Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 03-05-2012, 03:38 PM   #21
puckluck
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Easter back on in Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
To devil's advocate for a moment, I do think the "Dangers" of second hand smoke have been overblown. I think it's one matter if you are exposed to second hand smoke constantly in an enclosed environment. The occasional wiff of cigarette smoke outdoors may not be pleasant but it won't kill you. Think about it for a second. When someone is smoking they are burnign a piece of a tobacco leaf. How does that compare to the cars on the street that are burning litres upon litres of gasoline.
Are you an expert? I don't know how anyone without actually studying the matter can say it's overblown.
puckluck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:45 PM   #22
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck View Post
Are you an expert? I don't know how anyone without actually studying the matter can say it's overblown.
I've actually read quite a bit of the studies on it. Most of them point to the fact that even if you are a heavy smoker as long as quit before aged 35 you only have a marginaly higher chacne of getting lung cancer.

From a common sense point of view, if you think that the occasional wiff of second hand smoke is going to give you lung cancer you'd better stay away from any kind of an open flame or combustion...which is pretty much everywhere.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:45 PM   #23
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
When someone is smoking they are burnign a piece of a tobacco leaf. How does that compare to the cars on the street that are burning litres upon litres of gasoline.
Gasoline burns cleaner.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:46 PM   #24
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
The occasional wiff of cigarette smoke outdoors may not be pleasant but it won't kill you.
Why should anyone have to endure this unpleasant odor even if it wont kill you? Would you be okay with having a fat person fart in your face once a day? It wouldn't be pleasant but it wouldn't kill you so I guess you would be okay with it?
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:46 PM   #25
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

nm
__________________

Last edited by Dion; 03-05-2012 at 03:55 PM.
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:46 PM   #26
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well non-smokers will be safer in Edmonton now....I believe this got passed today.

A proposed city bylaw going before the Community Standards Committee Monday could mean that anyone caught smoking within 10 metres of a playground, outdoor skating rink, or sports field will face a fine.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to First Lady For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 03:51 PM   #27
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Secondhand smoke — also known as environmental tobacco smoke — includes the smoke that a smoker exhales (mainstream smoke) and the smoke that comes directly from the burning tobacco product (sidestream smoke). Secondhand smoke contains thousands of toxic chemicals, including:
  • Benzene
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Chromium
  • Cyanide
  • Formaldehyde
  • Lead
  • Nickel
  • Polonium
The dangerous particles in secondhand smoke can linger in the air for hours. Breathing secondhand smoke for a short time can irritate your lungs and reduce the amount of oxygen in your blood. Prolonged or repeated exposure to secondhand smoke is all the more dangerous. And it isn't just the smoke that's a concern. The residue that clings to a smoker's hair and clothing, as well as cushions, carpeting and other goods — sometimes referred to as thirdhand smoke — also can pose risks, especially for children.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/sec...-smoke/CC00023
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:54 PM   #28
puckluck
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Easter back on in Vancouver
Exp:
Default

12 years ago I was on a plane which allowed smoking.

Words can not describe the murderous rampage I wanted to go on. I can't believe only recently smoking in public was outlawed.
puckluck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:54 PM   #29
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
I've actually read quite a bit of the studies on it. Most of them point to the fact that even if you are a heavy smoker as long as quit before aged 35 you only have a marginaly higher chacne of getting lung cancer.

From a common sense point of view, if you think that the occasional wiff of second hand smoke is going to give you lung cancer you'd better stay away from any kind of an open flame or combustion...which is pretty much everywhere.
You must have read some pretty garbage studies if you think that "When someone is smoking they are burnign a piece of a tobacco leaf" is anything but an incredibly misleading statement.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 04:15 PM   #30
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

The vast majority of those chemicals are natural by-products of incompletely burning hydrocarbons. They will be found in burn. The heavy metals are from pesticides and will be found in only very trace amounts. The amount you would expect to breath in from difused second hand smoke is pretty neglible.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:16 PM   #31
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
You must have read some pretty garbage studies if you think that "When someone is smoking they are burnign a piece of a tobacco leaf" is anything but an incredibly misleading statement.
Please explain to me how its differnt then.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:17 PM   #32
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:18 PM   #33
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Why should anyone have to endure this unpleasant odor even if it wont kill you? Would you be okay with having a fat person fart in your face once a day? It wouldn't be pleasant but it wouldn't kill you so I guess you would be okay with it?
This is the root of it. People don't like it and want to stop other people from doing it.

So then they go and make up a bunch of BS "scientific arguments" to gain the moral high ground. If you don't like it, just say so. There's no reason to exaggerate the ill effects of second hand smoke.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:18 PM   #34
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Farting is obnoxious. We don't make people stand outside if they want to rip ass. I'm sure some people don't appreciate walking out onto the street when a diesel truck pulls away and they get a whiff of it.

I'm just wondering who exactly we're protecting, and who exactly has been killed by this menace. You're breathing in such trace amounts, how exactly is it any more carcinogenic than a twinkie?
It might not be, but I don't want to be force fed twinkies without having a say in it either.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:21 PM   #35
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Please explain to me how its differnt then.
http://www.tobacco.org/Resources/599ingredients.html

That's a list of the ingredients added to cigarettes.

But you're right, it's totally just some dried up tobacco leaves
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 04:23 PM   #36
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck View Post
12 years ago I was on a plane which allowed smoking.
Same (16 years ago) and to make matters worse, it was an alcohol free long haul flight.
__________________


Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:25 PM   #37
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Why should anyone have to endure this unpleasant odor even if it wont kill you?
We talking about smoke or perfume/aftershave?
__________________


Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:25 PM   #38
NuclearFart
First Line Centre
 
NuclearFart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
The vast majority of those chemicals are natural by-products of incompletely burning hydrocarbons. They will be found in burn. The heavy metals are from pesticides and will be found in only very trace amounts. The amount you would expect to breath in from difused second hand smoke is pretty neglible.
Do you run your car in a closed room you simultaneously occupy? And why are you only focusing on lung cancer outcomes? Smoking is causative in a ton of other health ailments like COPD, heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, high blood pressure, other cancers (bladder cancer is actually more common than lung), anemia, cavities...etc.
NuclearFart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:28 PM   #39
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
If it's within the prescribed non-smoking area at a doorway it's very much not legal
i meant that generally speaking smoking is legal......as an aside, it also amuses me when governemnt sue tobacco companies for health care costs - the gov't knows that smoking is bad and thye allow it......

the list of stuff in darts also makes me laugh. i have always wondered about the taste test process, no #25 need more amonium nitrate #2, #26 has too much benzie propanol #13.......
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:28 PM   #40
TheSutterDynasty
First Line Centre
 
TheSutterDynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
This is the root of it. People don't like it and want to stop other people from doing it.

So then they go and make up a bunch of BS "scientific arguments" to gain the moral high ground. If you don't like it, just say so. There's no reason to exaggerate the ill effects of second hand smoke.
You're also the poster who said that we don't know the mechanism of heart disease.

I don't think people should pay any attention to anything you post about science or health. Why don't you leave it to the experts.
__________________
ech·o cham·ber
/ˈekō ˌCHāmbər/
noun

An environment in which a person encounters only beliefs or opinions that coincide with their own, so that their existing views are reinforced and alternative ideas are not considered.
TheSutterDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TheSutterDynasty For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy