Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2016, 05:09 PM   #2281
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
After reading that, wow does Tkachuk ever have a lot of secondary assists.
Is this a new thing? Trying to devalue second assists? I've been watching hockey and the draft for 20+ years now and this year is the first I can remember where a bunch of people are trashing prospects for having secondary assists. I don't really agree with the reasoning. You'd have to look at every goal to determine whether the assists were big or not.

Tkachuk meanwhile is 2nd in OHL playoff scoring behind his line mate Marner and has 10 goals and 12 assists in 10 games. 22 points in 10 games. Pretty dang good for a 17 year old no? He's proven he can play a complimentary style with high skilled offensive players. He's helped form one of the best lines in all of junior hockey and he's looked good on Auston Matthews' wing as well.

If these secondary assists were as big of a problem as some are making them out to be I don't think Tkachuk would be a consensus top 7 pick and Nylander wouldn't be a consensus top 10 pick. Those numbers don't make me think twice at all.

From what I've seen Nylander has tremendous vision and shooting, exactly as advertised. We all knew he wasn't a banger and he's going to need to add strength, nothing shocking there. If the Flames want to add a winger with pure skill he's a good option. I'm still of the opinion that they'd rather add a winger who has size, strength and physicality to go with high skill (Tkachuk/Dubois.)
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 05:25 PM   #2282
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
I'm still of the opinion that they'd rather add a winger who has size, strength and physicality to go with high skill (Tkachuk/Dubois.)
Yeah sure, take Dubois/Tkachuk if they are available. If not it gets a little murkier and we start to look at Nylander, McLeod and the three defencemen.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 05:27 PM   #2283
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
6'2" already, 180 lbs at the very least. How this guy slots in out of the top 6 is confusing as C is the most highly coveted spot in drafting and the only other legit C above him is Matthews. If the Flames stick at 5, BPA defaults to C by a majority of metrics. RH/C with potential to convert to RW? Bennett/McLeod 2018. Who cares who centers on that line. It'll be deadly and at the same time, responsible.
Dubois is a centre that everybody except McKeen's has quite a bit ahead of McLeod. Logan Brown is another dark horse to go top 10, big 6'6 centre.

Very much disagree that BPA defaults to C if we sit at 5. Not sure what you're talking about there. Top 3 defensemen are arguably as valuable or moreso than 2nd line centres. The BPA at 5, 6 or 7 could certainly be a winger as well, not sure why you'd discount that possibility.

With Monahan, Bennett, Backlund and Jankowski we are pretty much set at centre for a decade. McLeod projects as a centre, haven't seen a single source anywhere that talks about him shifting to the wing. I know he's the guy you are championing but it just doesn't add up at all.

What evidence is there that this guy is a top 6 worthy pick? I know you like him ahead of Nylander but that doesn't mean he's top 6 worthy, you can't ignore the other players in contention.

McLeod is ranked:
Then we have McKeens having him at #3. Outside of them we could say that he's consensus to NOT go top 8. I don't think you'd done enough to convince us that he's the best option at #6 or #7. Most scouting services and sources wouldn't take him top 8. Add in that we're really deep at centre and it makes even less sense.

It'll be interesting to see him a bit more for myself at the U18s.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 05:38 PM   #2284
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

One thing to consider about McLeod is that if we convert him to RW, his ability to take right circle draws could have serious benefits for our future PP as all top centers are left-shooting.

My reservation with him isn't hands, position, or IQ it's his shot. If he has a 22+ goal shot then I can see why people would want to take him sooner, but if he's a 14-16 goal shot then maybe not.

"Is Mike McLeod a player who will play on the power play in the NHL"?
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 04-15-2016 at 05:42 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 05:53 PM   #2285
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Some jersey numbers for projected 1st rounders from Canada at the U18s

Defense
4 - Fabbro
5 - Chychrun

Forwards
7 - Jost
9 - Laberge
22 - McLeod
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 06:02 PM   #2286
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Where would have Bennett gone if he was 17/18 still and in this draft?
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 06:04 PM   #2287
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Where would have Bennett gone if he was 17/18 still and in this draft?
I'm guessing in the #3-4 range.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 06:07 PM   #2288
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Where would have Bennett gone if he was 17/18 still and in this draft?
Dubois and Bennett seem to be comparable as prospects, Bennett faster, Dubois bigger.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 06:21 PM   #2289
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Early in this CAN-DEN game but McLeod has turned over the puck twice at his own blue line, the first one resulted in Denmark's 1st goal. :P I will provide more updates as it goes on. CAN 2-2 DEN 7 mins in.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 06:27 PM   #2290
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Would McLeod be classified as a safe pick or a risky pick?
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 06:39 PM   #2291
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would McLeod be classified as a safe pick or a risky pick?
Safe pick. May not be ranked highly but a lot of folks think he'll at least be an NHL'er. Just as with all things though, you want that elite top end with a high pick. What is elite about McLeod just doesn't seem to be accepted as top pick material save one or two publications. His offense output seems to scare a lot of folks. But in two seasons in the OHL he has doubled his numbers in less GP.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 06:59 PM   #2292
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would McLeod be classified as a safe pick or a risky pick?
Safe pick for sure. NHL size and skating. He excels in work ethic, two-way play, playmaking and face-offs. Biggest question mark on him is his shot and scoring. Most scouts don't seem to think he has 1st line potential and his 21 goals this year would probably concur.

He's a great prospect but I think the Flames will be taking someone they like even more if I had to guess.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 07:42 PM   #2293
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Is this a new thing? Trying to devalue second assists? I've been watching hockey and the draft for 20+ years now and this year is the first I can remember where a bunch of people are trashing prospects for having secondary assists. I don't really agree with the reasoning. You'd have to look at every goal to determine whether the assists were big or not.

Tkachuk meanwhile is 2nd in OHL playoff scoring behind his line mate Marner and has 10 goals and 12 assists in 10 games. 22 points in 10 games. Pretty dang good for a 17 year old no? He's proven he can play a complimentary style with high skilled offensive players. He's helped form one of the best lines in all of junior hockey and he's looked good on Auston Matthews' wing as well.

If these secondary assists were as big of a problem as some are making them out to be I don't think Tkachuk would be a consensus top 7 pick and Nylander wouldn't be a consensus top 10 pick. Those numbers don't make me think twice at all.

From what I've seen Nylander has tremendous vision and shooting, exactly as advertised. We all knew he wasn't a banger and he's going to need to add strength, nothing shocking there. If the Flames want to add a winger with pure skill he's a good option. I'm still of the opinion that they'd rather add a winger who has size, strength and physicality to go with high skill (Tkachuk/Dubois.)
The article was talking about secondary assists and putting down Nylander. I was being facetious.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 07:47 PM   #2294
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Still a power outage in ND. Canada still waiting to play the 3rd period.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 08:44 PM   #2295
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would McLeod be classified as a safe pick or a risky pick?
Safe pick. Elite skater and elite engine. At worst he'll be a Matthew Lombardi.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 08:52 PM   #2296
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
The article was talking about secondary assists and putting down Nylander. I was being facetious.
Yeah I didn't assume you bought into it. But I've seen people dismissing Tkachuk because of secondary assists. Doesn't make much sense to me. I'd be fine with him getting secondary assists off Monahan and Gaudreau goals all day long.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 08:53 PM   #2297
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Still a power outage in ND. Canada still waiting to play the 3rd period.
Game is back on. I missed a lot of the 2nd cause I switched over to the 3rd period of the NHL games. 3rd period is just starting
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 09:10 PM   #2298
greentree
First Line Centre
 
greentree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stampede Corral
Exp:
Default

Chychrun has not had a great night vs. Denmark. Skates well for sure but defensively a bit suspect imho. Fair to say no one will be raving about his performance. Not writing him off but disappointed, he's a better player than he's shown tonight.
greentree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 09:26 PM   #2299
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greentree View Post
Chychrun has not had a great night vs. Denmark. Skates well for sure but defensively a bit suspect imho. Fair to say no one will be raving about his performance. Not writing him off but disappointed, he's a better player than he's shown tonight.
Final was 10-2.

I didn't think he looked poor although I did miss a chunk of the 2nd. Great skater, loves to jump up, doesn't hesitate to shoot, gets off a quick one time slapshot. He did lose his man occasionally. Like how he uses his stick and reach as the rush is coming to him. Be nice to see him vs tougher competition.

Jost was the guy who stood out the most to me out of the 1st rounders. Hadn't seen him before. Excellent patience and poise with the puck. Holds on to the puck that extra second or two while the play develops and then makes his move. Excellent puck handling and shooting instincts.

Fabbro has a big long reach. RH defensemen who moves the puck well and looks at home on the power play.

McLeod was meh. Made a few poor plays exiting his zone. Showed his speed. Certainly didn't show that much offence.

Kyrou obviously had the biggest game with 4 goals. Think he's rated in the 2nd round range. Nice selection of goals including a tip and a top corner snipe.

They showed Treliving at the game.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2016, 09:29 PM   #2300
bucksmasher
Scoring Winger
 
bucksmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Yeah I didn't assume you bought into it. But I've seen people dismissing Tkachuk because of secondary assists. Doesn't make much sense to me. I'd be fine with him getting secondary assists off Monahan and Gaudreau goals all day long.
I don't get why you think the next forward drafted is going to play with Jonny and mony. That line is good, it's scoring. The team needs line #2 to start performing. Hopefully Bennett or backlund and the next skilled forward can do that job.
bucksmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bucksmasher For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
2016 nhl draft , nhl draft , nhl entry draft


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy