08-17-2010, 09:09 PM
|
#161
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
|
Send 'em home! or more will just keep coming...
Feed them and send them back......
|
|
|
08-17-2010, 09:20 PM
|
#162
|
All I can get
|
I dunno. Lots of uninvited and shady Brits, Frenchmen and Spaniards who had no business being in the Americas started all this.
Our fine countries were built in large part with shady immigrants.
Last edited by Reggie Dunlop; 08-17-2010 at 09:31 PM.
|
|
|
08-17-2010, 10:18 PM
|
#163
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I personally don't really know how to feel about this whole situation. I have a co-worker who has spent the last 3 years and near $20K in legal and processing fees to become a permanent resident here. I know that refugee claims and immigration claims are different, but it doesn't seem right to watch someone arduously go through the process and then watch 490 people jump their queue.
But they are people, and as such we should at least provide a level of care for them, medicine, food, diesel etc. But I am very undecided about allowing them into the country. At the least, human smugglers the world over are watching this specific case with great interest.
I don't know if there is still a national guilty conscious about the Komagata Maru or the SS St. Louis that factors into this. But as a wealthy nation with liberal attitudes towards human rights, we need a strong stance towards refugee claims like this. I'm not opposed to using these 490 (excluding children) in infrastructure projects for their first year of processing. I'm also not opposed to giving them aid and sending them to their next destination. But I am opposed to opening the flood gates. Because if they are given clear cut refugee status then this is only the first of many ships aiming at our shores.
Last edited by simonsays; 08-18-2010 at 11:35 PM.
|
|
|
08-17-2010, 10:26 PM
|
#164
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop
I dunno. Lots of uninvited and shady Brits, Frenchmen and Spaniards who had no business being in the Americas started all this.
Our fine countries were built in large part with shady immigrants.
|
Yeah but its not 1500 anymore. Different times, you can't just stick a flag in the ground and claim the land.
Refugees are people fleeing their country to a neighboring country for fear of prosecution, not paying thousands of dollars to board a ship and jump the queue.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 04:17 AM
|
#165
|
All I can get
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradster57
Yeah but its not 1500 anymore.
|
I just checked my calendar and geez whilikers you're right.
Nothing has really changed. Remittance men. Cast-off street urchins. Religious whackos. That's just for starters.
The great unwashed and downtrodden of whatever nationality you care to name faced the same accusations.
I'm not even going to play the "I personally know recent immigrants from "X" country and they're fine citizens" card. Too easy. The accomplishments of immigrant Canadians historically tell me otherwise.
People clamoring and risking life and limb to become Canadian? DUH! That's what it's all about.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 04:54 AM
|
#166
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonsays
I don't know if there is still a national guilty conscious about the Komagata Maru or the SS St. Louis that factors into this. But as a wealthy nation with liberal attitudes towards human rights, we need a strong stance towards refugee claims like this. I'm not opposed to using these 490 (excluding children) in infrastructure projects for their first year of processing. I'm also not opposed to giving them aid and sending them to their next destination. But I am opposed to opening the flood gates. Because if they are given clear cut refugee status then this is only the first of many ships aiming at out shores.
|
This "if we allow one, we are going to be overrun" theory seems a little far fetched given that the Sikh ship that landed in Nova Scotia is the last time I remember so many people landing at once. And that was decades ago. If we allowed the Sikh's to be processed and stay as refugee's why haven't we been overrun with ships landing in the last 20 years or so?
This landing by boatloads is very rare given the cost and dangers involved. Most people would take refuge closer to home rather than risk the long trip.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 09:38 AM
|
#167
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
This "if we allow one, we are going to be overrun" theory seems a little far fetched given that the Sikh ship that landed in Nova Scotia is the last time I remember so many people landing at once. And that was decades ago. If we allowed the Sikh's to be processed and stay as refugee's why haven't we been overrun with ships landing in the last 20 years or so?
This landing by boatloads is very rare given the cost and dangers involved. Most people would take refuge closer to home rather than risk the long trip.
|
I think the problem is twofold
a) There are reports that there are 2 other boats, full, waiting to see the outcome of the Sun Sea before they depart themselves. Thats another potential 1000 immigrants heading for our shores in the near future.
b) They aren't actual "refugees". If the were seeking refuge from persecution, you think the closest and safest place to go is Canada? They stopped in Thailand IIRC where they would have been fine. But they obviously chose to try and come to Canada on purpose. Let them try their hand at regular immigration like the rest of the world.
Last edited by Ducay; 08-18-2010 at 09:40 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-18-2010, 09:49 AM
|
#168
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
This "if we allow one, we are going to be overrun" theory seems a little far fetched given that the Sikh ship that landed in Nova Scotia is the last time I remember so many people landing at once. And that was decades ago. If we allowed the Sikh's to be processed and stay as refugee's why haven't we been overrun with ships landing in the last 20 years or so?
This landing by boatloads is very rare given the cost and dangers involved. Most people would take refuge closer to home rather than risk the long trip.
|
Human smuggling is a whole new ball game now and it's a dangerous thing to condone considering the ties it often has to organized crime.
The people who own this ship got paid around $20 million from the 490 people on board. Of course, a lot of that money is probably "owed"... and how does one pay back a gangster?
If this ship and the people on it are allowed to stay, I would seriously consider getting some people together and purchasing a ship for bringing refugees to Canada (for a fee of course). What an easy way to make money to fund whatever I want.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 10:03 AM
|
#169
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
b) They aren't actual "refugees". If the were seeking refuge from persecution, you think the closest and safest place to go is Canada? They stopped in Thailand IIRC where they would have been fine. But they obviously chose to try and come to Canada on purpose. Let them try their hand at regular immigration like the rest of the world.
|
This is the key point. They are economic migrants, looking for a better life. That's fine, but that's what the immigration system is for - get in line.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VladtheImpaler For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-18-2010, 10:58 AM
|
#170
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Not only is it overly romantic, but at current population growth rates in the 3rd world, it probably isn't possible. There is some serious concern in the scientific community these days that our planet could reach it's carrying capacity by 2050. Right now, there might technically be enough resources to provide for the world if distribution and enegry costs weren't an issue, but probably not well into the future.
|
My point about 1st world nations giving up some nation autonomy for a serious effort at addressing these issues was based on the idea that some form of mass social concious be developed and a serious effort made at solving their problems. Not simply throwing them scraps while maintaining a gluttunous lifestyle en-masse that is based on ravaging these countries for resources, be it energy or manpower or whatever.
Bill Gates has the right idea.
__________________
So far, this is the oldest I've been.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 12:52 PM
|
#171
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate
This "if we allow one, we are going to be overrun" theory seems a little far fetched given that the Sikh ship that landed in Nova Scotia is the last time I remember so many people landing at once. And that was decades ago.
|
We got 50,000 boat people from Vietnam in 1980. None of them were invited.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 12:56 PM
|
#172
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinner
We got 50,000 boat people from Vietnam in 1980. None of them were invited.
|
And with them came the most delicious soups and subs in the world!
__________________
So far, this is the oldest I've been.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 12:59 PM
|
#173
|
#1 Goaltender
|
As long as the Canadian Government can separate the criminals from the legitimate refugees, Im fine with it.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:12 PM
|
#174
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck-Hater
As long as the Canadian Government can separate the criminals from the legitimate refugees, Im fine with it.
|
The Canadian government can do anything!
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:15 PM
|
#175
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
And with them came the most delicious soups and subs in the world!
|
And shady characters like Jackie Tran
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:17 PM
|
#176
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
And shady characters like Jackie Tran
|
Beef satay soup >>> Jackie Tran
P.S. If the Tamils have something to rival bun & pho, I am prepared to listen to their case...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VladtheImpaler For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:37 PM
|
#177
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Beef satay soup >>> Jackie Tran
P.S. If the Tamils have something to rival bun & pho, I am prepared to listen to their case...
|
Beef satay soup, extra spicy, extra vegetables. From Bolsa. SO GOOD!!!!
__________________
So far, this is the oldest I've been.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:39 PM
|
#178
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
Beef satay soup, extra spicy, extra vegetables. From Bolsa. SO GOOD!!!!
|
#1 with a bullet.... too soon?
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:41 PM
|
#179
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
And with them came the most delicious soups and subs in the world!
|
And the west coast heroin trade.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 01:42 PM
|
#180
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
#1 with a bullet.... too soon?
|
Nah. That was a while ago.
__________________
So far, this is the oldest I've been.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 AM.
|
|