11-01-2009, 07:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Strathmore
|
CFL Picks Week 19
3 huge games this weekend, all with playoff implications. Games this week start on Friday.
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask
Hamilton at Winnipeg
My picks: BC, Montreal, Calgary, Winnipeg
Last edited by Flickered Flame; 11-04-2009 at 07:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:14 PM
|
#2
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
BC
Montreal
Calgary
Hamilton
In a week of important games it should be an easy week to pick as there are a lot of mis-matches out there.
Edmonton is a very bad team and BC slightly better should win easily at home.
Montreal even though they don't care should beat TO.
Calgary is a lot better than Saskatchewan who likely is on slightly better than TO and if the Stamps want they should win in a walk.
Winnipeg is a god awful team. If not for TO and the Riders they may be one of the worst teams in league history. Hamilton wins by 25.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask
Hamilton at Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:24 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Hmmm
BC
Montreal
Calgary
Winnipeg
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:25 PM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Winnipeg is a god awful team. If not for TO and the Riders they may be one of the worst teams in league history. Hamilton wins by 25.
|
They've won 7 games and you haven't picked them to win any.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 08:31 PM
|
#6
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Watching 7ungo Giving Up Goals A 5 Year Old Could Stop!
|
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask Burris will be whipping that stupid little smile off his face when Chick destroys him.
Hamilton at Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 09:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse834
Calgary at Sask Burris will be whipping that stupid little smile off his face when Chick destroys him.
|
A product of the Saskatchewan education system, I see.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 09:37 PM
|
#8
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
A product of the Saskatchewan education system, I see.
|
Really? With all the junk moon has been posting and you have the audacity to rag on the Sask education system?
We may not know how to spell but at least we are smart enough to know what good teams are and what bad teams are.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 11:10 PM
|
#9
|
|
Basement Chicken Choker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
|
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask
Hamilton at Winnipeg
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2009, 11:11 PM
|
#10
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse834
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask Burris will be whipping that stupid little smile off his face when Chick destroys him.
Hamilton at Winnipeg
|
Someone's hopeful 
Maybe he has that "stupid little smile" because he's a defending Grey Cup champ 
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 10:07 AM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask
Hamilton at Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 12:20 PM
|
#12
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip
We may not know how to spell but at least we are smart enough to know what good teams are and what bad teams are.
|
Looking at the standings it doesn't appear that you know the difference between a good team or a bad team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machiavelli
They've won 7 games and you haven't picked them to win any.
|
They are a bad team that loses more than they win, why would I ever chose them to win a game?
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 12:22 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
They are a bad team that loses more than they win, why would I ever chose them to win a game?
|
Beauty logic. I hope for your sake that you don't bet on games.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 12:24 PM
|
#14
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machiavelli
Beauty logic. I hope for your sake that you don't bet on games.
|
The logic has me third overall in the standings.
I am not sure why betting against teams that you think are going to lose is a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 01:13 PM
|
#15
|
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Calgary
BC
Winnipeg
Montreal
Edmonton misses the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 02:44 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Edmonton at BC
Montreal at Toronto
Calgary at Sask
Hamilton at Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 04:01 PM
|
#17
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip
Really? With all the junk moon has been posting and you have the audacity to rag on the Sask education system?
|
Sure do. It's pretty obvious they can't teach basic geography or simple navigation either, since it seems like all of the melon heads who come here for the games can't seem to find their way back out of town.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 07:44 PM
|
#18
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Looking at the standings it doesn't appear that you know the difference between a good team or a bad team.
They are a bad team that loses more than they win, why would I ever chose them to win a game?
|
Wow moon you are so smart!!
Saskatchewan sure is as bad as TO. You know so much about football. I am so glad that you are smart enough to not let your hilariously stupid biases get in the way.
Worst team of the decade actually might be a better description for the Riders.
In fact, since they have beaten Calgary once and tied them another time I guess that would make the Riders the second worst team of the decade behind Calgary.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 08:01 PM
|
#19
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Edmonton at BC - edmonton is not good
Montreal at Toronto - Toronto has extremely poor execution
Calgary at Sask - this should be fun, Calgary has looked like the better team in both matchups so far, should even the series, even if its in riderville
Hamilton at Winnipeg- Hamilton is on fire right now, Winnipeg just got hosed. should be a close one
__________________
GO FLAMES, STAMPEDERS, ROUGHNECKS, CALVARY, DAWGS and SURGE!
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2009, 08:22 PM
|
#20
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip
Wow moon you are so smart!!
|
Thanks
Quote:
|
Saskatchewan sure is as bad as TO. You know so much about football. I am so glad that you are smart enough to not let your hilariously stupid biases get in the way.
|
The Riders aren't as bad as TO, they are slightly better.
Quote:
|
Worst team of the decade actually might be a better description for the Riders.
|
There were other Rider teams that were worse this decade.
Quote:
|
In fact, since they have beaten Calgary once and tied them another time I guess that would make the Riders the second worst team of the decade behind Calgary.
|
The Stamps certainly have had some embarrassing games this season. These two games and the Bombers lose are certainly at the top of the list.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 PM.
|
|
