01-17-2011, 01:52 PM
|
#1
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
|
Canada Tightens Mortgage Rules
Didn't find this topic anywhere, and this could have gone in the "Calgary Real Estate" thread, but i thought it warrants its own discussion.
Quote:
Flaherty announced that he was moving the maximum amortization period to 30 years from 35 years and lowering the refinancing limit to 85% of a home's value from 90%. As well, he said the government was withdrawing insurance on home equity lines of credit.
|
From : http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-...17-706559.html
Probably a good move, but the government went 0 down and 40 year amort so the average canadian could afford a house, but all it did was push up prices. Now as they tighten, anyone who entered the market in 06/07/08/09 due to the new rules is going to suffer as home prices drop as it makes it tougher for new/young buyers to qualify. I see homes in the 200-400k suffering in price as a direct result. All the people who could earlier qualify for say 300k houses can now only buy 270k houses.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Finner For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2011, 01:55 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
|
But this helps those of us who are waiting to buy houses?
If I am following this correctly, house prices will drop, allowing me to pick up a nicer establishment for relatively less than someone would have paid in the last 5 years?
With the shorter term, it would also seem to encourage putting a larger down payment on a house at the beginning, which also lessens the risk of default over the term of the mortgage.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:00 PM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
When does this go in to effect?
As far as prices go, I'd be surprised to see them drop. Level off ....yes ....
__________________
I like to quote myself - scotty2hotty
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#4
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty2hotty
When does this go in to effect?
As far as prices go, I'd be surprised to see them drop. Level off ....yes ....
|
March 18th IIRC.
I just started house hunting (first time buyer) and seen this announced today.
I've been actively watching housing prices for the last year. There has been a recent dip in asking prices for places in the area we are looking at. If there is speculation of an even further dip....
I'm curious as to what effect this will have on housing prices.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:50 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
I've still yet to see a good answer for people who got one of the now unavailable mortgage products (e.g., zero down, 40 year amort) when it comes time to renew in the next year or two.
Do these people have to come up with the minimum downpayment now, which may be more difficult than ever if their house declined in value during the recession? Are they going to see large increases in their monthly payments as the amortization period is reduced? Are they in danger of no longer being able to afford their home if they can't meet these new requirements?
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:52 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
So should I try to sell my rental property before March 18?!?
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:57 PM
|
#7
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In the cut, in the cut
|
in related news, the United States decided to lower mortgage rates to 0.000000004% on a 1,000 year mortgage to encourage home ownership and spending.
THAT'LL MOVE THE CHAINS!
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:01 PM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredr123
I've still yet to see a good answer for people who got one of the now unavailable mortgage products (e.g., zero down, 40 year amort) when it comes time to renew in the next year or two.
Do these people have to come up with the minimum downpayment now, which may be more difficult than ever if their house declined in value during the recession? Are they going to see large increases in their monthly payments as the amortization period is reduced? Are they in danger of no longer being able to afford their home if they can't meet these new requirements?
|
I think that your second paragraph is the answer there....they are going to have to refinance, and the new rules will mean that they will be forced into a new mortgage. The best thing they could do (theoretically) is get something arranged before March 18th....at least that is my guess?
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:08 PM
|
#9
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
|
Wait what? If you've already signed into a 40 or 35 years you don't have to refinance...you are grandfathered in. You'll just renew as usual as if you had a 25 year mortgage originally, you just won't be able to refinance in the future to the same level.
Right now i renew mortgages that have 37 year amorts left; Clients don't have to refinance.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Finner For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:25 PM
|
#10
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 51.04177 -114.19704
|
That piques my interest - Do people with 35 year mortgages have to refinance then? Or do they get grandfathered in? If they don't, that's going to essentially bankrupt some people?
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:27 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
You can renew your existing mortgage, but you can't refinance.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:29 PM
|
#12
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 51.04177 -114.19704
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
You can renew your existing mortgage, but you can't refinance.
|
Sorry - what's the difference? Would that mean someone had to stay with the same bank, they can't port the mortgage to a different broker or whatever that has better rates? Seems to penalize people?
Or does that mean you can't take a 35 year mortgage and refinance it to 25 years, and then try to take it back to 35 years some time later?
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:30 PM
|
#13
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 51.04177 -114.19704
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
So if someone has a 40 year mortgage, what happens when it comes up for renewal?
|
They had such thing as 40 year mortgages here?!?!?
You'd likely be retired and still be paying off your house, wow!!!
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:48 PM
|
#15
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amorak
They had such thing as 40 year mortgages here?!?!?
You'd likely be retired and still be paying off your house, wow!!!
|
Not as bad as England....50 year mortgages IIRC...this was a few years back though and maybe they have also changed their system...30 years makes more sense as most people should be buying their first home by the time they are 25 and then they can hit "Freedom 55" without a mortgage. People will have to be more responsible with their money and expectations and the sense of entitlement may need to be reigned in. The debt ratios show that the current system wasn't working and it is likely a case of the government seeing a balloon slowly inflating to the point where they felt the need to reach over and pinch it before it became an even greater problem. First time home buyers should actually wait it out ...there will come a time when prices will be much lower than they are today.....Use "The Dent Method" to your advantage....These changes will just play into these trends....
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:07 PM
|
#16
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
So if someone has a 40 year mortgage, what happens when it comes up for renewal?
|
Nothing, you renew your mortgage. However if you want to transfer your mortage to another institution you could only get a max 30 year mortgage from the new institution.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Finner For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:10 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
I wish they went to 10% down payment and 25 year amortization and no insurance on refinances over 80%
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:11 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amorak
Sorry - what's the difference? Would that mean someone had to stay with the same bank, they can't port the mortgage to a different broker or whatever that has better rates? Seems to penalize people?
Or does that mean you can't take a 35 year mortgage and refinance it to 25 years, and then try to take it back to 35 years some time later?
|
Wow, who every would have thought getting into a zero down 35 year mortgage could come back to bite someone in the ass?
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:15 PM
|
#19
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
Wow, who every would have thought getting into a zero down 35 year mortgage could come back to bite someone in the ass?
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Burry
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:32 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amorak
They had such thing as 40 year mortgages here?!?!?
You'd likely be retired and still be paying off your house, wow!!!
|
Not really. My last 25-year mortgage was paid off in about 13 years. People do that all the time - the smart ones.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MoneyGuy For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.
|
|