Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2015, 10:12 AM   #41
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
His playing style reminds me a bit of Iginla.
No one's play in the NHL at this moment reminds me of Iginla (of old).
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 10:14 AM   #42
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Trade some assets while their value is still high? If the season continues like this we're not going to get anything of value for pretty much anyone on the team not named Bennett, Monahan or Gaudreau.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 10:34 AM   #43
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Was just going to ask. I mean, I've heard Rychel rumours since late spring.

Why has the team been shopping him in particular so hard?

His numbers are progressing very well since he was drafted. What does Columbus see or not see?
They're trying to fill a need (defence) from a position of strength (young forwards with size). They're not looking for a 5-6 d-man, they're looking for a young 3-4. And they're realistic enough to know that they'll have to give up a quality asset to get one back.

I don't see a fit with the Flames. Russell isn't a long-term solution for the Jackets. Hickey is probably closest to what they're looking for, but they can't wait a season or two.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:15 AM   #44
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

I think Russell is overrated. So I would definately do a Russell+ to get Rychel.

He blocks a lot of shots because he's in the defensive zone too much.

Shots blocked is starting to become like PIMs.
People see a high number and think its a good thing.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:22 AM   #45
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
They're trying to fill a need (defence) from a position of strength (young forwards with size). They're not looking for a 5-6 d-man, they're looking for a young 3-4. And they're realistic enough to know that they'll have to give up a quality asset to get one back.

I don't see a fit with the Flames. Russell isn't a long-term solution for the Jackets. Hickey is probably closest to what they're looking for, but they can't wait a season or two.
If there is going to be a fit it will have to be an expanded deal to balance out the parts. Without going NHL 2015 on everyone, something along the lines of Wideman/Jankowski for Atkinson/Rychel. Columbus gets a top six d for now and a prospect to offset the loss of Rychel. We get a rh shot to play in our top 9 for two seasons after this one and get the upgrade on the prospect. Not sure if this would get it done but if a deal is going to get done it has to involve a few more parts.

Columbus is desperate and they stockpiled picks a few years back so that they could have assets to improve the team at a later date. They need to show the fans last year was not an abberation and they will continue to contend.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:23 AM   #46
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

If the Flames do in fact acquire Rychel then we would have 4 first round picks from the 2013 draft. Also, I think Rychel and Sieloff are bffs - I vaguely remember Sieloff came with Rychel to the 2013 draft.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:26 AM   #47
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
I think Russell is overrated. So I would definately do a Russell+ to get Rychel.

He blocks a lot of shots because he's in the defensive zone too much.

Shots blocked is starting to become like PIMs.
People see a high number and think its a good thing.
What???

It IS a good thing. Those are shots that do not end up on goal. They're nothing like PIM. There are zero positives from PIM. There are zero negatives from blocked shots.

I agree that Russell has become a bit over rated as when he's not blocking shots he seems like he's too small to control the defensive zone, but his shot blocking is still a positive quality.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:32 AM   #48
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
I agree. I think that's a fair price from the Flames side. At this point, Wotherspoon looks 50/50 to be a top 4 d man. He has just as likely a chance to be a bottom 6 d man.
What's the difference between a top 6 d-man and a bottom 6 d-man when usually only 6 d-men are playing at any given time?
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:39 AM   #49
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

I don't understand how Rychel helps the Flames this season? It may be great for Stockton, but to trade for him and throw him on the Flames goes against the "never given always earned" mantra.

Add to that, giving up one of our top 4 D+?

If that's the case, start dealing vets for picks and prospects and aim for Matthews now. Get the kids up and rotate them for some NHL experience and start prepping for next season.

We need young bodies with some NHL experience or at least proven they are ready.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:41 AM   #50
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
What???

It IS a good thing. Those are shots that do not end up on goal. They're nothing like PIM. There are zero positives from PIM. There are zero negatives from blocked shots.

I agree that Russell has become a bit over rated as when he's not blocking shots he seems like he's too small to control the defensive zone, but his shot blocking is still a positive quality.
Kent Wilson does a good job summarizing blocked shots.

@Kent_Wilson
Blocking shots is like killing rats. Doing it is preferable to not, but if you’re doing it all the time it suggests you have bigger problems
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 11:43 AM   #51
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
What???

It IS a good thing. Those are shots that do not end up on goal. They're nothing like PIM. There are zero positives from PIM. There are zero negatives from blocked shots.

I agree that Russell has become a bit over rated as when he's not blocking shots he seems like he's too small to control the defensive zone, but his shot blocking is still a positive quality.
I'd rather the puck be in the offensive zone.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:44 AM   #52
adc
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Exp:
Default

Hopefully the Flames are looking at moves that make them better able to compete for the Stanley Cup not only if it makes them better his year or not.

Isn't it possible he earned it with his good play in other places or is the only way to "earn" your way onto the Flames is to toil away in the the AHL first? (Ignoring the fact I missed anyone saying that he should go right to the Flames)

With the lack of size amongst the forwards and guys like Ferland and Jooris struggling ofensively and Bouma and Colborne with injury concerns Rychel gives the Flames an option to bring in some size/grit and offensive ability.
adc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:46 AM   #53
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

The slow start has been a bit of a wake up call for me. I don't think the Flames are serious contenders for another two years once some of the bad contracts come off and they can add another big contract for a top player. So trading for a top prospect right now makes sense to me. Russel and Wotherspoon would be a steal IMO.

In the interim, no more long term contracts please unless it is for one of our young stars.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 11:48 AM   #54
drewtastic
First Line Centre
 
drewtastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Kent Wilson does a good job summarizing blocked shots.

@Kent_Wilson
Blocking shots is like killing rats. Doing it is preferable to not, but if you’re doing it all the time it suggests you have bigger problems
My argument would be that the "bigger problems" with Russell is the fact that his partner often gets himself caught up-ice, forcing Russell to stay at home more. If anything, Russell should be the more offensive of any D-pairing, but he's had to fill the defensive role more because Wideman is naturally offensive-minded.

While everyone on the team's had struggles to some extent so far this season, I still think Russell's more valuable to this team than Wideman.
drewtastic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to drewtastic For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 11:59 AM   #55
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

With another LW, how would Rychel fit? Bollig expires, Rychel 2/3rd line with Ferland and Bouma on 4th line? Based on the clips I have seen, Rychel doesn't throw the body like Ferland does, but the passing and shots is easily better.

I don't know why, but I'm suddenly reminded of Bertuzzi.
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 12:10 PM   #56
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

If we are making a trade for Rychel, I sure hope this involves some of next years salary going the other way. Russell, a UFA, is a piece we can deal with when it comes (let go for nothing, or sign for what's left). What we need is relief of what we have.

Wideman, Smid, and Engelland are a part of any deal I'd hope.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 12:20 PM   #57
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
I don't understand how Rychel helps the Flames this season? It may be great for Stockton, but to trade for him and throw him on the Flames goes against the "never given always earned" mantra.

Add to that, giving up one of our top 4 D+?

If that's the case, start dealing vets for picks and prospects and aim for Matthews now. Get the kids up and rotate them for some NHL experience and start prepping for next season.

We need young bodies with some NHL experience or at least proven they are ready.
The Flames are still rebuilding. That means they should still be looking at deals through the lens of how it improves the team in the long-term, not this season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98 View Post
If we are making a trade for Rychel, I sure hope this involves some of next years salary going the other way. Russell, a UFA, is a piece we can deal with when it comes (let go for nothing, or sign for what's left). What we need is relief of what we have.

Wideman, Smid, and Engelland are a part of any deal I'd hope.
The problem is the Jackets are tight up against the cap. If Russell or Wideman are going to Columbus, contract will be coming back. Another reason why it would be a tricky deal to make.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 12:24 PM   #58
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The problem is the Jackets are tight up against the cap. If Russell or Wideman are going to Columbus, contract will be coming back. Another reason why it would be a tricky deal to make.
This is true, totally forgot that team was against it. Oy...

They DO (apparently) have $3,456,906 free... so they could at least take most of Wideman and send us back $2.5-3M
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 12:36 PM   #59
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
What's the difference between a top 6 d-man and a bottom 6 d-man when usually only 6 d-men are playing at any given time?
Sorry, I meant bottom pairing dman vs. 2nd pairing.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2015, 12:37 PM   #60
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

nm

Last edited by sureLoss; 10-23-2015 at 12:40 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy