Male circumcision tied to less sexual pleasure (Reuters Health)

[pylon]

Originally Posted by jhunt223

Meh... It feels better when it looks like they aren't enjoying themselves anyway. The more degrading the better.

From what your girlfriend told us, you can't afford to give up any more skin in that department. So you should be thankful your parents didn't cut you!

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by jhunt223

Meh... It feels better when it looks like they aren't enjoying themselves anyway. The more degrading the better.

Who hurt you?

[Sakari]

The girls like them cut, it looks better and feels better. As guys, aren't we supposed to do what the girl wants, not what we want? That's my philosophy. So what it doesn't feel as good? It still feels good, so who gives a flying ####?

[pylon]

But as a guy that is cut, it steel feels good. Better than anything else. So I don't feel I am missing out on anything. It is like asking a man born without arms, what it feels like, to not have arms.

[evman150]

Originally Posted by pylon

LOL, anteaters are always the ones that are all butthurt when any circumcision debate is brought up. Personally I think it is a needless practice. But.... ask any woman that isn't involved with you sexually, what they prefer to get in 'close contact' with, and 90% of them will ewwwwwwwww at the wind sock.

Chicks prefer the helmet. "It isn't as juicy." is what one girlfriend said to me... which made me laugh....then gag till I puked.

Here's a little factoid - woman think every man they sleep with who doesn't have a cheesy anteater is circumcised.

They see 1 out of 30 guys with the cheesy anteater and think "ewwww nasty why isnt he circumcised?"

They have no clue that by statistics, about 15 of the 30* dudes they nailed were uncircumcised.

Sources - three sisters, numerous friends that are girls, and a few girlfriends in there for good measure.

*The inflection point was about 1985 nationally. If a guy is 18/19 today, there is probably a 75% likelihood he is uncircumcised.

cliff's notes - girls are ignorant of male anatomy, just like many guys are ignorant of much of the female anatomy.

[taco.vidal]

Quoted for science journal.

Originally Posted by evman150

Here's a little factoid - woman think every man they sleep with who doesn't have a cheesy anteater is circumcised.

They see 1 out of 30 guys with the cheesy anteater and think "ewwww nasty why isnt he circumcised?"

They have no clue that by statistics, about 15 of the 30* dudes they nailed were uncircumcised.

Sources - three sisters, numerous friends that are girls, and a few girlfriends in there for good measure.

*The inflection point was about 1985 nationally. If a guy is 18/19 today, there is probably a 75% likelihood he is uncircumcised.

cliff's notes - girls are ignorant of male anatomy, just as many guys are ignorant of much of the female anatomy.

[Skootenbeeten]

When I learned that when a Jewish baby is circumcised the "Moyle" (I think that is the term for the guy who does it) actually sucks the blood out with his mouth I almost puked.

[SeeBass]

Originally Posted by Skootenbeeten

When I learned that when a Jewish baby is circumcised the "Moyle" (I think that is the term for the guy who does it) actually sucks the blood out with his mouth I almost puked.

Well duh!

You are supposed to remove the cut off skin before you do that or it hits your gag reflex

[sun]

Originally Posted by jhunt223

Meh... It feels better when it looks like they aren't enjoying themselves anyway. The more degrading the better.

brb, PMing Bronzel.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by pylon

LOL, anteaters are always the ones that are all butthurt when any circumcision debate is brought up. Personally I think it is a needless practice. But.... ask any woman that isn't involved with you sexually, what they prefer to get in 'close contact' with, and 90% of them will ewwwwwwwww at the wind sock.

Chicks prefer the helmet. "It isn't as juicy." is what one girlfriend said to me... which made me laugh....then gag till I puked.

Ha ha ha "anteaters". That's great!

You can ask women but in reality it really doesn't matter once it comes down to the deed. Women "think" that this is what they want because that's what they have been told since circumcision has been practiced. And any juicy dink that exists is just someone who doesn't wash. Women have the EXACT same bio down there so they can get just a "juicy" and when they are I ship them off to Mr. Shower the juicy exterminator.

Alberta continues to show that it is still the leader of the "backwards thinking Province in Canada".

"Canada

Wirth showed a pattern of declining incidence of circumcision from 1970 to 1979. There was a wide variation in the incidence of circumcision between with Yukon Territory reported a rate of 74.8 percent in 1978-79 while Newfoundland reported an incidence of 1.9 to 2.4 percent in 1977-78.[19]
In 1994/95, the newborn circumcision rate in Ontario was 299.1 per thousand or 29.9%.[20] The Canadian Paediatric Society (1996) offered an estimate of 48 percent for the prevalence of male circumcision in Canada in 1970.[21] In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics reported that “in Canada, ~48% of males are circumcised”.[22] However, this figure was questioned because the only citation provided for it was an Australian paper dating from 1970.[23]
Articles published in 2003 reported Canadian neonatal male circumcision rates of "10 to 30%"[24] and "less than 17%".[25] According to the Halifax Daily News, the infant circumcision rate in 2003 was "just 1.1 per cent" in Nova Scotia and nil in Newfoundland.[26] A 2006 article placed the (2003) national rate at 13.9%.[27]
Individual Canadian provincial health insurance plans began to delist circumcision in the 1980s.[25] Manitoba Health Insurance Plan discontinued coverage of circumcision in 2005.[28] Circumcision is not covered by any provincial/territorial health insurance plan.[28]
A survey of Canadian maternity practices conducted in 2006/2007 by the national public health agency found a newborn circumcision rate of 31.9%.[29] Rates varied markedly across the country, from close to zero in Newfoundland and Labrador to 44.3% in Alberta."


Page 267
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/rhs-ssg/pdf/tab-eng.pdf

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by Weiser Wonder

The equivalent of female circumcision in males would be cutting off the entire tip. It's a barbaric and disgusting practice. Whereas male circumcision is far less barbaric for most children (although there are horror stories when things go wrong) but still probably wrong.

Not Quite Honest!

There are different stages of female circumcision (AKA Genital Mutilation).

"The main three are Type I, removal of the clitoral hood, almost invariably accompanied by removal of the clitoris itself (clitoridectomy); Type II, removal of the clitoris and inner labia; and Type III (infibulation), removal of all or part of the inner and outer labia, and usually the clitoris, and the fusion of the wound, leaving a small hole for the passage of urine and menstrual blood—the fused wound is opened for intercourse and childbirth.[4] Around 85 percent of women who undergo FGM experience Types I and II, and 15 percent Type III, though Type III is the most common procedure in several countries, including Sudan, Somalia, and Djibouti.[5] Several miscellaneous acts are categorized as Type IV. These range from a symbolic pricking or piercing of the clitoris or labia, to cauterization of the clitoris, cutting into the vagina to widen it (gishiri cutting), and introducing corrosive substances to tighten it.[4]"

The female clitoris has less nerve endings (about 10 000) then the male foreskin (20 000) but the nerve endings on the female are closer together thus making the clitoris more sensitive and a bigger pain in the ass to work with...

All types of female circumcisions, except medically necessary ones, are criminal just as all types for men, except medically necessary ones, should be criminal as well. It's slowly going there but not fast enough in my opinion.

[Nage Waza]

Originally Posted by Skootenbeeten

When I learned that when a Jewish baby is circumcised the "Moyle" (I think that is the term for the guy who does it) actually sucks the blood out with his mouth I almost puked.

This really crazy and disgusting practice is really quite rare and despised in the general Jewish community. Jews have their idiots like any other community and this practice does go on in some rare circles.

Sucking the blood is a 'medical technique' that is obviously wrong. The rules were written a few thousand years ago, anyone that justifies the continued practice is a fool.

Trust me, your Jewish friends did not have blood sucked from their penis when they were circumcised.

[Skootenbeeten]

Originally Posted by Nage Waza

This really crazy and disgusting practice is really quite rare and despised in the general Jewish community. Jews have their idiots like any other community and this practice does go on in some rare circles.

Sucking the blood is a 'medical technique' that is obviously wrong. The rules were written a few thousand years ago, anyone that justifies the continued practice is a fool.

Trust me, your Jewish friends did not have blood sucked from their penis when they were circumcised.

Thanks for clearing that up. Seems a bit extreme to be a common occurrence.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Originally Posted by Skootenbeeten

When I learned that when a Jewish baby is circumcised the "Moyle" (I think that is the term for the guy who does it) actually sucks the blood out with his mouth I almost puked.

That's no Rabbi that's a Golem!

[troutman]

Only 1-2% of adult uncircumcised men have Phimosis, so they are mostly all helmets too.

http://menshealth.about.com/cs/embar...a/phimosis.htm

[drhu22]

Originally Posted by YYC in LAX

lol, this isn't news at all. Pretty sure this has been well known for a long time.

I'm cut and don't give a #### about the reduced pleasure. I'm not even gonna argue that it's cleaner. All I know is i've got a beautiful, aesteticaly pleasing dick and the ladies love that.

The end will be in progress, and well be argueing about our dicks.
Look to the skies.

[Red Slinger]

Entered the thread hoping for a jhunt223 post and left partially satisfied. Only partially because I'm circumsized.

[flylock shox]

The methodology behind these studies is laughable. How are you supposed to measure sensitivity based on self-reporting? It just doesn't work.

At the end of the day, it just stands to reason that a wang exposed to the elements is going to become less sensitive and that, all other things being equal, uncircumcised men have bigger wangs than circumcised men.

Can't we all just agree on that and start talking about lady bits again?

[Daradon]

Originally Posted by flylock shox

The methodology behind these studies is laughable. How are you supposed to measure sensitivity based on self-reporting? It just doesn't work.

At the end of the day, it just stands to reason that a wang exposed to the elements is going to become less sensitive and that, all other things being equal, uncircumcised men have bigger wangs than circumcised men.

Can't we all just agree on that and start talking about lady bits again?

Appear bigger perhaps, but I don't know how cutting a piece off would actually increase it's size.

[mrvee]

I hear Jewish women like 20% off.