Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-11-2013, 04:39 PM   #721
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

i hear scouts comparing Monahan to Eric Staal. I think that might be reaching. I voted Lindholm because he's been a force playing against men. He may have average size and his fearless style of play may get him into trouble some day -- but you just can't pass a guy like that up. I'm not even sure he'll fall to 6th...
cannon7 is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 04:44 PM   #722
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It's fine if they take Monahan, not many people will complain about it. Bottom line is the Flames NEED to make the pick count. Not that picking anyone else is better or worse (I should note though, MacKinnon or Barkov is a clear step above in my book and if there is a shot at one of them there is no contest).
It's just finding the better fitting skill set to compliment the team moving forward.
I don't want the Flames to go down the road of building the team around just one player again, its too constrictive as to how you can build a team.
dammage79 is online now  
Old 05-11-2013, 04:47 PM   #723
Captain_Obvious
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
I voted Lindholm because he's been a force playing against men.
Swedish men who are a step down from the NHL.

I'd take that with a grain of salt, and argue that the tenacity and speed needed to excel in the CHL are just as impressive.

Not saying Lindholm isn't impressive and strong for his age, but I think Monahan would be just as impressive against the men playing in the SEL.
Captain_Obvious is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Captain_Obvious For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2013, 06:48 PM   #724
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Fillip Forsberg is 4 months older than Lindholm.

They both played on the swedish u-18 team in 2011-12 link

Forsberg 16 games 10 goal 5 assist Lindholm 17 games 4 goals 11 assists.


In a supposed weak draft Forsberg went to Washinton 11th overall... In this deep draft Lindholm is slotted to be 5-6???

I was shocked to see that Lindholm was a PIM machine knocking up 35 PIM in the u-18 games. He became shy when he played against the men?

Forsberg got traded to nashville and has 5 NHL games in in the Nashville's drive to the #4 pick.


Maybe Nashville will want to reunite Forsberg and Lindholm and will let Barkov slip to the Canes.
ricardodw is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:01 PM   #725
Captain_Obvious
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
I was shocked to see that Lindholm was a PIM machine knocking up 35 PIM in the u-18 games. He became shy when he played against the men?
What's the matter Ricardow?

Does.not.compute.?

It's because you are only capable of linear one-dimensional thinking, and your idea that PIM is directly related to overall toughness is asinine.
Captain_Obvious is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Captain_Obvious For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2013, 07:03 PM   #726
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Any vote changes when it appears that Lindholm may not be a natural centre.

Link

Quote:
Incidentally, Lindholm didn't take a lot of faceoffs with Brynäs. He wasn't even close to the top four faceoff takers; so I presume was used more as a wing with his club. However, he did line up at center at the international level with Sweden. I'm not really concerned on whether he ends up as a center or a wing. Where he ends up may dictate that regardless
ricardodw is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:10 PM   #727
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious View Post
What's the matter Ricardow?

Does.not.compute.?

It's because you are only capable of linear one-dimensional thinking, and your idea that PIM is directly related to overall toughness is asinine.
What doesn't make sense is that none of the Lindholm is so tough we can't stand it crowd doesn't know how to do a little research and push back at me with some facts rather than feelings.



I get a feeling that someone read a blurb that compared Lindholm to Peter Forsberg who was nails tough and the sheep just went with he has to be tough.


Peter Forsberg , by the way, stayed another 4 years in Sweden and came to Quebec .... not the team that drafted him as a 22 year old.
ricardodw is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:20 PM   #728
Captain_Obvious
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
I get a feeling that someone read a blurb.
Which is funny, because that's EXACTLY what you did... except you didn't even use said blurb to form a sound, sane opinion.

Looking at PIM and drawing a concrete conclusion like you did is ridiculous.

Several people have pointed that out and you've gone off with posts full of broken sentences like a computer program trying to comprehend a code that doesn't compute.

Last edited by Captain_Obvious; 05-11-2013 at 07:35 PM.
Captain_Obvious is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Captain_Obvious For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2013, 07:20 PM   #729
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
What doesn't make sense is that none of the Lindholm is so tough we can't stand it crowd doesn't know how to do a little research and push back at me with some facts rather than feelings.



I get a feeling that someone read a blurb that compared Lindholm to Peter Forsberg who was nails tough and the sheep just went with he has to be tough.


Peter Forsberg , by the way, stayed another 4 years in Sweden and came to Quebec .... not the team that drafted him as a 22 year old.
Come again? I normally understand your posts but these last couple are very hard to comprehend.
FlameZilla is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:25 PM   #730
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

ricardodw is quickly turning into the Alex Jones of the anti-Lindholm movement. It's pretty odd.

You uncover those conspiracies man!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2013, 07:33 PM   #731
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

At least if Lindholm ends up playing wing he'll be filling another major organisational need. We have exactly zero viable RW prospects.

I voted Monahan for many reasons, not the least of which is that he's a natural, confirmed centre with good faceoff abilities.

Toews & Stall comparisons around, but in stature, speed and stride he reminds me of Tavares. Good vision & size. It's what we need in centre ice. Doesn't project to be a Tavares-level game breaker though...
FlameZilla is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 09:10 PM   #732
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
What doesn't make sense is that none of the Lindholm is so tough we can't stand it crowd doesn't know how to do a little research and push back at me with some facts rather than feelings.



I get a feeling that someone read a blurb that compared Lindholm to Peter Forsberg who was nails tough and the sheep just went with he has to be tough.


Peter Forsberg , by the way, stayed another 4 years in Sweden and came to Quebec .... not the team that drafted him as a 22 year old.
Did you actually read that article, or just browse it until you found a blurb that matched your inner dialogue? Here's some quotes from that article:

Quote:
On his own team, he was sixth among forwards which suggests he was in their top six. Within Brynäs, Lindholm was third on the team in points, he led the team in power play goals with eight, he only took one minor penalty all season (!),managed to average a hit per game, and he was eighth on the team with 77 shots on net.
Quote:
Sweden's U-20 coach Roger Ronnberg praised both his "smartness" and "grit" for the game.
This is the full quote from the National Team coach.
Quote:
Ronnberg said Lindholm’s potential is limitless and with more seasoning and experience in the SEL he could develop into a sure-fire NHLer.
“He can be a tremendous player,” said the national team coach. “He has the smartness and he has the grit to play – he has the most important combination and that is both the will to compete hard and the smarts to be a really good player.”
I've yet to see any profile that doesn't comment on his grit and ability to protect the puck and play in high traffic areas, yet you seem insistent on looking at one single stat and labeling him soft.
Goodlad is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 10:28 PM   #733
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Some rumours on https://twitter.com/BoltProspects saying that the Lightning have Nichushkin ranked #1 as it currently stands. That would mean Drouin or Barkov would fall to Carolina.

I think that would be a very serious situation to swap picks with the Hurricanes.

Last edited by Ashasx; 05-11-2013 at 11:09 PM.
Ashasx is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:16 PM   #734
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Some rumours on https://twitter.com/BoltProspects saying that the Lightning have Nichushkin ranked #1 as it currently stands. That would mean Drouin or Barkov would fall to Carolina.

I think that would be a very serious situation to swap picks with the Hurricanes.
Take all the pre-draft leaks with a grain of salt. It's fair to say that most teams are very tight lipped around the draft as it's a game of high stakes poker with teams not wanting to give any real information on what players they covet. I highly doubt that Yzerman and his staff would be telling anyone who they like. False information may be purposely spread as well as the usual made up crap from basement bloggers that fills the internet.
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2013, 11:26 PM   #735
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Tampa taking Nichushkin at 3 would be a pleasant surprise on draft day.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:32 PM   #736
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Any vote changes when it appears that Lindholm may not be a natural centre.

Link
Why would there be? If not a center he plays RW (Still thinks he ends up being a Center), yet another glaring need on the Flames depth charts. Which is yet another reason Lindholm would make a great pick for the Flames. RH shot with high skill are tough to come by, Luckily there are one or two good ones in the top seven.
dammage79 is online now  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:35 PM   #737
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

If the Nichushkin and Tampa rumors are true, would it not make sense for them to trade down to 6th?

If Yzerman believes Nashville has soured on Russians and the drafting history of the Canes indicate they won't draft a European skater, then he should open to trading down and picking up another asset.
sureLoss is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:38 PM   #738
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Why would there be? If not a center he plays RW (Still thinks he ends up being a Center), yet another glaring need on the Flames depth charts. Which is yet another reason Lindholm would make a great pick for the Flames. RH shot with high skill are tough to come by, Luckily there are one or two good ones in the top seven.

I agree that he fills a major need on either position. Unfortunatley i don't think he makes it to the flames because he could be used as RW or Center. I really think Carolina takes him.
kyuss275 is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:39 PM   #739
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
If the Nichushkin and Tampa rumors are true, would it not make sense for them to trade down to 6th?

If Yzerman believes Nashville has soured on Russians and the drafting history of the Canes indicate they won't draft a European skater, then he should open to trading down and picking up another asset.
It totally would ... for something like the 6th and something like, say the 27th?

Sounds good to me
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 05-11-2013, 11:41 PM   #740
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I agree that he fills a major need on either position. Unfortunatley i don't think he makes it to the flames because he could be used as RW or Center. I really think Carolina takes him.
Well if that ends up being the case and Nichushkin goes to TB. Then I cannot see how Nashville passes on Drouin. Which then leaves us my personal favorite, Barkov! This is going to be an exciting draft!
dammage79 is online now  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy