Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Bouwmeester has a bad shot from the point if he's trying to score, but he has one of the better shots when it comes to shooting for deflections.
|
The puck is much easier to deflect when it is only moving 12 mph...
My beef with the predictions is not with the end ranking but with the complete lack of thought put into them. It seems as though most of the clowns who are making the predictions can't be bothered to do any actual analysis or thinking beyond the party line. I am not sure if it is that they are afraid of being wrong when speaking against the grain or if they are just too damn lazy to do the work for teams they are not readily familiar with (ie the East).
A couple of things stand out for me from last year - fun facts!
1. Calgary had as many or more regulation time victories as 6 playoff teams (SJ, LA, FLA, WSH, OTT, NJ).
2. Calgary had 4 less regulation time wins (32) than the mighty Canucks (36) just a fyi - STL had the most reg wins at 42.
3. The Flames were 2-7 in OT and 3-9 in SO
4. The Flames were the
only team with less than 30 losses to miss the playoffs
My simple conclusions:
- the Flames are pretty good at hockey but quite terrible at modified hockey (4 on 4)
- the
coin flip let them down.
The margin between good and bad these days is miniscule and a few net positive player changes can be the difference between missing and being a mid to high seed (not just squeaking in). Couple this with the fickle nature of extra time and the extra points the
Flames are not a bad team. This being said, C is still a problem of course. Sure they need a few things to go their way to make the post-season but can that not be said for at least half of the playoff participants?
Edmonton - rehashed over and over here but I still do not see what they did as an intentional rebuild. To me, "scorched earth" implies there was actually something productive or valuable to burn to the ground. Looking back at the Oiler's roster moves I just don't see it. They rebuilt by sucking from the management right on down to the players.
I am also unable to see nor have I heard any reasonable justification on how two players with 0 NHL experience will improve the club by 20 points. Maybe the other players matured a bit and can put it together but it would be quite a story if they can indeed make the playoffs.
From Sportsnet:
Jarome - It is not a secret that Nick Kypreos is a blowhard idiot but his comments about Iginla were brutal. It may be tough for a former plug like him to understand but Iginla potentially staying in Calgary is not due to a lack of desire to win a cup. Iggy has always been the go-to guy in Calgary and perhaps he wants to win a cup on
his team under
his leadership - anything else would be a hollow victory. For a star like him, being the final piece of the puzzle is a far cry from being the lynchpin and may not simply mean as much. Do it here or die trying - I find that view incredibly refreshing in today's era of mercenary 'champions'.
I don't expect Kypreos to understand this as he was never an integral part of a team and probably has not been the go-to guy since intramural league in elementary school.
Go Flames.