Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2023, 06:25 AM   #1
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default Reasonable trade return for Lindholm?

With the Toffoli return in the books I wonder if many are recalibrating the potential return in a deal with Lindholm. Just curious what others see as a minimal return for him?

Personally I think a mid 1st rounder this year up until about pick 18 is the minimal I would expect with not getting annoyed. Others thoughts?
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:29 AM   #2
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Imo, if you’re not getting minimum first plus good prospect, hang on to him until the deadline.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 06:29 AM   #3
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

If he's traded I think the Flames will get a 1st rounder but it'll be a 2024 1st rounder from a playoff caliber team, so a later 1st rounder a year away.

Plus a young NHL player, and a prospect that gets a very mixed reaction from this fan base, so not a blue chip.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:30 AM   #4
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

I don’t think Lindholm gets traded tonight but if he did it would probably be something similar to PLD.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 06:31 AM   #5
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I'm not expecting him to be moved this week. I get the feeling this is turning into a bit of a Gaudreau situation where the player is leading on the team and the GM is content to let the player steer the ship. If I was Lindy I would do the same thing in hopes I could play out the deal and choose my next team next summer. If you are the Flames you really have to table your best offer and move on if it's not accepted.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:33 AM   #6
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

I am fine waiting for a better offer. Like I said, this UFA class is one of the worst ones in the last decade. Teams are going to be willing pay something if they don't get one of the better players in free agency.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:34 AM   #7
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

young NHLer + decent prospect + a 1st.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 06:38 AM   #8
CgyFlamesftw
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Blue chip prospect +1st. Or young potential NHL ready player + 1st. Flames literally have the best two way Center available, really hope Conroy doesn’t screw this up.
CgyFlamesftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:48 AM   #9
BrownDrake
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2015
Exp:
Default

Should get more than Newhook obviously but the timing may hurt us for first round 2023 draft picks. First round picks are easier to acquire at the deadline when teams are making a push to win now or picks in later years , 1 or 2 years away.


This is a much deeper draft as well.


If Conroy wants a 1st this year maybe its one in the 27 to 32 range and a good roster player or prospect??


I think a sign and trade is the only way we get a decent 1st round pick.
BrownDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:51 AM   #10
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

If the offers are not what you want, Sakic the heck out of it.
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:53 AM   #11
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Young ish roster player who won't become an all-star and a second in 2024
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:53 AM   #12
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling the Flames will not get their asking price met. The media is portraying that the Flames are not even talking trade with other teams in hopes he signs. I hope that is a smokescreen but have doubts they are focused on anything other than getting him signed. I hope it all changes with a phone call
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 06:57 AM   #13
OptimalTates
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Exp:
Default

A playoff healthy scratch and a third round pick and you’re going to like it!
OptimalTates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:07 AM   #14
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I have a feeling the Flames will not get their asking price met. The media is portraying that the Flames are not even talking trade with other teams in hopes he signs. I hope that is a smokescreen but have doubts they are focused on anything other than getting him signed. I hope it all changes with a phone call
If we are getting trash offers then we are better off keeping Lindholm imo. Conroy has made it clear that the pending UFA's will be moved if they aren't wanting to sign here long term. By March of 2024, it would be a crime if he still didn't know who wanted to stay. Also gives Lindholm time to try and build the value for a good extension, assuming we don't re-sign him. We could also be terrible, which means Lindholm will be a highly coveted piece.

Lindholm is still a big question mark but He or Backlund need to go and Hanifin still needs to go. As long as Backlund and Hanifin are taken care of I am okay with waiting on Lindholm. It's hard to find centers of his calibre via free agency, so I'd prefer to keep him if the offers are not there. It's likely the classic case of bullying on the new GM, but Conroy isn't having it. I respect that.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:08 AM   #15
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

I don't think any mid- 1st round picks are on the table for 2023, and have always thought they'd be very hard to come by.

I don't think he gets traded today, but if he does, it will be for player with about 3 years experience who is a RFA with potential to pop, a first round pick in 2024 and another decent pick (either 2023 or 2024 or a decent prospect).

It won't be what most here were expecting, but it will be an OK return.

I actually think he'll sign here for about $9.5M.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:16 AM   #16
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

A young blue chip prospect with some nhl experience and a 1st in 2024. It’s a deep draft this year not just for our team , but all teams . Can easily see teams not wanting to trade this years first. That said think flames will give lindholm a lot more time to make decision. Think it’s the wrong way to play it .
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:16 AM   #17
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
Imo, if you’re not getting minimum first plus good prospect, hang on to him until the deadline.
Do you think the Flames will trade their #1C if they’re in a playoff spot at the deadline?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 06-28-2023 at 08:20 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:22 AM   #18
Angelino
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Angelino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny California
Exp:
Default

2nd round pick + unknown Russian (Ruslan Zainullin type) and/or Belarusian?
__________________

Angelino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:33 AM   #19
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

I'll put the kiss of death on this. I don't think Lindholm gets traded today. He won't get traded for another month, and the return will be underwhelming based on expectation bouncing around here. I expect a trade for 22-25 year old player that can play right now, an AHL pro close to making the jump, and then another prospect or draft pick in the 2nd/3rd round. This would all be without an extension in place. Using Carolina as an example I would say Lindholm for Jack Drury, Noel Gunler, and Anttoni Honka would fit the framework. With an extension, jump up a level for the top player and pick going back. Using Carolina again as an example, Lindholm for Seth Jarvis, Aleksi Heimosalmi, and a 1st round pick in 2024/2025.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 07:34 AM   #20
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
I'll put the kiss of death on this. I don't think Lindholm gets traded today. He won't get traded for another month, and the return will be underwhelming based on expectation bouncing around here. I expect a trade for 22-25 year old player that can play right now, an AHL pro close to making the jump, and then another prospect or draft pick in the 2nd/3rd round. This would all be without an extension in place. Using Carolina as an example I would say Lindholm for Jack Drury, Noel Gunler, and Anttoni Honka would fit the framework. With an extension, jump up a level for the top player and pick going back. Using Carolina again as an example, Lindholm for Seth Jarvis, Aleksi Heimosalmi, and a 1st round pick in 2024/2025.
I'd take second Carolina deal right now lol
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy