Quote:
Originally Posted by browna
Doesn't there have to be multiple murders of the same modus operendi to even be considered close to the definition a serial killer?
|
Yeah, that article "3 Calgary women murdered within 5 months" is a pretty big leap from random murders to serial killer. To me, a parapragh like "These murders are different, in that the deaths involved cruelty. The phrase 'serial killer' is repeated in coffee shops, and on C-Trains, and around the proverbial office water-cooler," is very irresponsible journalism.
You have one body dismembered and dumped in the river, one killed in a high risk area (and in an intersection where her screams were heard) and one in a more secluded area. Doesn't really sound like the same dude to me. And "the deaths involved cruelty" is hardly a solid link between the three.