Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2016, 09:02 AM   #281
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't see how moving Hamilton makes sense at all.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:03 AM   #282
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
If the Flames traded Hamilton for the 4th pick it is definitely selling high. No way would a team trade the 4th pick for the 15th, 45th, and 52nd picks. The problem is the Flames have some great blueline depth but those players are 2-3 years away.
That's not about how asset management works. By that logic Yakupov is still worth a 1st overall pick.

The Hamilton deal was a steal when it happened. After a rough start he put together his most productive year and is still improving from where he left off in Boston. Also signed to a reasonable deal that any NHL team would of been happy with.

Hamilton's value is much greater than what it was when Treliving fleeced Sweeney.

G.Reinhart isn't worth close to what he paid and the Oilers wouldn't be expecting that much back if he was to be traded (well maybe they would because they are the Oilers). Stock rises and drops. It doesn't stay the same even after only a year.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:03 AM   #283
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
The issue I have is by switching Hamilton for a dman at six is you are giving up a few years of development time before that dman at six is at the level Hamilton is at. Is that worth the price to get to 4?
I'm with you, I think the counter argument though is, some might argue the Flames have 3 number 1 D-men.

Brodie will be our new number 1 (if he's not already), Gio's is fantastic as a number two, do you really need another potential #1, or in a cap world, are you better to go out and try and replace Hamilton with something else and fill a preceived void up front?

For the record, I'm not there myself, based on the returns floating around I'd love to keep Hamilton, but the above is the logic behind entertaining a trade with him.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:07 AM   #284
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
I'm with you, I think the counter argument though is, some might argue the Flames have 3 number 1 D-men.

Brodie will be our new number 1 (if he's not already), Gio's is fantastic as a number two, do you really need another potential #1, or in a cap world, are you better to go out and try and replace Hamilton with something else and fill a preceived void up front?

For the record, I'm not there myself, based on the returns floating around I'd love to keep Hamilton, but the above is the logic behind entertaining a trade with him.
If the logic is we can't have 3 number one defencemen then I think you have to trade Giordano. He's got a bigger contract, is older and will likely be declining just when Hamilton is hitting his prime. For the record I don't want to trade either of Gio or Hamilton.
Zulu29 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Zulu29 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:08 AM   #285
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
Hamilton to the Oilers make me very nervous, even if we walk away from the draft with Joulevi and Tkachuk
wouldn't it be toronto who's interested in getting joulevi and tkachuk? uniting them with marner.
can't wait for sureloss to start the 'flames interested in auston mathews' thread
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:08 AM   #286
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lol a proposal by an Oil fan on HF.

"I could see Chiareli doing a deal around Hamilton and 4th. Maybe Hamilton + Jankowski + 2nd(s) for 4th? HF would implode but it could solve issues for both teams"
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:09 AM   #287
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

If the plan is to trade Hamilton for 4OV to draft Tkachuk and Juolevi and then acquire Bishop, what are we giving up to acquire Bishop? This years 35th overall? Next year's first rounder? Why doesn't BT do that without trading Hamilton? Doesn't make sense. Still feel like BT is trolling.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:10 AM   #288
dakeyras
Farm Team Player
 
dakeyras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I doubt Hamilton gets moved. For all of the reasons everyone has already contributed.

However, if Hamilton were to be traded, I could see it being part 1 of a 2 part trade.

1. Calgary trades Hamilton for 4th overall.

2. Calgary picks with both #4/#6

3. Calgary trades a couple of forward prospects and maybe a 2nd rounder to Anaheim, a team with an internal budget, for Fowler.

Of course, there's been talk that Fowler might go to Buffalo and the #8 pick will be included in the return, Anaheim's price might be out of range. And I can't really see Anaheim sending Fowler to a division rival.
dakeyras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:11 AM   #289
Inglewood Jack
#1 Goaltender
 
Inglewood Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Exp:
Default

every comment imported from HF onto this board lowers my IQ by a couple of points. sometimes I wish these were all just quarantined into their own little "HF is no good" thread or something.
Inglewood Jack is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Inglewood Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:13 AM   #290
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Hamilton isn't going anywhere. Treliving did not come down with a severe case of brain damage in the last 24 hours. Him and Brodie are the 1/2 pairing of the foreseeable future.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:14 AM   #291
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Too many in the media and some GM'S get swept up with "oh new shiny car scenario" when it comes to low draft picks and the key pieces they have in place. I don't believe Treliving when it comes to what the Flames behind closed doors establish as their core players is like that.
Treliving is not going to add by subtracting a key player. Not only that Treliving is not going to strengthen his competition by gifting Hamilton or Gio to them. Wideman yes.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:15 AM   #292
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

There are some real "dim bulbs" over there. That's for sure.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:15 AM   #293
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

I wonder if us shopping Hamilton could be in anticipation of CBJ not taking Puljujarvi. Maybe the only way we move Hamilton is if it is to take the Finn at 4 if he drops down a spot.

Who could make him drop? Logan Brown. I can see it for sure - if you are picking for position and need a C but dont believe Puljujarvi could play there in the NHL - you may just swing for the fences with Logan Brown and maybe that leaves Puljujarvi - a dream fit for the Flames...to Edmonton; in which case we would throw Hamilton at them to have him?

Thats the only scenario I can think of that involves the Flames sending Hamilton to Edmonton.
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:16 AM   #294
gpflamesfan
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grande Prairie
Exp:
Default

If your team finishes the season 25th overall everyone better be available if there is a potential trade that will make your team better. I'm not advocating we trade Hamilton but if the return is outrageous you have to do it.
gpflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gpflamesfan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:16 AM   #295
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

put me in the camp of surprised if the flames move dougie - seems like he currently has a cap friendly deal given his role on the team and his evolution over the past season

while I would not be excited to see the flames trade gio, it could solve issues of him potentially seeming like he is overpaid in a few years.
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:19 AM   #296
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

ehh ... I wouldn't say he has a "cap friendly" deal. His deal is ok and should get better value wise.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:22 AM   #297
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Step 1: Let Edmonton think that Hamilton might be available for 4th overall
Step 2: Edmonton relaxes their pursuit of Subban because Hamilton fits under their cap better and Calgary is just asking for the pick and no additional players
Step 3: After Montreal pulls Subban off the table, tell the Oilers that Hamilton isn't available, but Wideman is
Step 4: Profit!
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 09:23 AM   #298
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Dougie to Columbus for third overall? Perhaps.

Dougie to Edmonton/Chiarelli? That should be rejected on principle alone.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:24 AM   #299
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

No trades with Edmonton please, don't need their stink
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:24 AM   #300
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Step 1: Let Edmonton think that Hamilton might be available for 4th overall
Step 2: Edmonton relaxes their pursuit of Subban because Hamilton fits under their cap better and Calgary is just asking for the pick and no additional players
Step 3: After Montreal pulls Subban off the table, tell the Oilers that Hamilton isn't available, but Wideman is
Step 4: Profit!
Agree with steps 1 to 3. Don't think step 4 will happen -- we're talking about Chiarelli here, not Benning
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy