Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2009, 09:07 PM   #241
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
But if you can't understand why someone may choose to do this with someone else, then, meh, I guess. It'll all go over your head anyways.
I understand it perfectly, which is why I think it's dumb. See, if you argue something from fallacious premises, it doesn't matter if someone else makes the same argument and thus agrees with you. You're both... still.... wrong.

In this case, one of the the underlying premises is that sex is something that gets better when you don't do it for 3 months, when in truth, it gets better with practice, just like everything else. Do you end up being a better hockey player by not playing hockey for 3 months? Are you smarter by not studying for 3 months? A better chef by not cooking for 3 months? By this "theory", your peak sexual performance is at virginity's loss, and it's all downhill from there.

The other premise is that abstaining from sex proves your commitment to your partner. No, not having sex with *other people* proves your commitment - not having sex with your partner just adds them to that list of people with whom you are not having sex. Abstention proves something about your willpower, but it has NOTHING to do with commitment. There's women I've slept with but feel no commitment towards, and there are women I've not slept with but would never betray. The concepts have nothing to do with one another.

Now back to the much more entertaining thread derailment.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jammies For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2009, 09:27 PM   #242
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies View Post
In this case, one of the the underlying premises is that sex is something that gets better when you don't do it for 3 months, when in truth, it gets better with practice, just like everything else. Do you end up being a better hockey player by not playing hockey for 3 months? Are you smarter by not studying for 3 months? A better chef by not cooking for 3 months? By this "theory", your peak sexual performance is at virginity's loss, and it's all downhill from there.
If you get better the more you do it, why do some couples who have been together for a long period of time say their sex life is stagnant?

Also, I'm not sure they're saying the sex will get better at all. Rather, it'll mean more and be more special. In addition, they're not doing it to improve their sex life, rather their connection.

Quote:
The other premise is that abstaining from sex proves your commitment to your partner. No, not having sex with *other people* proves your commitment - not having sex with your partner just adds them to that list of people with whom you are not having sex. Abstention proves something about your willpower, but it has NOTHING to do with commitment. There's women I've slept with but feel no commitment towards, and there are women I've not slept with but would never betray. The concepts have nothing to do with one another.

Now back to the much more entertaining thread derailment.
Again, I don't think it's about proving commitment, rather deepening the bond. Which CAN happen in a non-sexual way.

I love playing devil's advocate. (Or in this case would I be playing the opposite role as it seems the devil's advocate would be for sex, no?)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:30 PM   #243
BuzzardsWife
Powerplay Quarterback
 
BuzzardsWife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: beautiful calgary alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck View Post
Yeah, and finding a girl who is bi-curious can be difficult. Maybe not so in Calgary I guess.
It has to be a stranger, and it has to be all about the girls at first. Don't look at it from a selfish perspective, it will turn your woman off.

It has to be about your mutual pleasure. I don't know about the "not as hot" factor, because most women find other attractive women to be beautiful.........go to a club where bi-chicks hang out and get her to pick one out.
Then you make the approach...build some good rappor....carry a "me and my gf are out looking for some fun tonight".........vibe and say "hey, we are going to get a cab, would you like to come along with us"........kind of thing.
Then, you start getting physical with an innocent massage.......
You're kinda livin in Penthouse Forum dreamland don't yu think?
__________________
I'm comin to town, and hell's comin with me
BuzzardsWife is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:37 PM   #244
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
If you get better the more you do it, why do some couples who have been together for a long period of time say their sex life is stagnant?
I'm no Dr. Phil, but I doubt it's because they failed to practice long periods of abstinence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
Also, I'm not sure they're saying the sex will get better at all. Rather, it'll mean more and be more special. In addition, they're not doing it to improve their sex life, rather their connection.
I think this is the major point of contention for the side that's arguing that it's ridiculous. I still submit 'to each his own', but my personal view on this is much more in the neighbourhood of 'live each day to the fullest'. Not having sex when you could be having sex goes against the grain...for me, anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
Again, I don't think it's about proving commitment, rather deepening the bond. Which CAN happen in a non-sexual way.
Chicks are weird.
4X4 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 4X4 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2009, 09:41 PM   #245
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
I'm no Dr. Phil, but I doubt it's because they failed to practice long periods of abstinence.
But it's probably not because they didn't practice enough either...


Quote:
I think this is the major point of contention for the side that's arguing that it's ridiculous. I still submit 'to each his own', but my personal view on this is much more in the neighbourhood of 'live each day to the fullest'. Not having sex when you could be having sex goes against the grain...for me, anyway.
Is sex better with a random or someone you love? That's what it boils down to. And the more you love that person, the better the sex is too...

Quote:
Chicks are weird.
Damn straight. Guys are weird too.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:52 PM   #246
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Your second response has nothing to do with the quote above it.
4X4 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:53 PM   #247
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
If you get better the more you do it, why do some couples who have been together for a long period of time say their sex life is stagnant?
Variety is the spice of life. If your doing it the same way all the time it's no wonder sex gets stagnant.
__________________
Dion is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:59 PM   #248
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
If you get better the more you do it, why do some couples who have been together for a long period of time say their sex life is stagnant?
If you can figure that out and a way to fix it, write a book and be a billionaire. Mostly it's a lack of variety - there's certainly plenty of arguments for monogamy, but biological imperatives encourage both men and women to stray and no amount of inventiveness with the same partner satisfies that urge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
Again, I don't think it's about proving commitment, rather deepening the bond. Which CAN happen in a non-sexual way.
I don't see how not having sex and doing (whatever else you do) can create a deeper bond than having sex and doing (whatever else you do). I'm definitely not arguing that you can't improve a relationship without necessarily involving sex, but it's not an either/or proposition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly View Post
I love playing devil's advocate. (Or in this case would I be playing the opposite role as it seems the devil's advocate would be for sex, no?)
Ah, but what if an angel is just the devil wearing white?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
I'm no Dr. Phil, but I doubt it's because they failed to practice long periods of abstinence.
Yah, 'cause if you were Dr. Phil, you'd feed 'em some bafflegab about how whatever they mutually agree to must be right for them. But then, if mutual agreement was a guarantee you're doing the right thing, no one would ever get divorced.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:20 PM   #249
CrusaderPi
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Self-Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

A year later, I have to wonder.... How'd this all work out?

PS: Sorry for the bump, but not really.
CrusaderPi is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:31 PM   #250
puckluck
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Easter back on in Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
How does this make the Honeymoon extra special? It will only make your Honeymoon extra pre-mature.
Since I couldn't thank this post.


+1
puckluck is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:35 PM   #251
Russic
Dances with Wolves
 
Russic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
Exp:
Default

I bet they caved.
Russic is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:37 PM   #252
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

yeah so what happened anyways? happily married!?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:41 PM   #253
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

How about a pool?

I say: caved in on day 23.
flylock shox is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:43 PM   #254
Russic
Dances with Wolves
 
Russic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
Exp:
Default

Caved day 15
Russic is offline  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:55 PM   #255
Crazy Flamer
First Line Centre
 
Crazy Flamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Day 4.
__________________
Bleeding the Flaming C!!!
Crazy Flamer is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:06 AM   #256
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Does oral count as sex. If it does day 3
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:12 AM   #257
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Does oral count as sex. If it does day 3
Dammit. CC's always thinking outside the box.
flylock shox is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to flylock shox For This Useful Post:
Old 08-25-2010, 12:13 AM   #258
CrusaderPi
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Self-Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

It depends what your definition of is is.
CrusaderPi is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:17 AM   #259
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Well IF they did manage to hold out till the wedding, I bet he still hasn't had sex in a year. Doesn't sex stop once you get married anyways?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:39 AM   #260
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

I never saw this thread in the first place, thanks for bumping. WTF was the OP thinking?
My bet us they caved, or went though with it and it messed up their sex life. No way going through with it could actually be a good and healthy thing.
Winsor_Pilates is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Tags
alternative pleasures , bad decisions , no sex for you


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy