03-14-2009, 04:18 PM
|
#2
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Did you accidentally edit your son's phone # in your phone to have the wrong #?
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
03-14-2009, 04:35 PM
|
#3
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: An all-inclusive.
|
Drunk dial? Just kidding.
|
|
|
03-14-2009, 04:36 PM
|
#4
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
|
I get random people's txts and MMS messages all the time...
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MRCboicgy For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2009, 04:54 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
|
You just got to have fun. All it takes is love and tenderness to send texts.
|
|
|
03-14-2009, 06:44 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Did you accidentally edit your son's phone # in your phone to have the wrong #?
|
Nope. Maybe I'll try sending my son a new text message where I actually put in the number this time and I'll see where it goes. A few years ago I was with Bell and I started getting cell calls for someone else. Turns out they had somehow given my identical number to someone else but mine remained active also. One of us contacted them (I can't remember which of us did it but I had called the guy and we talked about it) and because I had the number first, they changed his number. Also weird.
|
|
|
03-14-2009, 09:34 PM
|
#7
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRCboicgy
I get random people's txts and MMS messages all the time...
|
Same here. I would say that one out of every 500 texts I send/receive either goes somewhere else or I get one from somewhere else.
|
|
|
03-14-2009, 11:21 PM
|
#8
|
Scoring Winger
|
there could of been corruption to the text as it was being transmitted and caused a bit to be flipped in the phone number thus changing the number that it was going to.
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 01:23 PM
|
#9
|
Chick Magnet
|
yup, happened to me as well.
I was texting girl I was dating awhile ago while she was at a bar and I was at home, she'd send to me, I'd reply and it would go to some kid in Edmonton (who thought it was one of his friends messing with him) I cant remember if she'd still get them as well...
It was weird.
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 02:09 PM
|
#10
|
First Line Centre
|
Almost the exact same thing happend to me last night. I got a text from a friend (in my phone book, so their name was correct and everything), and when I hit "reply talk" to dial him, I got some completely random person. I'm with Bell if there's any other coincidence.
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 03:03 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
I'll take my half-assed, non-professional stab at it since even photon doesn't know.
When you send a text, I believe you send the following info:
(flag request to transfer data... data transfer begin, address of destination, MESSAGE, end data transfer)
Inside of address of destination, it is of coarse sent in some binary code (1011) from your cell phone antenna to a cell phone base station. During transfer, there are sometimes environmental factors that cause bit errors, so instead of sending 1011, you might end up sending 101 0. I think the bit error rate most cell phone makers target for is 1/1000.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 07:18 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier
I'll take my half-assed, non-professional stab at it since even photon doesn't know.
When you send a text, I believe you send the following info:
(flag request to transfer data... data transfer begin, address of destination, MESSAGE, end data transfer)
Inside of address of destination, it is of coarse sent in some binary code (1011) from your cell phone antenna to a cell phone base station. During transfer, there are sometimes environmental factors that cause bit errors, so instead of sending 1011, you might end up sending 101 0. I think the bit error rate most cell phone makers target for is 1/1000.
|
This does seem plausible, however 7 is 111 and 9 is 1001, although if they store the entire number as one 32 bit field (or 8 bits for area code, 8 for exchange and 16 for the last 4 digits) then there are alot more possiblities that could cause this to occur, theoretically at least.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 07:25 PM
|
#13
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
This does seem plausible, however 7 is 111 and 9 is 1001, although if they store the entire number as one 32 bit field (or 8 bits for area code, 8 for exchange and 16 for the last 4 digits) then there are alot more possiblities that could cause this to occur, theoretically at least.
|
This thread got nerdy really fast.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lambeburger For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2009, 10:24 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
This does seem plausible, however 7 is 111 and 9 is 1001, although if they store the entire number as one 32 bit field (or 8 bits for area code, 8 for exchange and 16 for the last 4 digits) then there are alot more possiblities that could cause this to occur, theoretically at least.
|
Yes but remember that cell phone signals are encrypted (CDMA, 3G, etc) so 7 isn't 111 and 9 isn't 1001. Its whatever they were encrypted as.
Really depends on what Bell's service is, and their encryption could be more suspectible to bit error rates in the address (which can't be "smart" while text can be "smart" - i.e. spell check). Different encryptions and different implementations of hardware have different susceptibilities to bit error rates (tradeoffs between noise, gain, lower Vdd, etc)
(... I think I'm right... correct me if I'm wrong...)
(sorry for nerding it up)
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
03-15-2009, 11:11 PM
|
#15
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
|
The best are unintended photo messages, I get one of those a month vs. 3-4 accidental txts a month. Usually just dumb pics, but once I got a random long-distance picture of some guy's (rather unimpressive) junk. The accompanying message suggested he was trying to impress some chick. I provided an unflattering, rather judgemental response, to which he never replied, hehe.
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 05:01 AM
|
#16
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hong Kong
|
A few years ago I had a similar thing happen except it was for an emergency helpline number for people trying to get advice about kidney emergencies. (My number was very similar) It was very bad for me since the callers were all old people and often could not understand they had the wrong number. They would call back multiple times and get me by mistake. It got to the point where I had the real emergency number memorized so I could give it to people who called... It was almost like I was an operator for the service. As you can imagine, I changed the number eventually.
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.
|
|