Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Assuming a term of 7 years what will Gaudreau's AAV end up being?
6.500 - 6.625 9 1.28%
6.625 - 6.750 5 0.71%
6.750 - 6.875 21 2.99%
6.875 - 7.000 59 8.40%
7.000 - 7.125 89 12.68%
7.125 - 7.250 85 12.11%
7.250 - 7.375 112 15.95%
7.375 - 7.500 102 14.53%
7.500 - 7.625 71 10.11%
7.625 - 7.750 38 5.41%
7.750 - 7.875 39 5.56%
7.875 - 8.000 33 4.70%
8.000 - 8.125 21 2.99%
8.125 - 8.250 6 0.85%
8.250 - 8.375 1 0.14%
8.375 - 8.500 11 1.57%
Voters: 702. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-08-2016, 10:08 PM   #681
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

I sure hope this is Francis being Francis...

i love Gaudreau, but an 8 million ask at this point seems pretty inflated.
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:10 PM   #682
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
Not sure that Tarasenko is renowned for his 2-way play ... He's pretty lost in the D-zone.
He's not ever gonna win a Selke but he's come a long way, started killing penalties this year for Hitch even.

Not like Johnny's terrible either in his own zone but I think that part of his game still has a long ways to go and is behind Tarasenko, subjective I guess but Tarasenko is a 220lb tank and that 70lbs makes a big difference in puck battles.

Not trying to crap on Johnny anyway, I love his game, I just don't see anything north of 7 mil as fair value. For me I'd put the 5 RFA years at 5-5.5 and his 2 or 3 UFA years at 8-8.5 max on the open market if that's what a proven consistent guy like Stamkos is getting. So I think the Flames are right in the ballpark on fair market value for a 7 or 8 year deal talking in that 6.5 per neighborhood.

Johnny forgoes some potential upside but the Flames trade some risk and security for that.
Matty81 is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:12 PM   #683
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
What is stupid is the viewpoint that the Flames are operating on something so simplistic or arbitrary.
I didn't specify the exact terms of such a cap. It just seems, from an outsider's perspective, that the Flames are trying to make their captain their highest-paid player. What is stupid is the viewpoint that things can't be simplified down to one sentence.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is online now  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:13 PM   #684
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
I sure hope this is Francis being Francis...

i love Gaudreau, but an 8 million ask at this point seems pretty inflated.
Like him or not - Francis has connections within the Flames. And he's broken a couple of big items.
And this jives with where the negotiations appear to be stalling.
So I think he's probably got something here that is pretty accurate.
JiriHrdina is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:18 PM   #685
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
Not trying to crap on Johnny anyway, I love his game, I just don't see anything north of 7 mil as fair value. For me I'd put the 5 RFA years at 5-5.5 and his 2 or 3 UFA years at 8-8.5 max on the open market if that's what a proven consistent guy like Stamkos is getting.So I think the Flames are right in the ballpark on fair market value for a 7 or 8 year deal talking in that 6.5 per neighborhood.
I'm with you on the UFA year value, but I think you're really selling short on the RFA years at only 5-5.5 per. Remember Monahan's contract structure:

RFA 1: 6.375
RFA 2: 6.375
RFA 3: 6.75
RFA 4: 6.75
UFA 1: 6.0
UFA 2: 6.125
UFA 3: 6.0

It's definitely peculiar that the UFA years are cheaper than RFA and I don't expect this phenomenon to happen with Johnny's contract, but Johnny's RFA years are not likely to come as cheap as you were hoping.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:23 PM   #686
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

If Johnny's truly dead set on 8 maybe it's time to pick up the phone and see what Philly's willing to offer...
ResAlien is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:25 PM   #687
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
I'm with you on the UFA year value, but I think you're really selling short on the RFA years at only 5-5.5 per. Remember Monahan's contract structure:

RFA 1: 6.375
RFA 2: 6.375
RFA 3: 6.75
RFA 4: 6.75
UFA 1: 6.0
UFA 2: 6.125
UFA 3: 6.0

It's definitely peculiar that the UFA years are cheaper than RFA and I don't expect this phenomenon to happen with Johnny's contract, but Johnny's RFA years are not likely to come as cheap as you were hoping.
There's no way he gets less for his 3 UFA years then his RFA years value wise. I think that's just how they are actually paying him the money and doesn't reflect the actual value per year.

My random guess on Monahan would be 5.5 x4 for his RFA years and then about 7.5 for his 3 UFA years.
Matty81 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:28 PM   #688
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
Like him or not - Francis has connections within the Flames. And he's broken a couple of big items.
And this jives with where the negotiations appear to be stalling.
So I think he's probably got something here that is pretty accurate.
you are probably right considering how long things are taking... i am just hoping he is wrong...

hoping that they can try for a 4 year bridge at 7-7.5? (not sure if there is a better solution)
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:31 PM   #689
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
I sure hope this is Francis being Francis...

i love Gaudreau, but an 8 million ask at this point seems pretty inflated.
I recall Francis guaranteeing Bruce Boudreau was going to be named the Flames head coach so I would definately take anything he says with a grain of salt.
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:32 PM   #690
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
you are probably right considering how long things are taking... i am just hoping he is wrong...

hoping that they can try for a 4 year bridge at 7-7.5? (not sure if there is a better solution)

If they are going to pay him anything beginning with the number 7...it better be for 7 or 8 years.

If its a bridge it simply cannot be anything North of 5-5.5
transplant99 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:32 PM   #691
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If Johnny's truly dead set on 8 maybe it's time to pick up the phone and see what Philly's willing to offer...

Barf. There are about 20 other teams that have a more attractive negotiating position than the Flyers. Not that I think the Flames are anywhere near the point of exploring trade options, but for a RFA with no NTC they will not be pigeonholed into dealing with one team.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:32 PM   #692
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
you are probably right considering how long things are taking... i am just hoping he is wrong...

hoping that they can try for a 4 year bridge at 7-7.5? (not sure if there is a better solution)
Samonadreau is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:32 PM   #693
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I recall Francis guaranteeing Bruce Boudreau was going to be named the Flames head coach so I would definately take anything he says with a grain of salt.
Do you recall Francis saying Monahan was on the brink of being signed, followed by the next day, when Monahan was signed?
Mr.Coffee is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:33 PM   #694
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
I sure hope this is Francis being Francis...

i love Gaudreau, but an 8 million ask at this point seems pretty inflated.
If Francis were wrong Johnny would probably be signed by now. I think he's on to something here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
I'm with you on the UFA year value, but I think you're really selling short on the RFA years at only 5-5.5 per. Remember Monahan's contract structure:

RFA 1: 6.375
RFA 2: 6.375
RFA 3: 6.75
RFA 4: 6.75
UFA 1: 6.0
UFA 2: 6.125
UFA 3: 6.0

It's definitely peculiar that the UFA years are cheaper than RFA and I don't expect this phenomenon to happen with Johnny's contract, but Johnny's RFA years are not likely to come as cheap as you were hoping.
Just because they front loaded the cash as a quasi-bonus doesn't mean that reflects how they valued his RFA and UFA years. My guess is the valuation was roughly 4x$5.5M + 3x$7.5 = 7x$6.375M.
Frequitude is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:34 PM   #695
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Personally I think Gaudreau is worth the 7 or 8 year deal for anywhere from 7-7.5MM, but I would stop there.

Also, to those saying Bennett could become just as good or better, honestly I don't see it in Bennett. Bennett strikes me as more of a really solid, 60 point guy. Not an 80 point superstar guy that I could see Gaudreau being. That said Bennett is still really young. I'm hoping Tkachuk could be a guy like that though.
Mr.Coffee is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:35 PM   #696
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Do you recall Francis saying Monahan was on the brink of being signed, followed by the next day, when Monahan was signed?
So sometimes he's right and sometimes he's wrong? Like I said take it with a grain of salt.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:35 PM   #697
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

Treliving is a ****ing moron if he thinks he can get Johnny at 6.5 for term... Remember when it was Johnny's fault for the hold out because Calgary paid Monahan and therefore have already offered Johnny good money? Maybe I wasn't wrong after all?

He's our best player. Face of the franchise. Why would you insult him with low ball offers? If you don't want to pay him what he's worth, trade him to somebody who will. This is starting to get embarrassing.
Gaudreauvertime is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:36 PM   #698
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

6.5 isn't a lowball at all. It's where a negotiator should start.
Mr.Coffee is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2016, 10:37 PM   #699
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
So sometimes he's right and sometimes he's wrong? Like I said take it with a grain of salt.
Oh? Do you know reporters that are right 100% of the time?
Mr.Coffee is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 10:37 PM   #700
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudreauvertime View Post
Treliving is a ****ing moron if he thinks he can get Johnny at 6.5 for term... Remember when it was Johnny's fault for the hold out because Calgary paid Monahan and therefore have already offered Johnny good money? Maybe I wasn't wrong after all?

He's our best player. Face of the franchise. Why would you insult him with low ball offers? If you don't want to pay him what he's worth, trade him to somebody who will. This is starting to get embarrassing.
I think your post is kind of embarrassing. According to you the Flames should roll over for all their RFA's and give them UFA paydays. Sorry but it doesn't work that way at all.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
obsession , roxette


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy