12-04-2018, 08:25 PM
|
#1
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Flames 9 Jackets 6
Game Takes:
Flames 9 Jackets 6
- Monahan and Gaudreau both net four points
- All four goalies play
- Flames win and that is all
|
|
|
|
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
badger89,
belsarius,
bigrangy,
Brick,
calgaryboy,
Cheese,
cral12,
D as in David,
DeluxeMoustache,
DigitalCarpenter,
Dion,
Enoch Root,
FacePaint,
firebug,
GreenHardHat,
HERIONBEER,
Hockey-and_stuff,
Playfair,
psyang,
SoulOfTheFlame,
Stillman16,
the2bears
|
|
12-04-2018, 08:33 PM
|
#2
|
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Game Takes:
Flames 9 Jackets 6
- Monahan and Gaudreau both net four points
- All four goalies play
- Flames win and that is all |
LOL..and thats all that matters but that game was....yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-04-2018, 08:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
So the Flames had more goals than high danger scoring chances? Which of their goals didn't count as high danger chances?
|
|
|
|
|
12-04-2018, 10:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
When was the last time we talked comfort room at this time of the season? Personaly I can't remember.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2018, 04:51 AM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
So the Flames had more goals than high danger scoring chances? Which of their goals didn't count as high danger chances?
|
I think you're looking at the 5 on 5 high danger chances (9-7 in favour of CBJ). But total high danger chances favoured the Flames, and were presumably greater than 9.
|
|
|
|
12-05-2018, 06:39 AM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
|
While winning 9-6 isn't spectacular, it's light years better than losing 9-6.
Chalk it up as a win and move on tot he next game.
Contenders need to win ugly sometimes. And that was certainly ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2018, 08:28 AM
|
#8
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
So the Flames had more goals than high danger scoring chances? Which of their goals didn't count as high danger chances?
|
Calgary had 7 high danger chances five on five, 9 overall in the game, and scored three powerlay goals.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-05-2018, 08:41 AM
|
#9
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
It's nice to see the PP being the difference in games like this in 2018 vs 2017, 2016.....
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.
|
|
