Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-28-2009, 12:42 PM   #1
HotHotHeat
Franchise Player
 
HotHotHeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default Alberta closing hospital helipads...

Apparently they don't meet new transport Canada regulations.

Maybe not the hugest of deals, but this is a prime example of government officials being idiots. Chaps my ass. This service saves lives every day.

Helicopter landing pads are being closed at eight Alberta hospitals.
The closures begin Tuesday and will last two months. The medical choppers will have to land at municipal airports and transport patients by ground ambulance instead of landing directly at hospitals.
The affected hospitals are in Didsbury, Consort, Sundre, Barrhead, Castor, Wainwright, Westlock
and the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Edmonton.
Alberta Health Services says the helipads don't meet new regulations by Transport Canada .. But a Transport Canada official says none of its rules have changed.


Looks like Calgary's pads are staying open?
HotHotHeat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HotHotHeat For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2009, 12:59 PM   #2
Methanolic
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SW
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat View Post
Apparently they don't meet new transport Canada regulations.

Maybe not the hugest of deals, but this is a prime example of government officials being idiots. Chaps my ass. This service saves lives every day.

Helicopter landing pads are being closed at eight Alberta hospitals.
The closures begin Tuesday and will last two months. The medical choppers will have to land at municipal airports and transport patients by ground ambulance instead of landing directly at hospitals.
The affected hospitals are in Didsbury, Consort, Sundre, Barrhead, Castor, Wainwright, Westlock
and the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Edmonton.
Alberta Health Services says the helipads don't meet new regulations by Transport Canada .. But a Transport Canada official says none of its rules have changed.

Looks like Calgary's pads are staying open?




Agree!!!

Angered again by the Idiots in charge, but not at all surprised.
Methanolic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 03:16 PM   #3
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

This Stelmach guy has to go. Historically, I haven't paid much attention to Provincial politics, but I've had all I can take of this clown.

When's the next election anyway? Come to think of it, who else is there? I don't even know what the Provincial Libs are up to these days...
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2009, 03:20 PM   #4
CrusaderPi
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Self-Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure the Premier of Alberta has much to do with Transport Canada.
CrusaderPi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 03:31 PM   #5
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrusaderPi View Post
I'm not sure the Premier of Alberta has much to do with Transport Canada.
Quote:
Alberta Health Services says the helipads don't meet new regulations by Transport Canada .. But a Transport Canada official says none of its rules have changed.
This might be a bad sign, but I'd trust the word of a no-name departmental clerk from the Canadian Government over an official announcement from our current Alberta Government.

I don't know anything about the heli-pads, my comment was directed entirely at the bit I just quoted.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 03:34 PM   #6
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Stelmach is ######ed.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2009, 03:57 PM   #7
SteveToms
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...5.htm#foreword

If that is what they use, then the rules haven't changed in 2 years.
SteveToms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 04:03 PM   #8
CrusaderPi
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Self-Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
This might be a bad sign, but I'd trust the word of a no-name departmental clerk from the Canadian Government over an official announcement from our current Alberta Government.

I don't know anything about the heli-pads, my comment was directed entirely at the bit I just quoted.
duh @ me for a lack of reading comprehension.
CrusaderPi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 06:17 PM   #9
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

From the title, I thought they were all closing in Alberta - that would be devastating.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 06:25 PM   #10
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Another reason to vote WildRose next election.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2009, 07:58 PM   #11
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Why are there hospitals in...

Sundre - 2500 people

Didsbury - 4500 people

Consort - 500 people

Barhead - 4200 people

Castor - 930 people

Westlock - 5000 people.

All there should be in these dying centres of rural alberta is a helipad in these towns/villages to transport patients to hospitals in cities whose size warrants the expense.

The governemt should close the hospitals affected, put in a helipad be be done with them. The atrocious costs of health care are choking this province.

Until the Wildrose party gets rid of the nutbars - the can stay a forgotten memory. Alberta neither wants nor needs them. Procduce a party policy devoid of the crazys, and weed out those members running who will eventually tear this party down - and maybe I will consider voting for them.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%

Last edited by mykalberta; 06-28-2009 at 08:00 PM.
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mykalberta For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2009, 08:53 PM   #12
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Another reason to vote WildRose next election.
I don't think I'd go that far.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 09:22 PM   #13
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
All there should be in these dying centres of rural alberta is a helipad in these towns/villages to transport patients to hospitals in cities whose size warrants the expense.
That makes no sense to me. You are telling me it costs less to have each and every patient add some sort of ambulance bill to their heath care tab?

If the patient is seen in a small town or a major city; there will still be certain fixed costs; like salaries, medicines, consumables, etc. But if an ambulace bill within Calgary, I can't see a ground ambulance from Barrhead to Edmonton being less than $1000, and I'm not sure what STARS costs, but let's say it's $5000 per trip. (Making these numbers up, so bear with me.)

If that hospital treats 2 people per day that would need to be moved, and another 2 emergencies per week that require STARS, that is $100,000 per month in ambulance costs. I cannot see a small hospital costing that much to operate. Keep in mind we aren't talking Rockyview size of hospital; most small town hospitals are smaller than the doctors offices that you and I visit.

Never mind the PITA factor for anybody needing basic care like a broken arm. Also, where would the call be made from? Does the average patient get to decide if he needs an air ambulance? Or would you need some sort of triage centre.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 09:27 PM   #14
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
I don't think I'd go that far.
That far???

Which is it, we are too fiscally conservative for you or too socially moderate?
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 12:01 AM   #15
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
That far???

Which is it, we are too fiscally conservative for you or too socially moderate?
Whoo boy. I'm probably going to regret this in the morning... Maybe before I start, I should just point out that my intention isn't to piss anyone off... I'm just trying to make my point and maybe ask a few questions along the way. Anyhoo, here goes...


I'm just a two-party kinda guy.

I figure if some of the best people from the fringe parties were to join the two main parties, they might actually be able to get something done. The way it is now all they're really accomplishing is vote splitting... at best.

It's a shame, really.

Take the Green Party, for instance. Why doesn't some of these people just join the Libs or PCs so they can actually be elected and allowed to effect some real progress? Campaigning as a party that will never get elected sounds like they're just going through the motions and making a bit of noise along the way (once every election).

Maybe I'm just politically naive, but if I was someone who really wanted to change the way this province looks at the environment, I wouldn't look to join the Green Party and wind up tossed aside by the voters. I would join the Conservatives or Liberals (based on my other beliefs) and try to work within in order to effect real change.

As for the Wild Rose party (which someone else mentioned), it's even more baffling. I can understand the Green Party, since their focus is on something that no other party really stands for (as a primary platform at least)... but what's the deal with Wild Rose? They seem like they're just another version of spend/don't spend, abort/don't abort.

Why don't these guys just get in the game? This is a real question. I've put a lot of thought into this over the years (not specifically the Wild Rose, just fringe parties in general). The only answer I can come up with is they just want to do things their own way. The thing is, I'm going to vote for people who want to do things my way... and I think I'm a pretty typical voter.

As an aside, if you look at the Bloc at the federal level... Short of a coup, these guys are never going to form the Government. Why don't they dissolve and join with the Liberals or Conservatives? Heaven forbid French-Canadians actually get some real representation for once. Seriously. If I was from Quebec, I would be pissed that my "representation" came in the form of a hack, fringe-party that stands solely for dividing the country I live in. I'd be spending a lot of time wishing they'd just get their heads out of their asses and join a real party, and then make sure that that party pays attention to the issues that were important to me as a French-Canadian. I'm not even going to mention the NDP. Until they replace Layton, they might as well not even exist.

Again, I'm not exactly a politics major or something like that - but then again, maybe a little political naivety is what this country/province needs. Maybe the real problem is there are too many political majors and rocket surgeons treating this country like a giant chess board... when we're really just 30 million people trying to live our lives.

...annnnnnnd done.

Last edited by FanIn80; 06-29-2009 at 12:07 AM.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2009, 08:38 AM   #16
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

^Take the bag off your head.
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Traditional_Ale For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2009, 09:34 AM   #17
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
That makes no sense to me. You are telling me it costs less to have each and every patient add some sort of ambulance bill to their heath care tab?

If the patient is seen in a small town or a major city; there will still be certain fixed costs; like salaries, medicines, consumables, etc. But if an ambulace bill within Calgary, I can't see a ground ambulance from Barrhead to Edmonton being less than $1000, and I'm not sure what STARS costs, but let's say it's $5000 per trip. (Making these numbers up, so bear with me.)

If that hospital treats 2 people per day that would need to be moved, and another 2 emergencies per week that require STARS, that is $100,000 per month in ambulance costs. I cannot see a small hospital costing that much to operate. Keep in mind we aren't talking Rockyview size of hospital; most small town hospitals are smaller than the doctors offices that you and I visit.

Never mind the PITA factor for anybody needing basic care like a broken arm. Also, where would the call be made from? Does the average patient get to decide if he needs an air ambulance? Or would you need some sort of triage centre.
No town under 8000 people need a hospital. The most they need is a clinic with a handful of doctors and nurses to deal with the minor stuff. Anything else should be handled by air ambulance. You could essentially replace all these hospitals and probably more with 1 or 2 helicopters on a stand by basis. Which means you replace probably over 100 unionized employees with 4-8 private contractors that dont constantly bitch about salary and which dont go on strike every 4 years and hold this province hostage when they do it. In a perfect world those clinics would be privately operated and charge back there services to the province (to stay in line with the Canada Health Act) there my maximizing resources.

A full time nurses salary is 70k+/year include OT and you get over 100K with 200K+ for a doctor. The cost of a bed in this provice a few years ago was slated at 30k / month. Its probably upwards of 50k+. The salary costs dont include the pension that comes with those jobs.

There is no way that the capital outlay costs for 2 helipcopters + pilots is more than what it would cost to run those hospitalzs for 2-3 years max. If you want to reduce your upfront costs you lease the helicopters. You could further reduce it by bludozing these hospitals and selling the realestate back to the towns. Most of these hospitals are likely in choice locations now which could eventually be sold for a slight profit.

Living in rural alberta has its benefits and its downfalls. The benefits being you dont have to deal with noise/traffic - the downfalls being you shouldnt have a hospital. The taxation income from those citizens for sure dont cover the cost of operating these hospitals.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:00 AM   #18
underGRADFlame
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
 
underGRADFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post

Living in rural alberta has its benefits and its downfalls. The benefits being you dont have to deal with noise/traffic - the downfalls being you shouldnt have a hospital. The taxation income from those citizens for sure dont cover the cost of operating these hospitals.
Wow. I thank god you are not running our provincial heath care. I can not imagine the strain on the health care system if we only relied on major centers for urgent medical care.
Besides that, the number of people that would die everyday if it wasn't for these small hospitals would be staggering!
Your statement screams of someone that has only lived in a city and has never been to a small town. That you are some how better and get healthcare because you choose to live in a city, where as the farmer and his family who's wheat and cattle feed you, doesn't deserve the privilege of easy access to medical care so in his time of need when every second counts, he has to wait for a freaking helicopter!
underGRADFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to underGRADFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2009, 10:10 AM   #19
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
I don't think I'd go that far.
How come?

Right now, I consider it a BIG step up on the Liberals or Conservatives.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:14 AM   #20
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Pincher Creek has 3,500 people and a hospital.

We also have 12 doctors, and probably the most efficient health care in the province. The hospital is a big reason for that.

A couple years ago, all the doctors got together and built a good-sized clinic right next to the hospital. This lowered the strain on hospital staff, and allowed some of the specialists we have here(yes there are a couple)....to practice their trade properly.

I have no problem with a hospital in smaller towns. The problem is getting doctors to go there. Here, we live right beside the mountains, right beside Waterton, right beside Castle Mountain, not far from Fernie, a short drive from BC.....so its very appealing to young doctors looking to settle down somewhere.

Up north? Not so much.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy