10-24-2007, 04:42 PM
|
#1
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Liberal party abstains from voting on throne speech
I wonder how those 96 Liberal ridings feel about not having a say in this years government objectives?
These Liberals are more concerned with getting elected than running off principles of the party, and they're losing a heck of a lot of votes along the way.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
__________________
Your resident Apple fan-boy.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:43 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juventus3
I wonder how those 96 Liberal ridings feel about not having a say in this years government objectives?
These Liberals are more concerned with getting elected than running off principles of the party, and they're losing a heck of a lot of votes along the way.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
|
Or they don't believe their constituents want an election right now but they also won't support the throne speech.
It's politics - nothing more, nothing less.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:45 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Hahah good for them.. With Dion at the helm they are almost as unattractive as the NDP.. Just one more step towards a conservative majority and that "hidden agenda" I've been dying to see unveiled..
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:46 PM
|
#4
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
Or they don't believe their constituents want an election right now but they also won't support the throne speech.
It's politics - nothing more, nothing less.
|
There's a difference between not thinking their supporters want an election and thinking they can't win an election.
__________________
Your resident Apple fan-boy.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:47 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
|
It looks like both major leadership conventions of one year ago, have brought forth the exact same result... two incompetent leaders.
Dion took the Liberals from being a credible opposition and constant threat for re-election to a laughing stock and a lame duck. Harper has totally outmaneuvered Dion.
As for Farmer Stelmach... we'll see what legacy he carves for himself tomorrow afternoon. Luckily for Ed, even his opponents seem equally incompetent or are suffering from being irrelevant due to proximity to the margins (sorry Alliance, I do like a lot of your economic platform though)
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:48 PM
|
#6
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderball
As for Farmer Stelmach... we'll see what legacy he carves for himself tomorrow afternoon.
|
That's actually today, no?
Has anyone ever heard of a mass abstention like this on a Throne Speech before?
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 04:52 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntenseFan
That's actually today, no?
Has anyone ever heard of a mass abstention like this on a Throne Speech before?
|
I thought I heard Oct 25 (thursday) at 3pm EST.
Edit: Wait, you're right. Its tonight at 6:40pm... he'll just explain it more tomorrow at 1pm.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 06:16 PM
|
#8
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Trapped in my own code!!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntenseFan
Has anyone ever heard of a mass abstention like this on a Throne Speech before?
|
Didn't the Conservatives do this a few years ago when the Liberals had the minority government? Didn't want an election so the front liners voted and the rest abstained.
Meh, so I got it backwards. Not a Throne Speech, but it was a confidence vote.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/...es_050309.html
Last edited by Kerplunk; 10-24-2007 at 06:40 PM.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 07:01 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juventus3
I wonder how those 96 Liberal ridings feel about not having a say in this years government objectives?
These Liberals are more concerned with getting elected than running off principles of the party, and they're losing a heck of a lot of votes along the way.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
|
The same as they would feel if the Conservatives were running a majority government I suppose.
As for the "care more about being elected" comment...that is what politics is about! Every opposition party wants to be the government, and every governing party wants to stay there!
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 07:06 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
As for the "care more about being elected" comment...that is what politics is about! Every opposition party wants to be the government, and every governing party wants to stay there!
|
Absolutely.
I think a lot of people are surprised that the Liberal's fortunes have diminished so greatly under one-trick pony Dion, that they have to abstain out of knowledge that they would be trounced in an election, and that the Dippers could be the official opposition for the first time in history. (okay, I'm pushing it... but things are pretty bleak in Gritville)
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 12:41 AM
|
#11
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
The same as they would feel if the Conservatives were running a majority government I suppose.
As for the "care more about being elected" comment...that is what politics is about! Every opposition party wants to be the government, and every governing party wants to stay there!
|
That would be true.....but here is the but....
They, the Liberals, could have actually care(d) about doing something for this country other than doing things that they think would get them re-elected!
You know....like lead!
Again we see how hollow their policies, visions and convictions really are.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 01:06 AM
|
#12
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juventus3
I wonder how those 96 Liberal ridings feel about not having a say in this years government objectives?
These Liberals are more concerned with getting elected than running off principles of the party, and they're losing a heck of a lot of votes along the way.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
|
Dion was told by his members he couldn't win an election as his party is in near shambles. He had no choice but to get a number of his elected members to abstain from voting. It's a political move to save face.
The Liberals played this game of chicken with the Harper govt hoping they would cave in to some of their demands. Harper called his bluff and dared the Liberals to force an election.
__________________
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 07:17 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juventus3
I wonder how those 96 Liberal ridings feel about not having a say in this years government objectives?
|
Meh, it's politics as usual. Your attempt to spin this like the Liberals are somehow abandoning their constituents shows a lack of knowledge of Canadian government history -- and recent history at that!
As Kerplunk noted, Harper's Conservatives also abstained en masse instead of voting against Paul Martin's budget and triggering an election in 2005. Where was the huge outcry then from the CPC supporters around these parts that they weren't getting any say in how their federal tax dollars were being spent because their MPs didn't vote against the budget that year?
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 08:35 AM
|
#14
|
Norm!
|
I'm fine with it, I knew it was going to happen, but I honestly thought that the Liberal's would stay away from the vote enmass as a strong protest.
When the Conservatives abstained against Martin's budget, it was seen as a delaying tactic since the Conservatives were not ready for an election, but it wasn't seen as the move of a weak leader.
With Dion, because of all of the issues going back to the leadership of its party, and the fact that he's allowed himself to be played and abused by harper, it is a huge sign of weakness because he's opened the door for Harper to strip him of his platform in any upcoming election due to forcing Dion to support his platform through the use of the confidence votes.
Eventually, Dion is going to have to swallow his pride, trigger an election and take his beating like a man.
The Liberal Party is in dire straits, and will remain that way for quite a while. I don't think they'll plummet as far as the Conservatives did with Kim Campbell though.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:00 AM
|
#15
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I could really care less as they are all dufii but the strategy of abstaining is stupid. No matter what it makes that party sound like weasels. The Liberals for instance squawking the "people don't want an election" line and it makes them look like losers.
Why not just come right out and say we don't think in the current political climate that we can achieve a majority and so it's smart politics to not have an election now. Then add and we are confident this government will lose what confidence you have in them and we will soon return to a majority government position. On the attack!!!
With everybody saying they are weak they come out and appear --- WEAK.
I'd change the message while still abstaining and waiting for a better hand if I was the Liberal braintrust.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:05 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Politically its a smart move. Take your licks now and hope to fight another day. Dion has to clean his own house before he can try to run an election. I wouldnt want to be in his shoes - lots of sharks about.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:34 AM
|
#17
|
Has Towel, Will Travel
|
AFAIC, the longer Dion and the Liberals want to flounder around and tread water, the better. Their current ineptitude gives Harper the freedom to govern as if he has a majority anyway, and the longer the current scenario plays out the stronger the majority I think Harper will eventually win. The longer this goes on the more voters will abandon the Liberals, and the more voters will overcome their fears about "evil" Harper's "hidden agenda." The course the Liberals are on will elect the first NDP opposition in history.
Acutally, the stars are aligned quite nicely at the moment in general. The Liberals are sucking slough water, the Coilers look like they might win the draft lottery but not benefit from it, the Eskimos suck, Borat and the Canuckleheads are floundering and Sather's big spending this summer has the Rangers sitting in 14th place in the Eastern Conference. And the Red Sox are looking good in the World Series. Life is good ... now if the Stamps can pull a horseshoe out of their arses life will be truly terrific.
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:44 AM
|
#18
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Prefect
AFAIC, the longer Dion and the Liberals want to flounder around and tread water, the better. Their current ineptitude gives Harper the freedom to govern as if he has a majority anyway, and the longer the current scenario plays out the stronger the majority I think Harper will eventually win. The longer this goes on the more voters will abandon the Liberals, and the more voters will overcome their fears about "evil" Harper's "hidden agenda." The course the Liberals are on will elect the first NDP opposition in history.
Acutally, the stars are aligned quite nicely at the moment in general. The Liberals are sucking slough water, the Coilers look like they might win the draft lottery but not benefit from it, the Eskimos suck, Borat and the Canuckleheads are floundering and Sather's big spending this summer has the Rangers sitting in 14th place in the Eastern Conference. And the Red Sox are looking good in the World Series. Life is good ... now if the Stamps can pull a horseshoe out of their arses life will be truly terrific.
|
LOL this is so so true. It is priceless having the Esks and Oilers suck at the same time. Meanwhile there does exist the chance the Stamps could at least win the Semi-Final. Plus the Hitmen are looking very good. Maybe we get a special year for Calgary sports fans at the same time the fans up North are hating life!!!!!
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:52 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
That would be true.....but here is the but....
They, the Liberals, could have actually care(d) about doing something for this country other than doing things that they think would get them re-elected!
You know....like lead!
Again we see how hollow their policies, visions and convictions really are.
|
So if they were to trigger a vote today would you vote for them? Would you give them a chance even?
If you can't honestly consider them as an option why would any rational person subject themselves to an election?
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:56 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juventus3
These Liberals are more concerned with getting elected than running off principles of the party . . .
|
You're just clueing into this now? The only 'principle' of the party is and always was getting elected.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.
|
|