Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2009, 03:49 PM   #1
GreatWhiteEbola
First Line Centre
 
GreatWhiteEbola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default Study finds oilsands emissions only 10% higher than from other crudes.

Quote:
Study finds oilsands emissions only 10% higher than from other crudes
CHQR Newsroom
7/23/2009

Two independent studies have found direct emissions from producing, transporting and refining oil sands crude are in the same range as those of the other crudes refined in the United States.
The province Thursday held a news conference to outline the results.
The Life-Cycle Analysis of North American and Imported Crude Oils report is based on two independent studies that comprise the first robust comparison of domestic, imported and oil sands crude processes in U.S. refineries.
The research, conducted over the past year by U.S.-based consulting companies Jacobs Consultancy and TIAX LLC, was funded by the Alberta Energy Research Institute.
The studies found that direct greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands are generally about 10 per cent higher than direct emissions from other crudes in the U.S. If cogeneration is taken into consideration, oil sands crudes would be similar to conventional crudes in terms of greenhouse gas missions.
Previous studies used a simplified model representation for calculating direct emissions from different crude oil sources. This new research shows a wide range of emissions resulting from the production, transportation and refining of oil. The range of emissions is based on several factors including location, reservoir depth, oil characteristics and production technology.
Another article.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aq_1Bi54q7ug

Could be some real food for thought in the debate.
__________________


Last edited by GreatWhiteEbola; 07-23-2009 at 03:54 PM.
GreatWhiteEbola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:22 PM   #2
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Man, do I ever hate "studies".

But I'm an equal opportunity hater. I hate ones that side with my pro-oil sand views (like this one), and I hate ones that side with the terro....errrr, Greenpeace.


I wish the CEO's of the oil companies would just come out and say "yep, what we do isn't great for the environment, but we're doing it better today than we did yesterday and here's how we're going to do it better tomorrow....oh, and you guys all need this stuff and are willing to pay for it so suck it."
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2009, 04:26 PM   #3
HotHotHeat
Franchise Player
 
HotHotHeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

QR77 reports on a pro-oil study. If there's ever been a brown nosing news agency...
HotHotHeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy