Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2009, 05:11 PM   #1
Flame Of Liberty
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sydney, NSfW
Exp:
Default The US forsakes Central Europe...once again

The United States has all-but abandoned plans to house anti-missile bases in Poland and the Czech republic, according to a senior White House lobbyist.

Riki Ellison, the chairman of the 10,000 member-strong Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, said in Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza on Thursday (26 August) that the US has changed its mind to avoid a rift with Russia and is now looking at Israel, Turkey, the Balkans or ship-borne facilities instead.


http://euobserver.com/9/28587

Absolutely disgusting IMO and my biggest beef with Mr. Nice to date.

Avoid a rift with Russia? Laughable.

Backing away from thugs like Putin and Medvedev will never work and Mr. Nice is playing with fire here. Russia is increasing it's presence and influence (recent gas crisis, Russian spies being deported on daily basis, etc.) in Europe (NATO countries) and when NATO needs to show a strong stance what does he do? He buries his head in the sand.

Burying your head and "trying to work out" differences with autocrats who have no interest to play fair (Russia, Iran, China, ...) is now the official US foreign policy.

Shame.
Flame Of Liberty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:24 PM   #2
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

I dunno, I always thought expanding the bases into Central Europe was pushing the problem closer to the brink far more than it was helping to solve it.

It's a very VERY delicate issue and I don't mind slowing it down a bit.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:30 PM   #3
Flame Of Liberty
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sydney, NSfW
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
I dunno, I always thought expanding the bases into Central Europe was pushing the problem closer to the brink far more than it was helping to solve it.

It's a very VERY delicate issue and I don't mind slowing it down a bit.
How is that pushing it? Both countries are in NATO. NATO builds military bases on its soil.

When Russia moves bases from Moscow to St.Petersburgh are they pushing it because now they are closer to Scandinavia?
Flame Of Liberty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:31 PM   #4
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Missile defense in Poland and Central Europe is a Bush-era by-product that, thankfully, hasn't been followed through. Russia is not the withdrawn, bankrupt state it was 20 years ago after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and given that they will become one of the world's largest energy producers (and already are, and already do have the ability to starve Europe of oil and gas), why would the US want to provoke them?

Russia is VERY sensitive to military issues, and as such, a policy of waiting isn't necessarily a bad thing. And things haven't gotten bad enough with Iran (which was stated is the point of the missile defense systems) to warrant actually placing them.

I see this as a good move. A strong American dollar and a recovering economy is far more of a buffer against Russia than missiles are.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:37 PM   #5
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame Of Liberty View Post
How is that pushing it? Both countries are in NATO. NATO builds military bases on its soil.

When Russia moves bases from Moscow to St.Petersburgh are they pushing it because now they are closer to Scandinavia?
Well, the same way I guess the US thought the Russians were pushing it when they wanted to put missiles on Cuban soil.

For a technology that is supposed to make the world safer, it certainly seems to be increasing the possibility for a missile attack... Or a conflagration of some kind.

Russia is understandably scared about being behind in the arms race again. About being able to be targeted, but not being able to target others itself.

Now, not saying I have any love for Russia, especially some of their new directions, but the whole Bush idea of missile defense seems to make things more risky in my eyes.

MAD almost makes things the safest unfortunately. When you have one side so far ahead of the other, the consequences for attacks go down, not up, for the little guy in a lot of ways.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:46 PM   #6
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

I don't see what the problem with missile defence is. Russia could easily overwhelm the system with big numbers of nukes. As long as Russian nukes > US anti-nukes > rogue country nukes, you still have MAD for the countries that have been proven to follow it's doctrine, and defense against the countries who have not. IMO, it's the best case.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:48 PM   #7
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Why doesn't the Czech Republic and Poland just do it themselves then if they are concerned? I'm pretty sure they are free to purchase and assemble their own missile defense programs if the U.S. doesn't feel they are strategically as important any more.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 05:50 PM   #8
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

There are no countries that have been proven to not follow MAD's (or similar) doctrines.

I do believe a lot of this 'rogue state' talk is alarmist at best and fearmongering at worst. Yes some of these states have suicide bombers in the peasentry. But, the elite isn't going to take the same chance with their lives. The suicide bombers are being used, the elite doesn't follow the philosophies it sells them.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy