Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2012, 01:55 PM   #1
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default HELOC LTVs Could Drop From 80% to 65%

Interesting if you haven't come across this yet. This came out earlier last month but going through some numbers I had a question for the smart CP minds out there/in this field.

http://www.canadianmortgagetrends.co...-80-to-65.html

Last week, Canada’s top banking regulator Julie Dickson explained why to BNN:

"We started to see [HELOCs] being used as a substitute for a mortgage. Instead of having a mortgage on a house, you had a HELOC only, and that is not what these HELOCs were designed for originally. That's why we suggested in the guideline strongly that there be a loan-to-value ratio of a maximum of 65%."



My question comes from BMO's Q1 release:

http://www.bmo.com/ir/qtrinfo/1/2012...Transcript.pdf

In our HELOC portfolios, the average loan-to-value is 54% . . .


I think BMO is the only major Canadian bank that releases this information. Anyhow, should I be reading this as that the "average" HELOC has been tapped for 54% of the value of the respective property it is held against? Or that the remaining available credit is still 54%, or something else entirely?

The number seems rather high to me and I'm not sure if I'm missing the boat somehow. Thanks in advance.
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 02:09 PM   #2
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

For a $100,000 house, a conventional mortgage would have a maximum amount of $80,000 (80% LTV). A high ratio mortgage would have up to $95,000.

I read it as meaning that for a house worth $100,000 the average HELoC is $54,000.

That number by itself doesn't mean a whole lot though without the context of the time involved (a heloc at 54% after 1 year of getting it is awesome, after 50 years not so much).

I mean a heloc at 80% LTV that never goes down could be great as long as the money that should be paying it down is going into investments or something.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 02:22 PM   #3
ranchlandsselling
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I got a client an 80% LTV HELOC and they went and paid off the entire mortgage of a place in Hawaii that was more expensive debt. This client has some financial wherewithal and has subsequently paid down the mortgage to 35% in short order and likes paying off large components at a time. It will likely be at 0% in 18 months. After this the HELOC may again be tapped partially or in its entirety for future investment purposes. Why punish the good because the bad are stupid. Make the banks take a greater responsibility for the lending they do.

Again look at the rates they earn on personal LOC's. I have three available to me and I wouldn't be able to get an HELOC. But I can get a ton of personal LOC debt available to me at higher rates as well as $20,400 in potential credit card funds. Tell me where the real problem is and where the regulators should be focusing their attention.
ranchlandsselling is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ranchlandsselling For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2012, 02:28 PM   #4
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I assume the concern would be that people are paying interest only and thereby are never paying down their houses. Though going from 80% to 65% doesn't fix that, it just reduces the bank's risk if the borrower defaults I guess.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 02:36 PM   #5
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

What's the typical interest rate on a HELOC?
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 02:38 PM   #6
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
What's the typical interest rate on a HELOC?

Not too much above Prime. Maybe prime plus .25-1%.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 02:47 PM   #7
FurnaceFace
Franchise Player
 
FurnaceFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 110
Exp:
Default

Am I the only one who read the title as "HELOC LCD TVs" and went into the thread looking to find out which TVs had a huge price drop and where I might get one?

Oh the art of skim reading.
__________________
FurnaceFace is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to FurnaceFace For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2012, 02:47 PM   #8
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Banks will go down to prime even if they see you as a good customer. I have prime plus 0.5 but they told me they would drop it to prime if I brought my investment accounts over to their bank.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:07 PM   #9
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

They want to add a repayment terms to the loans as well. That could be a bigger development than LTV.
Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:17 PM   #10
JohnnyHowDoO'duya
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Exp:
Default

so clients with existing HELOC's will see their limit decreased or this is only for new applicants?
JohnnyHowDoO'duya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:24 PM   #11
Nufy
Franchise Player
 
Nufy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

My mortgage is a HELOC. I got it a few years back at prime but they would only give me 55% of the value of the house. It was enough to cover the outstanding mortgage so I went with it...

Currently sitting at 3% as per my last statement...
__________________
Nufy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:26 PM   #12
darklord700
First Line Centre
 
darklord700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

This is the right move. BOC can't jake interest rate up too much or everyone will be in trouble. To reign in real estate prices, they can cap HELOC at a lower LTV rate, thus, eliminating certain people using their house as an ATM.

Still at 54%, that's pretty high.
darklord700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:45 PM   #13
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurnaceFace View Post
Am I the only one who read the title as "HELOC LCD TVs" and went into the thread looking to find out which TVs had a huge price drop and where I might get one?

Oh the art of skim reading.
No, no, the bank of canada wants you to get a HELOC and buy a new LCD tv to stimulate the economy.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:47 PM   #14
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyHowDoO'duya View Post
so clients with existing HELOC's will see their limit decreased or this is only for new applicants?
It seems like it would have to be for new loans, or maybe a timeframe for existing HELOCs to get paid down to 65%. Otherwise, someone with a total LTV of 80% on a 400k house has to come up with a 60k payment right away, which would be a problem for most people, I suspect.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:48 PM   #15
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
What's the typical interest rate on a HELOC?
I've got two at prime - 0.5%
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 03:55 PM   #16
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
I've got two at prime - 0.5%
Can I assume you didn't get those recently?
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 04:02 PM   #17
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Can I assume you didn't get those recently?
Heh yeah it's been a while, but even when I got them they were pretty rare I think. It wasn't long after I got them that I was getting a new property and no one I talked to (brokers) could even match it, and even BMO (where I have them with) wouldn't give them to me anymore.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 04:06 PM   #18
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
Heh yeah it's been a while, but even when I got them they were pretty rare I think. It wasn't long after I got them that I was getting a new property and no one I talked to (brokers) could even match it, and even BMO (where I have them with) wouldn't give them to me anymore.
Yeah, that's a pretty excellent rate. The best I've been able to negotiate lately is prime +0.5, which is a pretty substantial difference when borrowing enough money for another downpayment.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 04:12 PM   #19
onetwo_threefour
Powerplay Quarterback
 
onetwo_threefour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mahogany, aka halfway to Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
I have a RBC house line of credit that I got when I had a mortgage with them. Gt a statement every 3 weeks for $200k. Never used it, don't even know how to use it. Is this a bad thing to keep or should I tell them close it?
If you're not using it it's actually a good thing to have on title IMO. It's not costing you anything and FWIW, it may make your property slightly less attractive to potential fraudsters. It can be easier to perpetrate a fraud against a clear title than in that haa a mortgage registered on it.
__________________
onetwo and threefour... Together no more. The end of an era. Let's rebuild...
onetwo_threefour is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to onetwo_threefour For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2012, 04:36 PM   #20
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
Heh yeah it's been a while, but even when I got them they were pretty rare I think. It wasn't long after I got them that I was getting a new property and no one I talked to (brokers) could even match it, and even BMO (where I have them with) wouldn't give them to me anymore.
I had that with CIBC a few years ago but they sent me a letter raising it up to prime plus one. I fought a bit and knocked it down to prime plus 0.5 but could go no lower without buying more products from them.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy