11-07-2008, 07:58 PM
|
#2
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
|
Is that for real? I honestly don't think anyone I know would think that we see with rays going out of our eyes.
The only reason I doubted for a second that #1 was the answer was that the article is about misconception so I thought maybe there was something deeper to vision that I'd been mislead to believe.
EDIT: So I decided to test my statement and of the 3 coworkers I asked 2 of them got it wrong and the other one didn't answer.
However after explaining the answer all 3 were confused about the question because it is misleading itself. They all thought that the outward rays were in reference to the fact that the eye cannot absorb all of the rays and as such deflects some of the light back out. (something that the article even points out)
It's a loaded question designed to make people fail.
Last edited by flip; 11-07-2008 at 08:10 PM.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 08:15 PM
|
#3
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
It's shocking how many people believe that we only use 10% of our brains--even though if you ponder it for just a second that's clearly nonsense. But that's one that I know for a fact tons of people believe despite taking any number of basic science classes that ought to give them enough information to know otherwise.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
It's shocking how many people believe that we only use 10% of our brains--even though if you ponder it for just a second that's clearly nonsense. But that's one that I know for a fact tons of people believe despite taking any number of basic science classes that ought to give them enough information to know otherwise.
|
The reason why so many people believe it is because those people only use 10% of their brains.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
The second myth of Blind people having better senses is cheating because they distinguish between being better able to use the information and better being able to aquire information.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 10:22 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip
It's a loaded question designed to make people fail.
|
agree with this, most of them were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
The second myth of Blind people having better senses is cheating because they distinguish between being better able to use the information and better being able to aquire information.
|
indeed, echolocation isn't enhanced sense of hearing, it's a new skill?? Now we're nitpicking to create the result we want. Article is a epic fail imo.
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, that article isn't very well written. A lot of the things they tell you are "myths" if you just reword the statement it becomes true.
__________________
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 01:48 PM
|
#8
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
The reason why so many people believe it is because those people only use 10% of their brains.
|
I think it's fair to say that most people only tap into a percentage of their true potential in life. I don't think it's possible to quantify what that average percentage is though.
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 02:51 PM
|
#9
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkey
I think it's fair to say that most people only tap into a percentage of their true potential in life. I don't think it's possible to quantify what that average percentage is though.
|
That isn't the myth, though. The myth is that we only use 10% of our brain. It's very persistent--it gets repeated on the radio, on TV, by otherwise well-educated people. And it's nonsense--if it were true, brain injury would be no big deal--and in fact, most brain injuries (90% of them) would have no effect whatsoever on function. Not to mention how evolutionarily insane it would be to develop a massive resource-draining organ and then only use 10% of it.
I think it's one of those myths that is comforting to believe--because it implies that there might be unimaginable vistas that could be opened up through the power of the human mind alone. But really, our brains actually are running at pretty much peak capacity all the time. If they weren't, we'd be in huge trouble.
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 03:13 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
For the record, my post was an attempt at humor.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 08:35 PM
|
#11
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
I thought it was clever.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
11-09-2008, 12:42 AM
|
#12
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
I lot of those I knew. The brain one surprised me, but it makes sense when they explained it, and I remember learning the different parts and the way they function. I don't know why the myth stuck. Maybe because no one ever told me it wasn't true. Even knowing the different lobes and such, I was never told how intensely they were used.
|
|
|
11-09-2008, 06:03 AM
|
#13
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
I thought it was clever.
|
Me too.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 AM.
|
|