Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2013, 08:48 PM   #1001
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksmasher View Post
Sorry if this has been asked or discussed before but....how is upside determined or estimated? What factors are considered?
It is hard to decide, I'm sure this will be a super tough decision come draft day. Both would be good, Lindholm is growing on me and I wouldn't be disappointed if we go either on Sunday.
foshizzle11 is offline  
Old 06-29-2013, 08:53 PM   #1002
Bezer
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: H E double hockey sticks
Exp:
Default

Trade Gio and 22 and/or28 for 7th overall from the Oilers and draft them both.. Hows that for a slice of fried gold..


I voted Lindholm when the poll went up and I wavered somewhat to Monohan but I am back in the Lindholm camp. I think he is our guy.

Last edited by Bezer; 06-29-2013 at 08:56 PM.
Bezer is offline  
Old 06-29-2013, 09:05 PM   #1003
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
He's holding his stick, there's a stick from out of frame from another player ... but there's a third stick coming from ... his pants?
Clearly Lindholm's penis has equal skills with the puck as his hands.

Lindholm for me.
Huntingwhale is offline  
Old 06-29-2013, 09:10 PM   #1004
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
Clearly Lindholm's penis has equal skills with the puck as his hands.
If that's the case, he should have taken a penalty on that play.

Illegal curve in his dick.
Jay Random is offline  
Old 06-29-2013, 09:10 PM   #1005
Hyde
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Well Monahan is self-admittedly shy so it probably affects how he interviews and especially in front of cameras.
This has me worried, Bouw was not a got interview known to be shy with the camera and people mocked him for it. If the same is with Monahan it will happen too.

I personally would be happy with either Monahan or Lindholm; find myself flipping back and forth.
Hyde is offline  
Old 06-30-2013, 01:02 AM   #1006
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksmasher View Post
Sorry if this has been asked or discussed before but....how is upside determined or estimated? What factors are considered?
Bit of a broad question. Sounds like you're basically asking how scouting works and what factors in to that.

Scouts assess players on:
-size/strength
-skating
-puckhandling
-shot
-vision/playmaking/passing
-hockey sense
-defensive play
-offensive play
-competitiveness
-leadership
-consistency

They do that by watching the players. They watch them against older players, against their peers. They try to watch them in different situations to see how they react to adversity. Watch them when their linemates are injured, watch them in the playoffs, etc.

Then from there it is all projection. How much room to develop does the player have? How strong and fast will they be in a few years? How does their skill stack up to NHL calibre players? Are they teachable? Do they have the character to persevere? How much have they improved over the last year? Two years? How much more can they improve?

The basic question scouts try to answer is, "How good will that player be in the NHL in 5 years if they develop properly?" Perhaps a secondary question is, "What role will that player play in the NHL?" Those answers determine a player's upside. MacKinnon could be a superstar 1st line centre in the NHL if he develops, that's his upside.

Don't know if that was the answer you were looking for
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 11:31 AM   #1007
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Okay The early results are in.

Anyone want to change their vote? or complain that the Canes picked Lindholm or that the Flames didn't tank for Seth Jones?

I was pretty clear in preferring Monahan #6 and Nichushkin #10 over Lindholm #5

Right now the top forwards drafted , outside of Drouin #3 and Horvat #9, are running pretty close to form. It seems pretty clear that Monahan was the best centre available at the 6th spot. I think the Flames were lucky that he fell through to 6. Would have the Flames picked Lindholm or Nichushkin had Monahan been picked in the #5 slot?

The Canes have Lindholm playing on the wing with Jordan Staal and Skinner.
Monahan has had Hudler and Baertschi/Colbourne
Nichushkin has Seguin and Benn (doesn't hurt his numbers)
Mackinnon has had no regular linemates... played the most with Landeskog, ROR and Duschene
Barkov has Brad Boyes and Bergenheim on his wings


Last edited by ricardodw; 03-01-2014 at 11:58 AM.
ricardodw is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 11:35 AM   #1008
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Monahan has been playing with Cammy too which is hurting his game a little I think because Cammy has been just not the same since Iggy left and really was the same Cammy when he came back for his 2nd stint. I really wish Baertschi and Monahan could still be playing on the same line right now.
Heavy Jack is online now  
Old 03-01-2014, 11:36 AM   #1009
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

I wanted Lindholm and stated as such, I also felt that either way we were getting a good player.

I still think Lindholm is going to be a beast, but I'm happy with our guy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2014, 11:38 AM   #1010
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Can't believe I picked Lindholm....for shame Zulu29...for shame.
Zulu29 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zulu29 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2014, 11:45 AM   #1011
PeteLFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Can't wait to judge them in 5-10 years, I think the telling stat will be who is still in the NHL, who is wearing a letter, who has more wins and not just points.
PeteLFan is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteLFan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2014, 11:51 AM   #1012
TKB
Scoring Winger
 
TKB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

I think Monahan was and will be the better pick between the two of them. I would of loved for him to slip to the oilers at that number 7 pick. Hes the perfect 1b/2a center, has size, can score and will be a good 2 way player.
TKB is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 11:57 AM   #1013
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

The 2003 draft there were only 4 forwards that played more than 30 NHL games in their draft year: Eric Staal #2 81 games 31 pts, Horton #3 55 games 22 pts, Zherdev #4 55 games 31 pts, Dustin Brown #13 31 games 5 pts.

Then because of the lock out lost season the rest of them went back to junior for another year.... Drafted - 2 more years of junior and then on to the NHL.

2013 has an early lead on being the best draft ever
ricardodw is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:02 PM   #1014
Komskies
Franchise Player
 
Komskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Looking at Barkov's stats, Baertschi has the point totals after fewer games played.
Komskies is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:12 PM   #1015
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

I think it's way too early to bump this thread. Going into the draft most people thought Monahan was more NHL ready than Lindholm. If anything Lindholm is ahead of most people's projection by being in the NHL already, even if it is on the wing.
Goodlad is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:22 PM   #1016
FightinSioux
Scoring Winger
 
FightinSioux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Dakota, USA
Exp:
Default

We shouldn't be reviewing these two who both will be great hockey players. But instead looking at the oppertunity to have Olli Maatta vs Mark Jankowski
FightinSioux is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:31 PM   #1017
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't see any Boring Elias Lindholm Twitter accounts so win to Monahan!
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2014, 12:51 PM   #1018
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I remember as soon as I saw a pre draft interview with Monahan he was the player I wanted the flames to pick. To me he has captain written all over him. His dedication and preparation to making the team shows his maturity.

Personally I am biased when there is a flip of the coin I think you always go Canadian over Euro.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:59 PM   #1019
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
Can't believe I picked Lindholm....for shame Zulu29...for shame.
I wanted Nichushkin and was disappointed that we didn't get him until we took the slightly worse version of Valeri with Poirier.

It all worked out for the best.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2014, 01:00 PM   #1020
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I wanted Lindholm and stated as such, I also felt that either way we were getting a good player.

I still think Lindholm is going to be a beast, but I'm happy with our guy.
Same here. I was just hoping they weren't going to be stupid and take Nurse.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is online now  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy