| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:39 PM | #561 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Oh no Ryan, no no no.  Pick 6.
		 
				__________________KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:40 PM | #562 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 Location: @HOOT250      | 
 
			
			And goodnight ATL!
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by henriksedin33  Not at all, as I've said, I would rather  start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams.  Bunch of  underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in  the playoffs. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:41 PM | #563 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Nice end to the half..need to keep it up though.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:41 PM | #564 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Terrible decision there.  The risk was so high and for what? 5 yards?
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:50 PM | #565 |  
	| Appealing my suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Just outside Enemy Lines      | 
 
			
			I think the Packers just punched their Superbowl ticket right there.  They'll get a TD to open up the 2nd half, and at 35-14 they won't blow that lead.  
 Hey Tranny...you happy they got rid of Farve now and kept Rogers?
 
				__________________"Some guys like old balls"
 Patriots QB Tom Brady
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 07:54 PM | #567 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Red Deer, AB      | 
 
			
			Tis what I was afraid of...
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:03 PM | #568 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Red Deer, AB      | 
 
			
			To me, Atlanta's defense was keeping them out of the elite NFC team discussion all year long. 
 Unfortunately for them, I think they are just not as good as GB talent wise or coaching wise... Neither is any other NFC team though... I knew that Chicago failing to eliminate GB on the last week would kick them in the sack, and it appears it will... As it will with all NFC playoff teams
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:04 PM | #569 |  
	| Everyone's Favorite Oilfan! 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: San Jose, California      | 
 
			
			Green Bay is playing lights out. If they play like this, Seattle/Chicago winner doesn't stand a chance in the NFC Championship. Aaron Rodgers has ice in his veins tonight.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:09 PM | #570 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 Location: @HOOT250      | 
 
			
			Well I'll be cheering for SEA now just to see a 7-9 team host the NFC Championship, even though they will never win.
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by henriksedin33  Not at all, as I've said, I would rather  start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams.  Bunch of  underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in  the playoffs. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:12 PM | #571 |  
	| That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Springfield Penitentiary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by HOOT  Well I'll be cheering for SEA now just to see a 7-9 team host the NFC Championship, even though they will never win. |  
To be fair if they win tomorrow they'll be 9-9 counting reg season and playoffs and hosting the NFC championship.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:15 PM | #572 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Red Deer, AB      | 
 
			
			Atlanta can't buy one right now
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:15 PM | #573 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by HOOT  Well I'll be cheering for SEA now just to see a 7-9 team host the NFC Championship, even though they will never win. |  
a question from someone who only tunes into the nfl in the playoffs, how does it work that a 7-9 team can host 2 playoff games (potentially for seattle) when they are the bottom seed? 
can someone explain this to me? 
thanks in advance
		 
				__________________GO FLAMES, STAMPEDERS, ROUGHNECKS, CALVARY, DAWGS and SURGE!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:17 PM | #574 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Victoria      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by calgaryrocks  a question from someone who only tunes into the nfl in the playoffs, how does it work that a 7-9 team can host 2 playoff games (potentially for seattle) when they are the bottom seed?can someone explain this to me?
 thanks in advance
 |  
They aren't the bottom seed.  Green Bay is.  If Green Bay wins and Seattle wins it would #6 Green Bay @ #4 Seattle.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:20 PM | #575 |  
	| That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Springfield Penitentiary      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by calgaryrocks  a question from someone who only tunes into the nfl in the playoffs, how does it work that a 7-9 team can host 2 playoff games (potentially for seattle) when they are the bottom seed?can someone explain this to me?
 thanks in advance
 |  
Much like the NHL the division winner gets an auto higher seed but is like baseball in that if you don't win your division the only way to get into the post season is to win one of the wildcard spots.
  
Seattle won their division so they hosted one of the wildcard teams (NO) who happened to have a better record. 
  
Sea could host the NFC Championship if GB wins (and of course if they win) because GB is a wildcard team and thus by default a lower seed. 
  
NFL playoffs allow 12 teams in the post season. Top 2 teams in each conference get a bye to the 2nd round.
  
In the 1st round the division winners (who aren't top 2 in the conference) host the wildcard winners.
  
Winners of those games are re-seeded and play the teams who had the bye. 
  
Winners of those games are re-seeded again and play for their Conference championship and a trip to the Superbowl.
		 
				 Last edited by Cecil Terwilliger; 01-15-2011 at 08:30 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:26 PM | #576 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Red Deer, AB      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by calgaryrocks  a question from someone who only tunes into the nfl in the playoffs, how does it work that a 7-9 team can host 2 playoff games (potentially for seattle) when they are the bottom seed?can someone explain this to me?
 thanks in advance
 |  
As per conference, there are 6 teams that make the playoffs. 
 
The top 2 teams in the division are awarded an automatic bye into the 2nd round. 
 
After that, there are divisional winners, and wildcard teams. If you win your division (chicago, seattle, atlanta, Philly) you are awarded a playoff spot, much like NHL. Afterwards, the top 2, non-division winning teams in each conference make up your wildcard teams.
 
So in this case, GB had a better record then Seattle, but failed to win the division which takes automatic priority in playoff placement.
 
Ps: 
CFL is weak compared to NFL football    
				 Last edited by DropIt; 01-15-2011 at 08:30 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:27 PM | #577 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 Location: @HOOT250      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger  To be fair if they win tomorrow they'll be 9-9 counting reg season and playoffs and hosting the NFC championship. |  
Sure. If you want to count playoffs but they made it into the playoffs as a 7-9 team.
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by henriksedin33  Not at all, as I've said, I would rather  start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams.  Bunch of  underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in  the playoffs. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:27 PM | #578 |  
	| Everyone's Favorite Oilfan! 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: San Jose, California      | 
 
			
			Holy crap look at Aaron Rodgers' numbers!!!
 42-14 Packers.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:31 PM | #579 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Ha ha Atlanta.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-15-2011, 08:37 PM | #580 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			What the frakking crap was that? CTV is just plain horrible.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM. | 
 
 
 |