Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Pick your top five selection list
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 44 8.21%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 118 22.01%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 56 10.45%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Bennett 4 0.75%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 21 3.92%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 10 1.87%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 22 4.10%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Reinhart 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 27 5.04%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 9 1.68%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 85 15.86%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 41 7.65%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl-Bennett 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Bennett-Draisaitl 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Ekblad-Bennett 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 19 3.54%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 8 1.49%
Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 9 1.68%
Bennett-Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 12 2.24%
Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 5 0.93%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 6 1.12%
Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 4 0.75%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Reinhart-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Reinhart 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle 3 0.56%
Voters: 536. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-13-2014, 10:59 AM   #3701
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

It's going to happen Burke was the Leafs representative in 2012



pretty sure part of the agreement for doing a lottery show is that the top 5 teams with a chance at the #1 overall have a representative on the show


Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFlamesGo1989 View Post
Probably Conroy he brought us luck in Philly with Gaudreau and Arnold. Why not bring us luck at the lottery in Toronto.
hopefully they send a private jet with Conroy to impress everyone and he can bring the 1st overall pick back straight to calgary
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 11:57 AM   #3702
Mith
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Mith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Guelph, ON
Exp:
Default

Is there any reason that the Oilers should retain their pick and select a forward? I know they WILL because they have no clue what they're doing, but the smart thing to do would be to dump the 3rd overall for help on the back end...right?

Either that or somehow move up a spot to get Ekblad. If Ekblad is gone I don't understand why they'd keep the pick.
Mith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 12:03 PM   #3703
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Anyone think Tyler Myers for the Oilers pick at 3? Buffalo takes Ekblad 1, then trade one of their other defence man to get a forward at 3?

Highly unlikely but you never know
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 12:09 PM   #3704
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Tyler Myers for the Oilers pick would be a terrible trade that not even the Oilers would do.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 12:46 PM   #3705
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mith View Post
Is there any reason that the Oilers should retain their pick and select a forward? I know they WILL because they have no clue what they're doing, but the smart thing to do would be to dump the 3rd overall for help on the back end...right?

Either that or somehow move up a spot to get Ekblad. If Ekblad is gone I don't understand why they'd keep the pick.
I think Craig Buttons theory about trading the pick to the Islandes for Griffen Rienhart holds some water.

Islanders give their pick to Buffalo and still get a third overall this year.

Oilers get much needed help on the blue line with1 year development.

That is all contingent on Oil not getting a Ekblad which I could see them selling the farm to move up to get as well.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:20 PM   #3706
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
If we get the 4th pick and it is between Draisaitl and Dal Colle who do we take?
In that scenario? I'd rather trade the pick to Van for Edler.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:24 PM   #3707
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
I think Craig Buttons theory about trading the pick to the Islandes for Griffen Rienhart holds some water.

Islanders give their pick to Buffalo and still get a third overall this year.

Oilers get much needed help on the blue line with1 year development.

That is all contingent on Oil not getting a Ekblad which I could see them selling the farm to move up to get as well.
The Isles will not and should not give the pick away.

If they deal the pick for Reinhart they should use both picks to get two top players.

Giving Buffalo the pick this year would be one of the dumbest moves in the past 20 years.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:25 PM   #3708
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Anyone think Tyler Myers for the Oilers pick at 3? Buffalo takes Ekblad 1, then trade one of their other defence man to get a forward at 3?

Highly unlikely but you never know
No way is Myers alone worth the 3rd pick in this draft.

Debatable whether he would even be worth a 1st at all.

If I am the Oilers and want Myers I offer my 2nd pick this year and/or a prospect.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:28 PM   #3709
TheMagicMan
Backup Goalie
 
TheMagicMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

So why would Burke want to advertise that he doesn't want Draisaitl? It doesn't make sense...only reason why he would say this is putting up a smoke screen and implement some reverse psychology. By saying that you do not want a player will give other teams an advantage of what the Flames drafting list maybe like. Perhaps he does want Leon?

Also, maybe the Flames also want Ehlers? Sure they want truculence, but the ceiling of this prospect is extremely high. If the other teams above the Flames are considering Ehlers, Flames should also do their due diligence and look into the possibility of drafting him as well.

Just keeping an open mind....
TheMagicMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:40 PM   #3710
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
The Isles will not and should not give the pick away.

If they deal the pick for Reinhart they should use both picks to get two top players.

Giving Buffalo the pick this year would be one of the dumbest moves in the past 20 years.


Where would giving away the McDavid pick next year rank?
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:41 PM   #3711
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

Burke said at the Luncheon on Tuesday that he would be in T.O for the lottery.
Incogneto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:43 PM   #3712
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
[/B]

Where would giving away the McDavid pick next year rank?
The Islanders would have to do so much to sabotage their team next year that they should have no concern about being close to McDavid range next year.

A full season of Tavares and Okposo, goaltending that isn't horrfic, Hamonic/De Haan/Hickey a year older plus moves made knowing you have no first should and other teams actively trying for the first should easily keep them out of McDavid ranking.

The chances of them getting McDavid next year if they keep the pick are so slim that it isn't worth giving up Dal Colle/Draisatl then getting the 16th pick next year.

The Isles pick will not be the McDavid pick unless they by some insane fluke win the draft lottery.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-13-2014, 01:46 PM   #3713
red sky
#1 Goaltender
 
red sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
I think Craig Buttons theory about trading the pick to the Islandes for Griffen Rienhart holds some water.

Islanders give their pick to Buffalo and still get a third overall this year.

Oilers get much needed help on the blue line with1 year development.

That is all contingent on Oil not getting a Ekblad which I could see them selling the farm to move up to get as well.
Edmonton doesn't own a farm, they own a petting zoo of the heavy variety.
red sky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to red sky For This Useful Post:
Old 04-13-2014, 01:48 PM   #3714
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

I'm with moon on this one. Sends a pretty ####ty message to your fans if you hold onto next year's pick instead. You'd be telling them to expect some major league suckage coming up.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
Old 04-13-2014, 01:51 PM   #3715
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
The Islanders would have to do so much to sabotage their team next year that they should have no concern about being close to McDavid range next year.

A full season of Tavares and Okposo, goaltending that isn't horrfic, Hamonic/De Haan/Hickey a year older plus moves made knowing you have no first should and other teams actively trying for the first should easily keep them out of McDavid ranking.

The chances of them getting McDavid next year if they keep the pick are so slim that it isn't worth giving up Dal Colle/Draisatl then getting the 16th pick next year.

The Isles pick will not be the McDavid pick unless they by some insane fluke win the draft lottery.
Fair enough, but it looks a much better draft next year.

You have more faith in them than their track record suggests.

Buffalo with three firsts overall next year(including their own) is pretty scary
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:53 PM   #3716
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sun View Post
I'm with moon on this one. Sends a pretty ####ty message to your fans if you hold onto next year's pick instead. You'd be telling them to expect some major league suckage coming up.
Plus with Wang trying to sell the team, doubtful he or Snow will be around to see their carnage they've created for the organization.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:55 PM   #3717
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't think the Isles will be close to a top pick next season. They'll keep this years. And try like the dickens to stock up for a playoff push in the offseason.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:56 PM   #3718
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So who do the Flames send to be their representative on TSN's draft lottery show?

Last year the top 5 teams that had a chance at winning the lottery all had somebody there.
its not just the top 5 teams now

whomever wins the lottery gets 1st overall
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:59 PM   #3719
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
its not just the top 5 teams now

whomever wins the lottery gets 1st overall
Yes... But last year only the top 5 teams had representatives at the TSN lottery show like sureLoss said.

The Flames picked 6th and didn't have a rep.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 02:03 PM   #3720
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Fair enough, but it looks a much better draft next year.

You have more faith in them than their track record suggests.

Buffalo with three firsts overall next year(including their own) is pretty scary
I think it is a large part about the message it sends as well.

If it were the Flames for example you could sell to the fans that next year is going to be a tough year anyways so maybe it makes sense for them to tank for next year.

But with the Isles they have been so awful for so long and now are starting to show some positive signs (pre-Tavares injury) that to tell them you are now going to actively go against that and tank would be a tough sell, especially since the likelihood of getting that top pick would be so low.

I think the Isles are much better off adding a Dal Colle this year and going forward with Tavares, Strome, Okposo, Dal Colle upfront and starting to add pieces this offseason rather than basically taking this off-season off and banking on getting that top pick (or top 3pick if you like Eichel and Hanafin as well) next. We have seen this year even with a bad team how hard it can be to get a top 3 pick and the Isles will have a superstar that can win games every night out to make the difference between 60 and 68 points.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy