Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
yeah it's just awful.
How does a countback system
A) not count who won more rounds
or
B) not count who won the last round.
Maybe I'm using my high jump logic here (most misses in the competition, then most misses in the last round). But a countback system where they don't tell you what the countback is! Of course it's rigged!
|
agree,
The truth of the matter is that really good boxers that can fight perimeter and inside, counter punch,use footwork to show different angles and deliver punches from several angles go on to become successful pros but in the Olympics rarley do they win or even compete at the Olympics.
The way this hokey punch count system is designed in which 1 judge can counter the other judges if he doesn't click his counter. The judging system at this level of boxing is broken.
But the IOC likes the boxing just fine this way so they can maintain control over this sport though the appointed judges. JMO.
The majority of the called boxers that manipulate this garbage in the Olympics and benefit from this crooked arangement of judging can't fight beyond that and have a very short shelf life as a pro because they really can't fight.
They become nothing more than local club fighters and pack it in once they have had their butt handed to them one to many times by a real pro.
Or they never fight again when their lame Olympic career is over.