New movie for Michael Moore?

[Bingo]

Jackpot ...

Now he can do a Clinton movie about being in bed with the Saudis!

NY Sun

[MrMastodonFarm]

oops

[FlamesAddiction]

Pretty much every president from Kennedy is likely guilty of the same thing.

[Bingo]

Hey I agree ... I always laughed at his premise against Bush in 911, and I laugh at this one too.

however, I don't think he's plotting a movie to look into Clinton, do you?

[FlamesAddiction]

No, but then again, Clinton is not the president any more.

There would also need to be a lot more than just this to make a feature length film.

[Bingo]

He can just follow the lead from his last film and make the rest up!

That's the beauty with fiction!

[Faid1]

Originally posted by Bingo@Nov 24 2004, 12:59 PM
He can just follow the lead from his last film and make the rest up!

That's the beauty with fiction!

I love topical humor, thanks

[Lanny_MacDonald]

Originally posted by Bingo@Nov 24 2004, 07:51 PM
Hey I agree ... I always laughed at his premise against Bush in 911, and I laugh at this one too.

however, I don't think he's plotting a movie to look into Clinton, do you?

Yeah, and Clinton has always been connected to the bin Ladens.

[Bingo]

Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald+Nov 24 2004, 03:36 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lanny_MacDonald @ Nov 24 2004, 03:36 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Bingo@Nov 24 2004, 07:51 PM
Hey I agree ... I always laughed at his premise against Bush in 911, and I laugh at this one too.

however, I don't think he's plotting a movie to look into Clinton, do you?

Yeah, and Clinton has always been connected to the bin Ladens. [/b][/quote]
Don't worry ... Clinton has more than enough scandals that have stuck or semi-stuck to him in his Washington days to make a movie.

All you need is an angry right leaning film maker to take every possible truth and make it fact and you have a blockbuster.

[arsenal]

Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald+Nov 24 2004, 03:36 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lanny_MacDonald @ Nov 24 2004, 03:36 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Bingo@Nov 24 2004, 07:51 PM
Hey I agree ... I always laughed at his premise against Bush in 911, and I laugh at this one too.

however, I don't think he's plotting a movie to look into Clinton, do you?

Yeah, and Clinton has always been connected to the bin Ladens. [/b][/quote]
According to the 6 degrees of seperation, I could link you to the Bin Ladens as well

[Lanny_MacDonald]

Originally posted by Bingo@Nov 24 2004, 09:48 PM
Don't worry ... Clinton has more than enough scandals that have stuck or semi-stuck to him in his Washington days to make a movie.

All you need is an angry right leaning film maker to take every possible truth and make it fact and you have a blockbuster.

The problem is, Clinton is old news. And much of that old news was a pack of lies anyways, so it would not make for a good film. Now if they wanted to skewer Michael Moore, well that would be a big hot on both sides of the political spectrum. I don't know anyone who does not think that Moore needs to be taken down a notch. I'd pay to see it.

[Flame On]

Originally posted by Bingo+Nov 24 2004, 02:48 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Bingo @ Nov 24 2004, 02:48 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Yeah, and Clinton has always been connected to the bin Ladens.

Don't worry ... Clinton has more than enough scandals that have stuck or semi-stuck to him in his Washington days to make a movie.

All you need is an angry right leaning film maker to take every possible truth and make it fact and you have a blockbuster. [/b][/quote]
Yeah but then whatever that may bring up many will just disregard, swallow the lame defence or otherwise vote for the guy anyways for tenuous....erm well lets just say using the same analogy it'll be ignored.