Quote:
Originally posted by Cowperson+Feb 14 2005, 09:58 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Cowperson @ Feb 14 2005, 09:58 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-looooob@Feb 14 2005, 09:47 PM
Steve Simmons was at the Herald eons ago, way pre-strike of course
Allan Maki was also at the Herald, but left in the late 90s?
Larry Wood, that dude was at the Herald forever
some names I remember from the sports pages
interesting on Eric D...he was on the radio on Friday talking about his own strike experiences at the Herald...he said he thought that going the replacement player route in the fall would be a mistake...saying that (in his experience) that would galvanize the players moreso...whereas as time goes on, if the owners don't poke the players with sticks they will eventually grow weary and lose sight of some of the 'prinicipals' they are supposedly fighting for. I think that's the essence of what he was trying to say?
|
I agree that I wouldn't give players something to rally around too early. Throwing replacements in front of them in October wouldn't crack them. But you might try it in January 2006 and certainly in October 2006. It'll end on one of those dates. The union will be broken.
Printer and journalist unions at the Herald went on strike.
Very hard core ideological people were in charge. On the journalist side, you saw quotes that they were fighting for their freedom in the newsroom and the Herald at the time was considered rather left wing in its editorial slant while in a pretty right wing city.
Management brought in some people at the top who had lots of experience in these matters, the breaking of difficult labour situations.
A contest of wills settled in. Replacement workers were brought in and there was violence on the picket line and intimidation and threats and physical damage to property in the community at homes, cars, etc.
In time though, workers began abandoning the fight, either finding other jobs like Duhatschek did, replaced by George Johnston, or crossing the line after they couldn't afford strike pay anymore. Lots of SUN reporters moved to the Herald.
In the end, if I'm right, about 75% of the union was inside the building.
The unions, with no one left, settled and those who were the most militant were offered packages to go away.
This was a pattern seen in bitter newspaper strikes in places like Seattle, Houston, Detroit and obviously in Britain.
Who owns the business? The people putting up the capital? Are the writers the product?
Dowbiggin was hired before the strike and published articles throughout. He might be a contract columnist and therefore unaffected by the union issues. But it would be fair to say he threw copy over the picket line.
Cowperson [/b][/quote]
Thanx Cow. Thorough as ever.
Now when can the damn Herald fire DOhboy? I miss reading my paper on Saturday.