Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2009, 09:29 AM   #1
LChoy
First Line Centre
 
LChoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default Six ways to tell you're not getting the whole oilsands story, according to Knight

Energy Minister Mel Knight made a speech last week and cleared up some common misconceptions about the Oil sands

Quote:
1) incomplete if it starts with the term "tar sands."
- some say this is just about P.R. or spin. Let's be frank: we're producing oil, not tar.

2) incomplete: "ripping up areas the size of Florida."
- Oil sands lay below an area that size.
- 80% developed in situ.

3) incomplete: "destroying the boreal forest."
- Alberta's boreal forest covers more than 147,000 square miles.
- The entire mineable area-less than 1% of the forest. And less than 1/6th of THAT has been disturbed to date.
- Reclamation requirements.

4) incomplete: "depleting fresh water resources to produce oil"
- Up to 90% of water is recycled; saline/non-potable water used whenever possible
- Strict limits on water withdrawals from the river.

5) incomplete: "development is contaminating rivers putting people and the habitat at risk"
- Athabasca River probably one of the most tested water bodies in the world.
- Testing has shown rivers adjacent to oil sands projects have lower contaminant levels than other rivers in the region with no industrial oil sands activity near them.
- River "cuts through" the oil sands area. Bitumen naturally present on banks and in the river.

6) incomplete: oil sands 3-5 times more carbon intensive than conventional oil.
- Only looking at the production side.
- "wells-to-wheels"- less carbon intensive than Venezuelan and comparable to oil that is shipped over from the Middle East. Stack up to California Heavy Oil.
- Important that a low-carbon fuel standard consider this full cycle-don't want special treatment; just a level playing field.
- Oil sands not even the largest source of CO2 emissions in Alberta (coal-fired electricity).
- Perspective: entire country of Canada is 2% of world emissions; oil sands less than 5% of that (so oil sands 1/10 of 1% of world emissions).
http://communities.canada.com/calgar...a/default.aspx
__________________
LChoy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LChoy For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2009, 09:31 AM   #2
Boblobla
Franchise Player
 
Boblobla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Some interesting reading here if you have the time:

http://www.blacksmithinstitute.org/
http://www.worstpolluted.org/

Puts into perspective how other industries rape the environment.
Boblobla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 09:32 AM   #3
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

But think of the Ducks. Wont someone please think of the Ducks.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mykalberta For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2009, 09:33 AM   #4
J pold
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Take that hippies!
J pold is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to J pold For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2009, 09:40 AM   #5
DOK
Crash and Bang Winger
 
DOK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Not to cause a crap storm, but I lived in McMurray and saw first hand what's going on. My biggest concern is that river. I don't buy what he's selling. Ask the people in Fort Makay. No to mention the water they can't use gets put into tailings ponds. Look that up and see what it does. It's a dirty waste of water they can't clean that gets spread out to the thinnest layer and they hope it gets evaporated so they can't do anything about it. Not to mention that these guys are cutting the land down to the next layer of the earth. Reclamation is at a standstill with the smallest amount turned back into forest. And what they have done, is at the entrance to the site to make it look wonderful.

I don't think comparing it to other damaging companies/ countries is fair either. It's' like comparing murders, well, he only killed 5 people, not 10.

I'm no hippie at all, that's what bothers me about it. I'm one to spend money, drive a truck and leave my lights on, yet it bothered me too much to live up there.
DOK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DOK For This Useful Post:
Old 05-06-2009, 11:42 AM   #6
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

I don't want to get into the whole oilsands debate as it's been done before but just want to comment on what a horrible effort of a spin job that article is and how ironic it is that he focuses on the word "incomplete" as the basis for his argument.

Just one example

Quote:
6) Oil sands not even the largest source of CO2 emissions in Alberta (coal-fired electricity).
Begs the question: why is he only reporting CO2 and not all Greenhouse gases? Severly "incomplete" as CO2 by itself is only one of several greenhouse gases. Could it be that it is the only one that is less that coal-fired electricity? If he's going to address global warming gases then look at the full picture and ummm tell the "whole story".

FTR: Oilsands are the largest source of GGs in Alberta.
__________________



Last edited by Bagor; 05-06-2009 at 11:44 AM.
Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 12:06 PM   #7
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

This sounds like a case for Steven Seagal.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 12:08 PM   #8
Kerplunk
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Kerplunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Trapped in my own code!!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor View Post
FTR: Oilsands are the largest source of GGs in Alberta.
Link or reference?
Kerplunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 12:19 PM   #9
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/7964.pdf
Figure 9 Actually it's: (1) O&G, (2) Oilsands (3) Power generation
Figure 10 is also worth looking at whilst you're there.
__________________


Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy