Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2025, 11:25 PM   #16581
stemit14
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I would do it but the Leafs wouldn't. That's a bit much.
I think it goes back to the same situation as asking for Knies. If I’m Conroy, this is the price if Toronto wants him. It’s either Knies 1-for-1 or it’s Cowen + 2 firsts + top prospect. It’s obviously an overpay but Toronto has to overpay if they want Andersson. Especially now that Friedman has leaked that he would be willing to sign an extension with them. Treat that as an extension in place if it’s Toronto that is acquiring him. Add in the fact that the flames ownership is still bitter about Treliving leaving the way he did and I hope it will take something like this to get it done for Toronto.

Also, the fact that the picks are so far away hurts the value for the flames and for Conroy (GM’s tenures are rarely 8+ years these days. Even if those picks end up being high picks (say in the top 10)… those players are likely not impact players in the NHL until 2-3 years after they are drafted. So the flames would not be feeling the full benefits (if any) from this trade by around 2031. Andersson will only have 2-3 years left on his contract by then. And that’s assuming they are high picks. If they are in the 25-32 range, the likelihood of those players becoming impact NHLers drops off dramatically.

Last edited by stemit14; 12-18-2025 at 11:29 PM.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2025, 11:27 PM   #16582
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Hopkins is a good hockey player. It is strange that he and Battaglia cannot put up points though, they play on the same line. Last year Pinelli lit it up on the 67’s and he and Foster were their only good forwards. Now Pinelli is almost a PPG player in the AHL.

A little disconcerting that Battalgia and Hopkins cannot find a way to individually still put up good numbers.
Can't argue with that.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2025, 11:40 PM   #16583
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

The one thing that it seems most of the insiders say is that Conroy has a price for his players and that he won’t trade them until that price is met (or close to it). Saw Friedman say it, saw Dreger say it, and it actually rings true to me when I think about his trades. I also think that he is committed to not letting assets walk out the door for nothing. But looking at all his trades (with the possible exception of Zadorov) I believe those two things are his criteria.

Zadorov - I do think Conroy just wanted to get him out of the room. I think the agent comment moved up his timeline. This would be the one exception.

Lindholm - pretty sure the Canucks just met his price

Tanev - I think that was pretty close to his price. Also think he may have been a little worried about injuries with Tanev, by his last 10 games with the Flames it seemed he was leaving almost every game with what looked like could be a serious injury.

Hanifin - I think Conroy had an extension price and probably a rental price and due to some of the shenanigans by the Hanifin camp he took the rental price

Markstrom - I think Conroy had a price. I also don’t think that Bahl was probably in the offers at the deadline but Holtz probably was. Conroy waited and eventually got his price.

Mangiapane - suspect the price was always a 2nd round pick and when someone was willing to pay that price he was moved.

Suspect Conroy has a price for his 3 assets this year and also is committed to not letting Rasmus walk for nothing. Will be interesting to see if or when someone meets the price for any or all of the assets.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2025, 12:12 AM   #16584
traptor
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Yeah i dont think we're getting 4 1st round equivalents for Rasmus.


Holinka also seems like an interesting piece. big rhs c that's putting up good numbers in the whl.

Last edited by traptor; 12-19-2025 at 12:15 AM.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2025, 12:46 AM   #16585
RedHawk12
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
The one thing that it seems most of the insiders say is that Conroy has a price for his players and that he won’t trade them until that price is met (or close to it). Saw Friedman say it, saw Dreger say it, and it actually rings true to me when I think about his trades. I also think that he is committed to not letting assets walk out the door for nothing. But looking at all his trades (with the possible exception of Zadorov) I believe those two things are his criteria.

Zadorov - I do think Conroy just wanted to get him out of the room. I think the agent comment moved up his timeline. This would be the one exception.

Lindholm - pretty sure the Canucks just met his price

Tanev - I think that was pretty close to his price. Also think he may have been a little worried about injuries with Tanev, by his last 10 games with the Flames it seemed he was leaving almost every game with what looked like could be a serious injury.

Hanifin - I think Conroy had an extension price and probably a rental price and due to some of the shenanigans by the Hanifin camp he took the rental price

Markstrom - I think Conroy had a price. I also don’t think that Bahl was probably in the offers at the deadline but Holtz probably was. Conroy waited and eventually got his price.

Mangiapane - suspect the price was always a 2nd round pick and when someone was willing to pay that price he was moved.

Suspect Conroy has a price for his 3 assets this year and also is committed to not letting Rasmus walk for nothing. Will be interesting to see if or when someone meets the price for any or all of the assets.
I think there is some of your personal bias here. You obviously strongly approve of Conroy and the moves he's made as GM. You've made assumptions about Conroy's asking price in each of these situations and shifted blame to external factors in situations where the return wasn't as ideal as some might perceive.

I do agree with your assumption that Vancouver most likely met Conroy's ask. That's why the deal was made in January instead of the deadline. And I do agree that he probably wanted Zadorov out ASAP for culture reasons, and accepted whatever he could as soon as possible.

However, I don't think a reasonable ask was ever met for Hanifin, even as a rental. In that case, once the agent was involved and everyone knew it was going to be Vegas or Tampa, Conroy just had to settle for what he could get from those two teams and they knew it. There was even a report recently (from Friedman?) where he basically said that Conroy probably handle that situation differently now and not get the agent involved. That was a learning moment for Conny, and a loss as far as the trade is concerned (and no, don't say "we don't even know what that pick will turn out to be!" People who say that now are the people who in the offseason said the trade is a slam dunk win because the pick is unprotected and could be top 5 because Vegas is old and regressing. No and no. That pick is low 20s, it was always reasonably going to be low 20s, and you're just relying on hitting a homerun with the pick which is rare).

Tanev trade, maybe. Similar rentals have received 1sts in the past but maybe the market was what it was that year.

Markstrom trade - I'm thrilled with how the trade turned out, but we got very lucky with NJ spiraling to end the season and getting us 16th OA. Just like the Hanifin situation, I wonder if Conroy's ask was met or if Conroy just got backed into dealing only with NJ and just squeezed everything he could out of a tough situation. It felt at the end it was NJ or nothing. I wonder if Conroy would do anything differently now, in a similar situation, to open up the competition a bit.

Mangiapane, yeah ok. I could see Conroy asking for a 2nd and Washington ponying up the ask.

The Andersson, Kadri and Coleman trades, we'll see. If Kadri and Coleman get traded this year, I can see it being because someone met Conroy's ask because they still have term. Andersson, I'm not sure. It may just end up being settling for the best return at the deadline instead of losing him for nothing. We'll see.

Last edited by RedHawk12; 12-19-2025 at 12:50 AM.
RedHawk12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2025, 01:06 AM   #16586
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

An unprotected 1st for UFA Hanifin is pretty fair...miro was a lottery ticket. Guy is great in the AHL but can't seem to transfer that to the NHL level
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2025, 01:13 AM   #16587
RedHawk12
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
An unprotected 1st for UFA Hanifin is pretty fair...miro was a lottery ticket. Guy is great in the AHL but can't seem to transfer that to the NHL level
We can agree to disagree on that one.

I think Conroy learned from the Hanifin trade and I actually anticipate the Andersson return to be significantly better even if it ends up as a pure rental. Andersson and Hanifin are fairly comparable.

Last edited by RedHawk12; 12-19-2025 at 01:16 AM.
RedHawk12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RedHawk12 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2025, 02:06 AM   #16588
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHawk12 View Post
We can agree to disagree on that one.

I think Conroy learned from the Hanifin trade and I actually anticipate the Andersson return to be significantly better even if it ends up as a pure rental. Andersson and Hanifin are fairly comparable.
well we don't even know where the pick falls so we will see
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2025, 02:32 AM   #16589
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
well we don't even know where the pick falls so we will see
All the more reason to trade Andersson to the Ducks or Sharks and try to help Vegas exit as early as possible.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy