06-24-2016, 09:02 AM
|
#281
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I don't see how moving Hamilton makes sense at all.
|
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
Bourque's Twin,
BurningYears,
calgarybornnraised,
devo22,
Domoic,
Gaskal,
greyshep,
Incogneto,
jaikorven,
Lonestar,
MarchHare,
MrMastodonFarm,
Otto-matic,
Patek23,
Phaneufenstein,
ResAlien,
Roof-Daddy,
smiggy77,
socalwingfan,
theTrumanShow,
Zulu29
|
06-24-2016, 09:03 AM
|
#282
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
If the Flames traded Hamilton for the 4th pick it is definitely selling high. No way would a team trade the 4th pick for the 15th, 45th, and 52nd picks. The problem is the Flames have some great blueline depth but those players are 2-3 years away.
|
That's not about how asset management works. By that logic Yakupov is still worth a 1st overall pick.
The Hamilton deal was a steal when it happened. After a rough start he put together his most productive year and is still improving from where he left off in Boston. Also signed to a reasonable deal that any NHL team would of been happy with.
Hamilton's value is much greater than what it was when Treliving fleeced Sweeney.
G.Reinhart isn't worth close to what he paid and the Oilers wouldn't be expecting that much back if he was to be traded (well maybe they would because they are the Oilers). Stock rises and drops. It doesn't stay the same even after only a year.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:03 AM
|
#283
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
The issue I have is by switching Hamilton for a dman at six is you are giving up a few years of development time before that dman at six is at the level Hamilton is at. Is that worth the price to get to 4?
|
I'm with you, I think the counter argument though is, some might argue the Flames have 3 number 1 D-men.
Brodie will be our new number 1 (if he's not already), Gio's is fantastic as a number two, do you really need another potential #1, or in a cap world, are you better to go out and try and replace Hamilton with something else and fill a preceived void up front?
For the record, I'm not there myself, based on the returns floating around I'd love to keep Hamilton, but the above is the logic behind entertaining a trade with him.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#284
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
I'm with you, I think the counter argument though is, some might argue the Flames have 3 number 1 D-men.
Brodie will be our new number 1 (if he's not already), Gio's is fantastic as a number two, do you really need another potential #1, or in a cap world, are you better to go out and try and replace Hamilton with something else and fill a preceived void up front?
For the record, I'm not there myself, based on the returns floating around I'd love to keep Hamilton, but the above is the logic behind entertaining a trade with him.
|
If the logic is we can't have 3 number one defencemen then I think you have to trade Giordano. He's got a bigger contract, is older and will likely be declining just when Hamilton is hitting his prime. For the record I don't want to trade either of Gio or Hamilton.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Zulu29 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:08 AM
|
#285
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123
Hamilton to the Oilers make me very nervous, even if we walk away from the draft with Joulevi and Tkachuk
|
wouldn't it be toronto who's interested in getting joulevi and tkachuk? uniting them with marner.
can't wait for sureloss to start the 'flames interested in auston mathews' thread
__________________
is your cat doing singing?
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:08 AM
|
#286
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Lol a proposal by an Oil fan on HF.
"I could see Chiareli doing a deal around Hamilton and 4th. Maybe Hamilton + Jankowski + 2nd(s) for 4th? HF would implode but it could solve issues for both teams"
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:09 AM
|
#287
|
Posted the 2 millionth post!
|
If the plan is to trade Hamilton for 4OV to draft Tkachuk and Juolevi and then acquire Bishop, what are we giving up to acquire Bishop? This years 35th overall? Next year's first rounder? Why doesn't BT do that without trading Hamilton? Doesn't make sense. Still feel like BT is trolling.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:10 AM
|
#288
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp: 
|
I doubt Hamilton gets moved. For all of the reasons everyone has already contributed.
However, if Hamilton were to be traded, I could see it being part 1 of a 2 part trade.
1. Calgary trades Hamilton for 4th overall.
2. Calgary picks with both #4/#6
3. Calgary trades a couple of forward prospects and maybe a 2nd rounder to Anaheim, a team with an internal budget, for Fowler.
Of course, there's been talk that Fowler might go to Buffalo and the #8 pick will be included in the return, Anaheim's price might be out of range. And I can't really see Anaheim sending Fowler to a division rival.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:11 AM
|
#289
|
#1 Goaltender
|
every comment imported from HF onto this board lowers my IQ by a couple of points. sometimes I wish these were all just quarantined into their own little "HF is no good" thread or something.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Inglewood Jack For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:13 AM
|
#290
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
|
Hamilton isn't going anywhere. Treliving did not come down with a severe case of brain damage in the last 24 hours. Him and Brodie are the 1/2 pairing of the foreseeable future.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:14 AM
|
#291
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
Too many in the media and some GM'S get swept up with "oh new shiny car scenario" when it comes to low draft picks and the key pieces they have in place. I don't believe Treliving when it comes to what the Flames behind closed doors establish as their core players is like that.
Treliving is not going to add by subtracting a key player. Not only that Treliving is not going to strengthen his competition by gifting Hamilton or Gio to them. Wideman yes.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#292
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
There are some real "dim bulbs" over there. That's for sure.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#293
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
|
I wonder if us shopping Hamilton could be in anticipation of CBJ not taking Puljujarvi. Maybe the only way we move Hamilton is if it is to take the Finn at 4 if he drops down a spot.
Who could make him drop? Logan Brown. I can see it for sure - if you are picking for position and need a C but dont believe Puljujarvi could play there in the NHL - you may just swing for the fences with Logan Brown and maybe that leaves Puljujarvi - a dream fit for the Flames...to Edmonton; in which case we would throw Hamilton at them to have him?
Thats the only scenario I can think of that involves the Flames sending Hamilton to Edmonton.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:16 AM
|
#294
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grande Prairie
Exp: 
|
If your team finishes the season 25th overall everyone better be available if there is a potential trade that will make your team better. I'm not advocating we trade Hamilton but if the return is outrageous you have to do it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gpflamesfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:16 AM
|
#295
|
Franchise Player
|
put me in the camp of surprised if the flames move dougie - seems like he currently has a cap friendly deal given his role on the team and his evolution over the past season
while I would not be excited to see the flames trade gio, it could solve issues of him potentially seeming like he is overpaid in a few years.
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#296
|
Franchise Player
|
ehh ... I wouldn't say he has a "cap friendly" deal. His deal is ok and should get better value wise.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:22 AM
|
#297
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Step 1: Let Edmonton think that Hamilton might be available for 4th overall
Step 2: Edmonton relaxes their pursuit of Subban because Hamilton fits under their cap better and Calgary is just asking for the pick and no additional players
Step 3: After Montreal pulls Subban off the table, tell the Oilers that Hamilton isn't available, but Wideman is
Step 4: Profit!
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:23 AM
|
#298
|
Franchise Player
|
Dougie to Columbus for third overall? Perhaps.
Dougie to Edmonton/Chiarelli? That should be rejected on principle alone.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:24 AM
|
#299
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
|
No trades with Edmonton please, don't need their stink
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 09:24 AM
|
#300
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Step 1: Let Edmonton think that Hamilton might be available for 4th overall
Step 2: Edmonton relaxes their pursuit of Subban because Hamilton fits under their cap better and Calgary is just asking for the pick and no additional players
Step 3: After Montreal pulls Subban off the table, tell the Oilers that Hamilton isn't available, but Wideman is
Step 4: Profit!
|
Agree with steps 1 to 3. Don't think step 4 will happen -- we're talking about Chiarelli here, not Benning
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.
|
|