Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2007, 01:32 AM   #1
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default Clash over oilsand inevitable: Lougheed

A war is looming between Alberta and the federal government over pollution caused by oil sands development that will far surpass any previous federal-provincial battle in its political and economic stakes, former Alberta Premier Peter Lougheed predicted Tuesday.
Mr. Lougheed told a Canadian

http://www.reportonbusiness.com/serv...y/robNews/home

He said that Alberta's desire to bypass toughened federal environmental laws will cause considerable dispute within the province itself, and will “cause significant stress to Canadian unity.

"My surmise is that we're into this constitutional legal conflict soon,” he said. “And my surmise is that – and this is strong stuff – national unity will be threatened if the court upholds federal environmental legislation and it causes major damage to the Alberta oil sands and our economy.”
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 02:13 AM   #2
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Lougheed's a pretty smart feller, although not without his own patented brand of theatrics. Sort of a Straight Shooter with a silencer. He didn't really tip his hand in regards to pollution.

Getty, Klein and Stelmach is a pretty sorry lot as successors. I got that much out of his comments.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 02:15 AM   #3
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think Manning has it correct when he said that a Green Conservative Party would really sell in Alberta. And if this is what it's going to come to, I can see that being a smart alternative for a lot of voters.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 03:23 AM   #4
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Lougheed's a pretty smart feller, although not without his own patented brand of theatrics. Sort of a Straight Shooter with a silencer. He didn't really tip his hand in regards to pollution.

Getty, Klein and Stelmach is a pretty sorry lot as successors. I got that much out of his comments.
Getty was a disaster. Every time there was a crises and there were lots, they'd find him on the golf course in Palm Springs. Klein seems to have been in the oil companies back pocket and I don't much about Stelmach.
I see it being a fight between the oil companies and the federal government. The Provincial government is just a puppet. When the provincial government loses, the oil companies will have a snit and stop their developments.
Alberta's economy will suffer until big oil comes back on better terms but really they will have no choice if they want to make money.
What bothers me is that these international oil companies will make big money at todays prices being green or not. They just don't like being told what to do.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 09:51 AM   #5
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Peter is correct in upcoming legal battle if the Feds do anything about natural resources.

It would likely put the country in a battle pitting Alberta, BC, vs Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec (maritimes and Sask are hard to figure where they would land).

If the Feds wanted to do anything - they could easily increase the gas tax, increase emission standards on all vehicles and commercial buildings, increase commercial income tax on NR companies etc. The problem is the oil sands and 1.05/L gas is an easy target to sell to the 405 beltline.

MYK
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 09:57 AM   #6
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
The problem is the oil sands is an easy target to sell to the 405 beltline.
Frankly, it's Albertan's who should be the easy sell. It's OUR backyard that is being destroyed and mangled.

Last edited by Table 5; 08-16-2007 at 10:00 AM.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 10:53 AM   #7
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Frankly, it's Albertan's who should be the easy sell. It's OUR backyard that is being destroyed and mangled.
How is propelling our Province to financial superiority over every other district in North America by utilizing otherwise useless land destroying or mangling.

Alberta is a relative newborn in the industrialized age so if the growing pains of such rebirth is pollution, but less than the total amount produced by Ontario's cars+industry or Europe's industrial revolution - then so be it. With any new industry there are pollution growing pains, you learn from it, the technology gets better and you evolve as an industry.

I dont know why Alberta just doesnt inact some simple emission laws - say mirror the upcoming ones in California. There is no auto industry in the province so you wouldnt hurt jobs in Alberta - and so what if it costs a bit - it should be considered a tax to drive on Alberta roads.

MYK
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 11:29 AM   #8
Hakan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: do not want
Exp:
Default

There's no question that the fiscal imbalance between Alberta and the rest of the federation is going to have serious consequences on Canadian federalism.

Something will need to be done. Alberta isn't making much of a case for itself with it's very high profile mishandling of oil revenues through populism and mismanagement.
Hakan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 02:06 PM   #9
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hakan View Post
There's no question that the fiscal imbalance between Alberta and the rest of the federation is going to have serious consequences on Canadian federalism.

Something will need to be done. Alberta isn't making much of a case for itself with it's very high profile mishandling of oil revenues through populism and mismanagement.
###....sadly.

Lougheed has an interesting argument here though. Its a parallel that I didn't see coming right away, and creates some interesting issues for the constitution as a whole once that can of worms gets opened up.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy