Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2025, 05:18 PM   #13001
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
Trouba would have been a good target in retrospect.
Maybe. But he also was done with Canada. Wife is an American Doctor.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2025, 06:13 PM   #13002
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe View Post
Ok. But still, Marner had been in the league 10 years and under several coaches. Not sure what evaluating is needed. And then to think that they were willing to hand total control to Marner and risk him leaving for nothing... wooof.

There was no evaluation needed. If Treliving wanted to trade Marner, he had about a month to come up with a deal. Dubas had likely not laid any groundwork in that direction at all.


And the story is, unconfirmed of course, that Shanny told Treliving that trading Marner before his NMC kicked in was off the table.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2025, 09:38 PM   #13003
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The solution wasn't trading Marner.

It was defending him more and actually re-signing him.

Had they offered him a big extension July 1 2024 he would have likely taken it. But the organization was scapegoating him a bit and didn't want to commit an extension to him then.

Treliving doing what Treliving does
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2025, 09:41 PM   #13004
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
This may indeed be a good plan for a big market team that has actually won something or had some level of sustained success, it's too bad that's nowhere close to what we are. When you’re in an undesirable market it's not traditionally a great business decision to ship out people who for whatever reason desire to be in your market. The Flames don’t have the level of organizational success necessary to be ruthless in their treatment of players.
If Coleman and Kadri were 29 years old then sure.

But they are 34 and 35 years old, in 5 years when the team is ready to contend I don't think them being here now is going to matter.

You treat them well and try to take their considerations on where they want to be traded to into the equation.

But keeping them in Calgary at this point because they want to be here provides no real benefit and it's not being ruthless of the organization to understand that.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2025, 09:42 PM   #13005
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

The wizard is also very good at spreading rumors blaming others and how much he works and how he is involved in every deal
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy