11-18-2008, 09:25 AM
|
#1
|
A Fiddler Crab
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
|
The Atlas of the Real World
A new Atlas has come out which makes use of cartograms (statistical maps) which twist, shrink and distort the familiar world map according to various statistics.
Toys Exported:
Toys Imported:
Hydroelectric Power:
GDP Wealth:
Alcohol Consumption:
Killed by Volcanoes:
Military Spending 2002:
War deaths 2002:
See over 300 crazy maps just like these at:
www.worldmapper.org
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to driveway For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
Totally cool!
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:34 AM
|
#3
|
Not the one...
|
Neat-O. Thanks for sharing.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:38 AM
|
#4
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Atheists
Men Smoking
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:49 AM
|
#5
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
The following ones make me wonder how accurate this is; based on how Canada fares compared to the US:
Internet users 2002:
Adult Literacy:
Both show Canada as being very far behind the US, when we should be about the same if not better. And according to the info it is per capita.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:53 AM
|
#6
|
A Fiddler Crab
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
|
I'm guessing that they aren't adjusting their stats on a per-capita basis, but rather showing the raw numbers.
Hence why Canada is almost always so tiny.
Except in this map:
Nuclear Waste
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:55 AM
|
#7
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
The following ones make me wonder how accurate this is; based on how Canada fares compared to the US:
Internet users 2002:
Adult Literacy:
Both show Canada as being very far behind the US, when we should be about the same if not better. And according to the info it is per capita.
|
From the website it says which to me doesn't seem like per capita but might be. Just doesn't seem like it would make sense if it was per capita for a lot of these maps. Is India really that much more literate per capita than Canada?
Territory size shows the proportion of all people over 15 years old who are literate, that live there.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 09:55 AM
|
#8
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Medicine Hat
|
I think their per-capita info is off smidge. I agree with Ken ... a few of those maps look totally implausible even if you just consider USA and Canada.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 10:04 AM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
|
Forest loss.
Tourist destinations (wonder how they distinguish between that, business trips and illegal immigrants).
Rabies deaths. India dominates.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 12:11 PM
|
#10
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I think those maps are kind of stupid, because when you distort the shapes like that, you can't even tell which country is dominating. For example, in the Rabies Deaths one, I wouldn't have had any clue that the giant yellow blob is India except that I was told.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 01:10 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Territory size shows the proportion of all people over 15 years old who are literate, that live there.
|
I think the map is showing the proportion of people based on the size of the country geographically. Since Canada is the second largest land mass, and we have a small population, we always end up looking tiny. It's probably not per capita, but per sq/km
__________________
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 01:18 PM
|
#12
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
I think the map is showing the proportion of people based on the size of the country geographically. Since Canada is the second largest land mass, and we have a small population, we always end up looking tiny. It's probably not per capita, but per sq/km
|
That's how I understand these maps.
Take the world wide total of whatever is being measured, get the percentage of said total that reside in a given country. Adjust the area of that country on the map to fit the proportion.
Or something like that.
It's not a per-capita measurement, it's a percentage of the total.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.
|
|