Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2024, 01:53 PM   #18781
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
They traded their leading goal and point producer before the season even began.

If their desire was truly to wiggle into the playoffs at all costs they don't make that move.

Conroy said he wouldn't walk players to free agency. He hasn't.
Conroy said he wants a younger lineup. He has one.
Yeah, you can argue the Toffoli trade was an attempt to stay competitive but there is zero argument that can be made about the Zadorov trade.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 01:54 PM   #18782
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Yup - if you can get a potential blue chip piece in addition to a 1st you're laughing.

If you could get Kakko or Byram in a Lindholm package, and Lundell in a Hanifin package and get picks on top of that then I think you'd be in good shape for a "retool"

Somebody mentioned it above...trade for Kakko and Lundell, sign Puljujarvi and create a young Finnish line.
Why do people like Lundell that much? Do you think he will figure things out defensively? He's the last guy I'd like the Flames to take a gamble on.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 01:55 PM   #18783
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
the rumored trades are ridiculous wins for the Flames...especially vs. signing Lindholm to 8x9
I definitely think Lindholm and his agent can throw the idea of that contract into the trash heap. He is looking at the Kadri deal at best.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 02:05 PM   #18784
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Yup - if you can get a potential blue chip piece in addition to a 1st you're laughing.

If you could get Kakko or Byram in a Lindholm package, and Lundell in a Hanifin package and get picks on top of that then I think you'd be in good shape for a "retool"

Somebody mentioned it above...trade for Kakko and Lundell, sign Puljujarvi and create a young Finnish line.
Byram is a piece we desperately need and he will be stuck behind Makar and Toews if he remains in Colorado.

If he can stay healthy he has quite the ceiling. Would instantly become our best PP quarterback.

Just can we convince Colorado to do it?
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:09 PM   #18785
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
Byram is a piece we desperately need and he will be stuck behind Makar and Toews if he remains in Colorado.

If he can stay healthy he has quite the ceiling. Would instantly become our best PP quarterback.

Just can we convince Colorado to do it?
That's a big if on the health question. As I said before I would rather acquire Ritchie than Byram, maybe not the upside at his position but he isn't made of glass either.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 02:12 PM   #18786
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
That's a big if on the health question. As I said before I would rather acquire Ritchie than Byram, maybe not the upside at his position but he isn't made of glass either.
Let's go get both.

Byram
Ritchie
1st

for

Lindholm
Tanev
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 02:13 PM   #18787
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I definitely think Lindholm and his agent can throw the idea of that contract into the trash heap. He is looking at the Kadri deal at best.
Works out way better for the Flames, but Lindholm probably lost himself over 15 million dollars on the overall value of his next contract.
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:13 PM   #18788
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I definitely think Lindholm and his agent can throw the idea of that contract into the trash heap. He is looking at the Kadri deal at best.
I think he will beat the Kadri deal, especially if he is willing to go anywhere. Obviously 9M and 8 years is laughable at this point.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:23 PM   #18789
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
Why do people like Lundell that much? Do you think he will figure things out defensively? He's the last guy I'd like the Flames to take a gamble on.
He's not bad defensively at all...it's more if he ever shows the offensive potential he showed as a rookie with 40 points again.

If he figures it out though he's like a tailor made replacement for Lindholm and would be very similar to like acquiring Lindholm when the Flames did from Carolina.

Lundell and Byram both still have the potential to be top line or top pairing types of talent, and are the types of talent you want to buy low on and bet on in trades like these.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-31-2024 at 02:35 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:24 PM   #18790
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
That's a big if on the health question. As I said before I would rather acquire Ritchie than Byram, maybe not the upside at his position but he isn't made of glass either.
I'm a big fan of Byram so I might not be the most objective on it.

I think he has the talent you gamble on.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:43 PM   #18791
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

How about these potential trades:

To Colorado: Lindholm (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + Calum Ritchie + Johansen (cap dump)

To Dallas: Hanifin (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + 2nd round pick + Lian Bischel

To New Jersey: Markstrom
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick (top 10 protected) + 2024 3rd round pick + Vanacek

To Vancouver: Tanev (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 02:44 PM   #18792
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
How about these potential trades:

To Colorado: Lindholm (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + Calum Ritchie + Johansen (cap dump)

To Dallas: Hanifin (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + 2nd round pick + Lian Bischel

To New Jersey: Markstrom
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick (top 10 protected) + 2024 3rd round pick + Vanacek

To Vancouver: Tanev (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick
I don’t really like the Markstrom deal but all others are good for Calgary in my opinion.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:48 PM   #18793
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t really like the Markstrom deal but all others are good for Calgary in my opinion.
I look at the quality of the pick from New Jersey as higher than any pick in any of the other trades. If they pick where they are set to pick right now, it’s a 12th overall pick. That’s a very good pick to get for any goalie in any circumstance. Can’t remember the last time a goalie went for something like that.

Last edited by stemit14; 01-31-2024 at 03:00 PM.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 02:54 PM   #18794
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
I look at the quality of the pick from New Jersey as higher than any pick in any of the other trades. If they pick where they are set to pick right now, it’s a 12th overall pick. That’s a very good pick to get for any goalie in any circumstance. Can’t remember the last one a goalie went for something like that.
Adding a top goalie should get NJ out of that spot. I shook my head when fans were saying we should dump Markstrom on the Oilers so we get a top 5 pick and all it took was some better goaltending and team play and Edmonton’s pick looks destined for the 20’s.

I might regret saying this due to the volatility of the position but I think Markstrom is worth keeping around to mentor Wolf and if the team wants to get back to contention soon having a top tandem makes sense.


If they are chasing high picks the next couple years (very acceptable approach) then I would think moving Markstrom should be a priority.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 03:13 PM   #18795
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Adding a top goalie should get NJ out of that spot.
Two of their top three defencemen are injured (probably for the season), and their #1C is injured again too. This season is a write-off for NJ.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 03:27 PM   #18796
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
They traded their leading goal and point producer before the season even began.

If their desire was truly to wiggle into the playoffs at all costs they don't make that move.

Conroy said he wouldn't walk players to free agency. He hasn't.
Conroy said he wants a younger lineup. He has one.
I don't think it's to wiggle into playoffs at all costs.

I think its a combo of:
1. Not lose assets for free
1.1 sign them if possible
1.2 trade then if not
2. Stay in the mix
3. Get younger

I have derived these from interviews from management and insiders like friedman, Maloney, bean, Conroy and francis.
Maybe I'm wrong on this please let me know.

I get worried that they will put too much emphasis on 1.1 and 2, because it comes up alot in the interviews and historically that is what they've done.

Last edited by traptor; 01-31-2024 at 03:30 PM.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 03:33 PM   #18797
CroCop
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
I'm a big fan of Byram so I might not be the most objective on it.

I think he has the talent you gamble on.
Absolutely. This kid has the motor to play 25 mins a night as up and down the ice dman. Would probably instantly become our best player. Overshadowed but was instrumental in Colorados Championship. Still can’t believe he’d be available though.

I know he hates the Oilers too. Big plus lol.
CroCop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroCop For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2024, 03:37 PM   #18798
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Two of their top three defencemen are injured (probably for the season), and their #1C is injured again too. This season is a write-off for NJ.
I do not see them moving their 1st at all for a 34 year old goalie who has been fairly hot and cold over the past several seasons if that is the case
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 03:43 PM   #18799
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
How about these potential trades:

To Colorado: Lindholm (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + Calum Ritchie + Johansen (cap dump)

To Dallas: Hanifin (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + 2nd round pick + Lian Bischel

To New Jersey: Markstrom
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick (top 10 protected) + 2024 3rd round pick + Vanacek

To Vancouver: Tanev (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick
I would be good with the Lindholm and Tanev deals. Take out the 2nd round pick and Bischel and change them to Bourque for the Dallas deal. The Markstrom deal is not even close, there needs to another very significant asset coming back like a Holtz and change the 3rd to a 2nd.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2024, 03:45 PM   #18800
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
How about these potential trades:

To Colorado: Lindholm (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + Calum Ritchie + Johansen (cap dump)

To Dallas: Hanifin (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick + 2nd round pick + Lian Bischel

To New Jersey: Markstrom
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick (top 10 protected) + 2024 3rd round pick + Vanacek

To Vancouver: Tanev (50% retained)
To Calgary: 2024 1st round pick
Would be huge wins across the board!
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy