but the odds of 1.68 are just too low.
|
Yes, all very solid points. This ticket might not be worth very much this week anyways, since there were only three upsets and a tie, two of those upsets were fairly predictable I think as well (Tampa and Pittsburgh). That being said, according to Yahoo, 75% of the people like the Saints tonight, so it would be huge if the Eagles pull it off (knock on wood).
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:35 PM
|
#288
|
Nostradamus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London Ont.
|
I was up $70 yesterday. Made 6 - $25 bets.
Pit win - right
Cin win - wrong
Ind win - right
TB cover - right
Det cover - right
4 game parlay:
Bal, GB, Chi and Was all to cover - 1st 3 did, Washington did not. That $25 paid $319 and change.
Bet $150, won $220 and change.
For the year I am about $500 up now.
__________________
agggghhhhhh!!!
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:51 PM
|
#289
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Normally the large spreads are one's to stay away from...but I think New England -11 and Pittsburgh -11.5 are still no brainers to me.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:59 PM
|
#290
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Got in early on STL +11, HOU +1, and SEA -6.5 for next weekend.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:16 PM
|
#291
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Yes, all very solid points. This ticket might not be worth very much this week anyways, since there were only three upsets and a tie, two of those upsets were fairly predictable I think as well (Tampa and Pittsburgh). That being said, according to Yahoo, 75% of the people like the Saints tonight, so it would be huge if the Eagles pull it off (knock on wood).
|
Would Indy have been an upset too?
I took the Browns on my Pools ticket
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:19 PM
|
#292
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Would Indy have been an upset too?
I took the Browns on my Pools ticket 
|
No, Indy would've been considered a tie. I'm royally pissed at myself for taking the Skins. I had Panthers all the way and changed my mind last second.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 10:29 PM
|
#293
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Stupid ####ing Eagles.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-06-2012, 07:11 AM
|
#294
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
wow
Quote:
There were 255 winning shares
matching 13 out of 13
for CARD 599
paying prizes of $1113.40 each.
|
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
11-06-2012, 09:30 AM
|
#295
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Yeah, it was very similar here in BC.
Quote:
Prize Category Winners Prize Total
13/13 165 $276.58 $45,635.70
12/13 2646 $17.25 $45,643.50
11/13 18122 $2.52 $45,667.44
Total 20933 $136,946.64
|
|
|
|
11-06-2012, 09:46 AM
|
#296
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CowTown
|
Money game of the week has to be Bears vs Texans, Spread should be minimal based on records and chicago being the home team, but of teams that chicago has beat the combined record is 20-36 Texans are gonna rout the bears sunday night.
Im Texans all day long
|
|
|
11-06-2012, 09:56 AM
|
#297
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papi34
Money game of the week has to be Bears vs Texans, Spread should be minimal based on records and chicago being the home team, but of teams that chicago has beat the combined record is 20-36 Texans are gonna rout the bears sunday night.
Im Texans all day long
|
^^This. That Texans' defensive line is gonna wreak havoc on the Bears.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-06-2012, 11:23 AM
|
#298
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papi34
Money game of the week has to be Bears vs Texans, Spread should be minimal based on records and chicago being the home team, but of teams that chicago has beat the combined record is 20-36 Texans are gonna rout the bears sunday night.
Im Texans all day long
|
Bears -1.5
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-07-2012, 12:10 PM
|
#299
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
http://network.yardbarker.com/all_sp...00000/12147040
Quote:
Woman Hits 15-Game Parlay At Red Rock In Vegas For $100,000!
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 12:12 PM
|
#300
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
Last week only went in on 4 games, games that I went in early in the week, as I got busy leading up to the weekend and then took off for a small road trip. Went 2-2 so still can't win, but not really losing. Oh well.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 AM.
|
|