05-29-2008, 12:34 PM
|
#1
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
500,000 songs on my new iPod
edit
Last edited by jydk; 10-21-2008 at 03:12 PM.
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
good luck finding 500000 songs worth listening too
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 12:43 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
"racetrack" memory is something IBM has been working on for a while. It is usually discussed when talking about solid state drives, and might be evolutionary.
However, like OLED displays, it may take a while for it to be scaled to allow mass production.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 12:46 PM
|
#4
|
Dances with Wolves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02
good luck finding 500000 songs worth listening too
|
Absolutely. To me the value in this is just being able to fit a large amount of data onto a small device. In terms of music I can't see it being terribly useful to too many people outside the entertainment/dj industry. I have 20 gigs used up on mine and I probably have never even listened to 80% of it.
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 12:47 PM
|
#5
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
This is one of my pet peaves. Some new bit of geeky news comes out, and they have to dumb it down to how many songs, as opposed to how many gigabytes. Of course, no mention further of what bitrate of songs, nor how long they set as an average song length.
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:14 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
Last edited by fredr123; 05-29-2008 at 01:18 PM.
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:17 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
This is one of my pet peaves. Some new bit of geeky news comes out, and they have to dumb it down to how many songs, as opposed to how many gigabytes. Of course, no mention further of what bitrate of songs, nor how long they set as an average song length.
|
I agree. Although, referring to gigabytes (as you no doubt know) can be similarly confusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte
There are two different definitions of gigabyte in general use: - 1,000,000,000 bytes or 109 bytes is the decimal definition, used in telecommunications (such as network speeds) and most computer storage manufacturers (such as hard disks and flash drives). This usage is compatible with SI. Quote from Seagate: "For drive storage capacity, 1 gigabyte = 1,000,000,000 bytes (or one billion bytes).",[2] Similar quotes are found on the websites of other storage manufacturers.
- 1,073,741,824 bytes, equal to 10243, or 230 bytes. This is the definition commonly used for computer memory and file sizes. Microsoft uses this definition to display hard drive sizes,[3] as do most other operating systems and programs by default. By this definition, there are 1,0243, or 1024×1024×1024 bytes in a gigabyte. (This is equivalent to 1,024 megabytes, where one megabyte is 1,048,576 bytes or 220 bytes.) Since 1999, the IEC recommends that this unit should instead be called a gibibyte (abbreviated GiB). Although there is little other usage of the term "gigabyte" apart from referring to memory, file sizes, or storage capacity, the IEC's recommendations are frequently ignored amongst computer professionals, and "gigabyte" is used colloquially to mean 10243 bytes. The standard body JEDEC Solid State Technology Association acknowledges the conflict and the existence of the IEC recommendations but, in recognition of the widespread colloquial usage, continues to recognize the definition of 10243 bytes.[4]
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#8
|
Such a pretty girl!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jydk
Thats pretty crazy, I can't imagine the late night parties I can host with that kind of music list.
|
I'd imagine it would be the same wouldn't it? You still can't hear an entire iPod in one party.
__________________
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:35 PM
|
#9
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
Hello full digital lossless rips! Screw MP3's!
Dunno... first thought I had.
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:40 PM
|
#10
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
My 80 GB is only half full with 11,000 songs. I can't imagine ever needing more than a 160 GB. Unless you are also storing videos.
I heard somewhere that in 10 years they can make a small device that could store every movie ever made. Urban legend?
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 01:44 PM
|
#11
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
My first thought is "That's going to cost a lot of money to fill up your iPod, paying $0.99/song."
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 02:34 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottabekd
My first thought is "That's going to cost a lot of money to fill up your iPod, paying $0.99/song."
|
Not sure if my math is correct, but that will cost you almost half a million dollars.
__________________
REDVAN!
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 02:51 PM
|
#13
|
Dances with Wolves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredr123
|
haha, what a segway!
This would be sweet for movies ...
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 02:59 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
So in 10 years, solid state storage capacity will be 50 times what it is today. Seems like a really low bar to set considering it's doubling like every 6 months as it is.
In other future news....
10 years from now, IBM still not innovative.
Last edited by Barnes; 05-29-2008 at 03:04 PM.
Reason: Bad math
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 03:07 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
So... uh... how much porn is that?
Like, almost half the nudie pictures ever taken of Pamela Anderson! Wow!
|
|
|
05-29-2008, 08:38 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma - Where they call a puck a ball...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by old-fart
So... uh... how much porn is that?
Like, almost half the nudie pictures ever taken of Pamela Anderson! Wow!
|
|
|
|
05-30-2008, 08:01 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
My 80 GB is only half full with 11,000 songs. I can't imagine ever needing more than a 160 GB. Unless you are also storing videos.
|
I recall saying something similar about a 40G HD i used to have
|
|
|
05-30-2008, 08:02 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottabekd
My first thought is "That's going to cost a lot of money to fill up your iPod, paying $0.99/song."
|
except in Canada downloaded music is free, so quit paying for it already
|
|
|
05-30-2008, 08:08 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02
I recall saying something similar about a 40G HD i used to have
|
No one needs more than 640k of memory.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 AM.
|
|