Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-08-2017, 06:34 PM   #1
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default Parliament passes bill on insurance and genetic testing

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics...sday-1.4015863

Great news. This bill will bar insurance companies and employers from forcing someone to disclose the results of genetic testing.

Quote:
Bill S-201 would add genetic characteristics as a protected ground under the Canadian Human Rights Act, introduce penalties for discrimination, and forbid employers from subjecting job applicants to a genetic test.

The bill would also allow people to refuse to disclose the results of a genetic test to anybody. Medical experts have said the legislation is necessary to counter the fears associated with potentially lifesaving genetic testing, which could produce results that would help doctors better tailor health treatments.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 03-08-2017, 07:08 PM   #2
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

https://www.ccmg-ccgm.org/images/Gui...ort_letter.pdf

Here is a good letter that points out how this is inportant.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 03-08-2017, 07:22 PM   #3
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Trudeau was arguing as the bill is, it is unconstitutional. Could this be struck down soonish?
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 07:44 PM   #4
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Trudeau was arguing as the bill is, it is unconstitutional. Could this be struck down soonish?
I think each province is going to have to determine the fines and penalties associated with it. And will probably not have to follow it as insurance is provincial jurisdiction. Workplace discrimination due to genetics is federal though I believe.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 03-09-2017, 07:42 AM   #5
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Trudeau was arguing as the bill is, it is unconstitutional. Could this be struck down soonish?
he sure was for the bill before he got elected, wasn't he?
then the insurance lobby kicked in.
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 07:50 AM   #6
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Ya, I don't know enough of the details on this one. There is no point spending a lot of time on a bill if it is going to get struck down by the courts and it could be tough to make it constitutional. Just guesses though, could be the insurance lobby thing too.
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 07:59 AM   #7
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, I don't know enough of the details on this one. There is no point spending a lot of time on a bill if it is going to get struck down by the courts and it could be tough to make it constitutional. Just guesses though, could be the insurance lobby thing too.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cowa...ists-1.4013886

"Jim Cowan said in an interview with CBC News Tuesday that the Trudeau cabinet's opposition to the bill is "curious" given the party's vocal embrace of such legislation during the last election campaign and raised the possibility that aggressive lobbying efforts by the insurance industry soured support."

"Public lobbying records show there have been a number of meetings between the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association and Manulife Financial and senior members of Wilson-Raybould's office over the last year where Bill S-201 was the subject of conversation.
Liberal P.E.I. MP Sean Casey, who was, until recently, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of justice, was also lobbied by the insurance association six times in the last year."
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GordonBlue For This Useful Post:
Old 03-09-2017, 09:08 AM   #8
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

It is extremely important legislation like this exists. Let's say your 23andMe report states you have a higher risk of prostate cancer. That could lead to higher premiums and even a loss or coverage. Eventhough this is just dealing in probabilities.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy