12-26-2007, 11:26 PM
|
#41
|
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Unfortunately not, as it's a function of the user's control panel.
A couple of options though would be to block specific images when you see them (using firefox and adblock or something similar).
Another would be to use the archive view: http://forum.calgarypuck.com/archive/index.php/ (though that doesn't let you post).
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2007, 10:45 AM
|
#42
|
|
n00b!
|
That archive link is perfect for work Photon! Straight text without images! I'll definitely be using that here and there whenever I'm actually in the office. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2007, 02:39 PM
|
#43
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
|
I browze from work and life to see things like that- if I get in trouble then I don't have to sit through boredom everyday.
Is there a "please make me a sig" thread? If so, I would be willing to buy a fellow CPer a couple beers for an awesome signature... I just don't have the skillz to make one.
__________________
REDVAN!
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2007, 07:24 PM
|
#44
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
PS I Hate Hulse... Your sig is followed by two red x'd broken images... and its kinda large by default.  |
Huh? Not seeing any x's under Firefox. And at 74px high it's less than yours. Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 11:48 AM
|
#45
|
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
I also see two red X's.
And the adress for both pics shows up for me as being
http://www.junkspam.warpmail.net/IHH5sig.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 04:42 PM
|
#46
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
|
While I see it fine, and it is at:
http://www.junkspam.warpmail.net/IHH6.jpg
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 05:06 PM
|
#47
|
|
CP's Resident DJ
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the Gin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
|
Ken is correct. You are using Firefox too perhaps?
Anyhoo, yes, his sig has been like that for many months. Ken, I bet you could edit out the problem in his profile.
Oh, and IHH, I believe what ATR was indicating is that your sig is too wide (425)
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 06:31 PM
|
#48
|
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
|
Yep, I see that one, then immediately below it I see two red X's.
IHH- did you just intend on having that one image in your sig? If so, it's possible you have some remnants of an old sig in there, and people using Firefox maybe don't see X's- they just see blank.
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 06:56 PM
|
#49
|
|
The lesser known Sedin brother
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Apparently Sweden...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
You know what they say about big signatures.
|
no, what?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2007, 10:06 PM
|
#50
|
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse
Huh? Not seeing any x's under Firefox. And at 74px high it's less than yours. Am I missing something?
|
Haha, mine's only 81px high... well under the limit. I was only trying to tell you I see red x's and I dont know what they should be, but it's kind of pointless space being used by broken linked images.
Last edited by alltherage; 12-30-2007 at 10:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
12-31-2007, 12:48 AM
|
#51
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Weeee-ird. The signature edit box showed nothing but the sigfile, but Firefox wasn't rendering the red x boxes for me, so I didn't know anything was amiss or to clean em out. One image file is all there was supposed to be. Redid it all and it's OK in IE7. Strange thing is that I've had this sig for ages.
Sorry folks, that would have driven me nuts as vertical sig height is what kills readability of the forums. Horizontal not so much, IMHO.
Last edited by I-Hate-Hulse; 12-31-2007 at 01:04 AM.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 PM.
|
|
